rss
Br J Sports Med 2009;43:i13-i22 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.058255
  • Supplement

Which symptom assessments and approaches are uniquely appropriate for paediatric concussion?

  1. G A Gioia1,
  2. J C Schneider1,
  3. C G Vaughan1,
  4. P K Isquith2
  1. 1
    Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
  2. 2
    Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
  1. Dr G A Gioia, Children’s National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, USA; ggioia{at}cnmc.org
  • Accepted 17 February 2009

Abstract

Objective: To (a) identify post-concussion symptom scales appropriate for children and adolescents in sports; (b) review evidence for reliability and validity; and (c) recommend future directions for scale development.

Design: Quantitative and qualitative literature review of symptom rating scales appropriate for children and adolescents aged 5 to 22 years.

Intervention: Literature identified via search of Medline, Ovid-Medline and PsycInfo databases; review of reference lists in identified articles; querying sports concussion specialists. 29 articles met study inclusion criteria.

Results: 5 symptom scales examined in 11 studies for ages 5–12 years and in 25 studies for ages 13–22. 10 of 11 studies for 5–12-year-olds presented validity evidence for three scales; 7 studies provided reliability evidence for two scales; 7 studies used serial administrations but no reliable change metrics. Two scales included parent-reports and one included a teacher report. 24 of 25 studies for 13–22 year-olds presented validity evidence for five measures; seven studies provided reliability evidence for four measures with 18 studies including serial administrations and two examining Reliable Change.

Conclusions: Psychometric evidence for symptom scales is stronger for adolescents than for younger children. Most scales provide evidence of concurrent validity, discriminating concussed and non-concussed groups. Few report reliability and evidence for validity is narrow. Two measures include parent/teacher reports. Few scales examine reliable change statistics, limiting interpretability of temporal changes. Future studies are needed to fully define symptom scale psychometric properties with the greatest need in younger student-athletes.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: Dr Gioia is a co-author of the ACE and PCSI. No authors have competing financial interests.

  • Funding: This paper was supported in part by grants from the CDC # U17/CCU323352-01, NIH # 5-M01-RR-020359-02, and NIH # P30/HDO40677-07.

This Article

  1. Abstract
  2. Full text
  3. PDF

Responses

  1. Submit a response
  2. No responses published

Register for free content

The full back archive is now available for all BMJ Journals. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006 right back to volume 1 issue 1. Register here to access the free archive of all BMJ Journals.

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.