Article Text

PDF

Occurrence of injuries and illnesses during the 2009 IAAF World Athletics Championships
  1. Juan-Manuel Alonso1,2,
  2. Philippe M Tscholl3,4,
  3. Lars Engebretsen5,6,
  4. Margo Mountjoy5,7,
  5. Jiri Dvorak3,8,
  6. Astrid Junge3
  1. 1International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), Monaco
  2. 2Royal Spanish Athletics Federation (Real Federación Española de Atletismo, RFEA), Madrid, Spain
  3. 3FIFA Medical Assessment and Research Centre (F-MARC) and Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland
  4. 4Sportclinic Villa Linde, Swiss Olympic Medical Center Magglingen-Biel, Switzerland
  5. 5International Olympic Committee (IOC), Lausanne, Switzerland
  6. 6Sports Trauma Research Centre (OSTRC), Oslo, Norway
  7. 7Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA), Lausanne, Switzerland
  8. 8Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA), Zurich, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Juan-Manuel Alonso, RFEA Servicios Médicos, Avenida de Valladolid, 81; 28008-Madrid; Spain; dir.medico{at}rfea.es

Abstract

Objective To analyse the frequency and characteristics of sports injuries and illnesses incurred during the World Athletics Championships.

Design Prospective recording of newly occurred injuries and illnesses.

Setting Twelfth International Association of Athletics Federations World Championships in Athletics 2009 in Berlin, Germany.

Participants National team physicians and physiotherapists and 1979 accredited athletes; Local Organising Committee physicians working in the Medical Centres.

Main outcome measures Incidence and characteristics of newly incurred injuries and illnesses.

Results 236 injury incidents with 262 injured body parts and 269 different injury types were reported, representing an incidence of 135.4 injuries per 1000 registered athletes. Eighty percent affected the lower extremity. Thigh strain (13.8%) was the main diagnosis. Overuse (44.1%) was the predominant cause. Most injuries were incurred during competition (85.9%). About 43.8% of all injury events were expected to result in time-loss. 135 illnesses were reported, signifying an incidence of 68.2 per 1000 registered athletes. Upper respiratory tract infection was the most common condition (30.4%) and infection was the most frequent cause (32.6%). The incidence of injury and illnesses varied substantially among the events.

Conclusion The risk of injury varied with each discipline. Preventive measures should be specific and focused on minimising the potential for overuse. Attention should be paid to ensure adequate rehabilitation of previous injuries. The addition of the illness part to the injury surveillance system proved to be feasible. As most illnesses were caused by infection of the respiratory tract or were environmentally related, preventive interventions should focus on decreasing the risk of transmission, appropriate event scheduling and heat acclimatisation.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Introduction

Athletics is a popular and global sport that participated in the first modern Olympic Games in 1896. Historic reference of athletics date back to the first Olympics in 884 BC.1 Although our group has previously published a similar study, the scientific literature on injury risk in track and field athletes is still scarce.2,,13 Little information is available on illnesses in athletics during high level competition.14,,18

Comparable researches on injury incidence and characteristics were conducted during the 11th World Championship2 by the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) as well as during Beijing 2008 Summer Games by the International Olympic Committee (IOC).19 20 In follow-up of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games, the IOC decided to add illness surveillance for the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympic Games.21 The IAAF and Fédération Internationale de Natation (FINA)22 decided to implement the injury and illness surveillance system at their 2009 World Championships as pilot projects.

The aim of the present study was to record and analyse all sports injuries and illnesses that incurred in competition and/or training during the Berlin 2009 IAAF World Championships, and to prove the feasibility of adding an illness surveillance part. A subsequent objective is to use the recorded data in injury/illness prevention programming in the future.

Methods

The present study used the methodology of injury surveillance implemented at the Osaka 2007 Championships2 and the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games,19 20 which was extended to include an illness survey.21 22 Physicians and physiotherapists of the national teams were asked to report upon newly incurred injuries and illnesses. In addition, physicians from the Local Organising Committee at the medical centres reported the injuries and illnesses of the athletes they treated.

Definitions of injury and illness

Any musculoskeletal complaint and concussion newly incurred due to competition or training during the study period was regarded as an injury.19 An illness was defined as any physical complaint unrelated to an injury incurred during the same period.22 A detailed description of the injury definition criteria as well as the illness definition has been published previously.2 19 20 22

Injury and illness report form

The injury part of the daily report form was identical to the one used during the 2008 Olympic Games. The illness part of the report form was located on the same page and required the documentation of the following information: athlete's accreditation number, sport/event, diagnosis, date of occurrence, affected system main symptoms, causes of illness/symptoms and estimated duration of the subsequent absence from competition and/or training. For affected system, main symptoms and cause of illness/symptoms a coding system was provided on the back of the form (see table 1). The injury and illness report form was available in seven languages (English, French, Spanish, German, Russian Arabic and Chinese). These report forms were supplied to every national medical team with additional information in a booklet.

Table 1

Categories for the coding of illnesses

Data analysis

The following parameters were analysed for risk evaluation of the athletes:

  • Gender

  • Age (≤20 years of age, 21–25, 26–30, ≥31 years of age)

  • Severity (time loss, no-time loss)

  • Circumstance (training, competition)

  • Type of event (Sprints: 100 m, 200 m, 400 m, 4 × 100 m, 4 × 400 m; Middle distances: 800 m, 1500 m; Long distances: 3000 m steeple, 5000 m, 10 000 m, marathon; Race walking: 20 km, 50 km; Hurdles: 100/110 m, 400 m; Jumps: high, long, triple, pole vault; Throws: shot put, javelin, hammer, discus; Combined events: decathlon, heptathlon).

All data were processed using Excel. Response rate, coverage and incidences were calculated in accordance with the IOC approach for injury surveillance,19 and previous studies during large international competitions.2 20 22 Statistical methods applied were means, frequencies with SD, cross-tabulations, t test and χ2 test. Significance was accepted at p≤0.05.

Confidentiality and ethical approval

The athletes' accreditation number was used only to avoid duplicate reporting from team and LOC physicians and to provide information on age, gender and national federation of the athlete from the IAAF database. All injury and illness reports were stored in a locked filing cabinet and were made anonymous after the Championships. Confidentiality of all information was ensured so that no individual athlete or team could be identified. Ethical approval was obtained from the Oslo University School of Medicine Ethical Committee.

Results

Response rate and coverage of athletes

In addition to the LOC medical centres, 47 medical teams out of 200 national federations covering 1486 of 1979 registered athletes (75.1%) participated in the data collecting process. A total of 382 injury and illness report forms were returned. Most of the countries participating in the study, including all countries with more than 20 registered athletes, returned all 9 injury report forms, resulting in a response rate of 90.3%. The number of injuries and illnesses reported by the national teams was similar to the number reported by the LOC medical centres (131/137 for injuries and 73/76 for illnesses, respectively). Thirty-two injuries and 16 illnesses were reported from both sources.

Frequency and characteristics of injury

A total of 236 injury incidents with 262 injured body parts (six cases missing location) and 268 injury types (two cases missing injury type) were reported, with a total incidence of 135.4±16.2 injuries per 1000 registered athletes. Almost 80% of the injuries affected the lower extremity. The thigh (25.6%) and the lower leg (21.0%) were most frequently injured, followed by the knee (9.5%). The trunk accounted for 13.0% of all injuries. The most frequent types of injury were strains (20.1%) and muscle cramps (21.6%), followed by skin lacerations (18.3%), tendinosis (10.8%) and sprain (6.3%). The most common diagnosis was thigh strain (n=37; 13.8%), followed by lower leg laceration (n=23, 8.6%) and muscle cramps of the thigh and lower leg (n=22, 8.2% and n=17, 6.3%). For details on affected body part and injury diagnoses see table 2.

Table 2

Number (%) and diagnosis of all injuries and injuries that were expected to result in time-loss from sport in male and female athletes

Circumstance, causes and severity of injury

Most injuries occurred during competition (n=220; 85.9%), while only 36 occurred during training. This information was missing for 12 injuries. Injuries during training and in competition were similar regarding location, type of injury and proportion of time-loss injuries, but significant differences were observed for the cause of injury (χ2=66.1; p=0.001), especially for contact (2.0±2.0 vs 18.7±6.0 injuries per 1000 registered athletes) and overuse injuries (8.6±4.1 vs 41.4±9.0).

Overuse injuries were dominant (44.1%), either with gradual (15.3%) or sudden onset (28.8%), followed by non-contact trauma (12.7%) and contact with another athlete (11.9%). Recurrence of previous injury (10.6%) and contact with a fixed object (5.5%) were more frequent than playing field conditions (2.1%), equipment failure and weather conditions (each 0.8%). For four injuries, more than one cause was stated. In 8.5% of the cases, the cause of injury was classified as ‘other’ or not specified.

The most frequent localisation for recurrent injuries was the thigh (n=10) followed by the knee and ankle (three each). Ten recurrent injuries were strains and five were diagnosed as tendinopathies. Half of them required rest from sporting activities; six athletes for up to 4 weeks, and four athletes for more than 1 month.

Information in relation to time-loss from sport after injury was available for 210 out of 236 injury incidents (89.0%). Ninety-two injuries (43.8%) were expected to prevent the athlete from participating in competition or training, resulting in an incidence of 46.5±9.5 time-loss injuries per 1000 registered athletes. Half of the thigh injuries lead to time-loss from sport and accounting for more than one third of all injuries with absence from sport. Physicians estimated that 129 (57.6%) injuries would result in no absence from sports, 50 (22.3%) in absence of 1–7 days, 35 (15.6%) in absence for more than a week but less than a month and 10 (4.5%) for more than 4 weeks absence. Injuries with and without subsequent time-loss from sport differed significantly in location (χ2=54.4; p=0.015) and type (χ2=51.7; p≤0.001), but not in cause of injury. The 10 injuries with more than 4 weeks absence were three thigh strains, three tendinopathies (one of each: the shoulder, the groin and the ankle), a stress fracture of the foot, a tendon rupture in the lower leg, an ankle sprain and a painful hallux valgus. In addition, a scapula fracture was reported but information on duration of absence was missing for this injury.

Age, sex and sport of the injured athletes

The age of the injured athletes ranged between 17 and 40 years. Most injuries occurred to athletes between 26 and 30 years of age (179.69±32.8 vs 111.95±18.0 injuries per 1000 athletes, respectively). One-hundred and forty-four injuries occurred in male and 91 in female athletes (the gender of one athlete is missing). Male athletes suffered more injuries than their female counterparts (148.0±22.9 vs 119.2±22.6 per 1000 athletes, respectively), especially more Achilles tendon/ankle/foot (30.5±10.4 vs 16.7±8.5, respectively) and hip/groin/thigh injuries (47.2±12.9 vs 32.3±11.8, respectively). Injuries to the knee were more often reported in women (15.6±8.2 vs 10.2±6.0 injuries per 1000 athletes, respectively). Male athletes suffered more time-loss injuries than women (50.9±13.4 vs 41.2±13.3 injuries per 1000 athletes) (table 3).

Table 3

Number of competing athletes, injuries and injury risk in competition of different events

Athletes performing in combined events (171.4±97.0) and in middle and long-distance events (158.6±31.9) had the highest propensity to incur an injury (table 4).

Table 4

Athletes, exposure, injury and illness in different event groups

Frequency and characteristics of illness

A total of 135 illnesses in 132 athletes were reported, signifying an incidence of 68.2±11.5 per 1000 registered athletes. About a third of the illnesses affected the respiratory tract (n=48; 35.6%), followed by the cardio-vascular (n=30; 22.2%) and gastro-intestinal system (n=22; 16.3%). Dermatological problems were rarely reported (n=11; 8.1%) and uro-genital complaints only in female athletes (n=7). The most commonly reported symptom was pain (n=53; 31.0%), followed by diarrhoea/vomiting (n=21; 12.3%) and dyspnoea/cough (n=18; 10.5%). Fever, lethargy/dizziness and dehydration accounted for 16 (9.4%) each. No episodes of syncope were recorded, however, seven cardio-vascular related collapses were identified. Infection was the most frequently reported cause (n=44; 32.1%), followed by exercise induced illnesses (n=40; 29.2%). A reported gastro-intestinal illness was ascribed to the use of medication. Upper respiratory tract infection was the most common diagnosis (n=41; 30.4%) followed by dehydration (n=23; 17.0%) and gastroenteritis/diarrhoea (n=12; 8.9%).

More illnesses were reported for female than male athletes (83.5±18.9 vs 55.5±14.0 illnesses per 1000 athletes, respectively), especially gastro-intestinal (16.7±8.5 vs 6.5±4.8 illness per 1000 athletes). The number of illnesses increased significantly with age (≤20 years: 45.7±29.8, 21–25 years: 58.8±16.5; 26–30 years: 70.3±20.5; ≥30 years: 103.3±36.4 illnesses per 1000 athletes).

The highest incidence of illness was found in athletes performing in race walking events with 149.7±62.5 illnesses per 1000 registered athletes, and the lowest was for throwing and jumping athletes (31.0±14.0) and athletes performing distances up to 1500 m (52.7±13.6).

Forty-six (45.5%) illnesses were expected to result in time-loss from sport, inferring that only 2.2% of all registered athletes incurred a time-loss illness.

Discussion

This study aimed to register and analyse all injuries and illnesses of athletes participating in the 12th IAAF World Championships in Athletics in Berlin (Germany). This is the second injury and the first illness survey during an international track and field competition. The results indicate that the surveillance system was feasible and accepted by both the national and the local medical staff. The report form was completed with very few missing values, and the data suggest that the injury surveillance system covered almost all athletes.

One in eight registered athletes incurred an injury during the 9 days of the Championships or 135 injuries per 1000 accredited athletes, which is a higher incidence than at the 2007 IAAF World Championship in Osaka (97 injuries per 1000 athletes),2 probably because of the better response rate at the 2009 Championships. The injury rate is similar to the 2008 Summer Olympic Games in athletics20 and the 2010 Winter Olympic Games,21 however, markedly higher than during the 2009 FINA World Aquatic Champions (66.0±9.9).22 The incidence of time-loss injuries in competition in the present study (46.5±9.5 per 1000 participations) was slightly lower than in the previous World Champions in Athletics (63.3±12.1)2 but substantially higher than the incidence in the 2009 FINA World Aquatic Champions (8.1±3.5 per 1000 athletes).22

The higher incidence of injuries of athletes from 26 to 30 years old is consistent with other findings in Athletics3 and could be attributed to a higher intensity and volume of training regimes. Males suffered more time-loss injuries than female athletes as found in collegiate athletes, whereas non-time loss injuries were comparable for both gender.23 Such comparison, however, should be interpreted with caution since Athletics includes various events (eg, 100 m sprint, hammer throw, marathon) in which one participation greatly differs from another, and likewise does the injury rate. Single sport athletes may be more aware of signals indicating a beginning illness or injuries, hence consulting their team physician earlier and more regularly. Most reported injuries occurred during competition, similar to previous event in athletics,2 the FINA World Aquatic Championships 200922 and the Summer Olympic Games 2008.20

Most of the injuries involved the lower extremity (79.8%) which is similar to previous studies in Athletics.2 4 12 13 18 The most prevalent diagnosis in terms of occurrence and time-loss in the present study was thigh strain, which was the second most frequent diagnosis after stress fractures reported by Bennell and Crossley.4 During the present as well as during the previous IAAF World Championships,2 five athletes incurred a stress fracture. The high incidence of stress fractures in track and field has been discussed previously.24,,26

In a recent publication of a 14-year observational period of elite track and field athletes in Germany, the foot was the most injured body part (33%) followed by the knee (17.6%) and the thigh (13.7%).18 Similar to our results, more thigh injuries were found in male than in female athletes, which could be explained by an increased muscle mass. The higher incidence of knee injuries in younger athletes was thought to be due to the increased risk of injury in the developing musculoskeletal system. In jumping events, female athletes showed more foot injuries, however, less knee injuries than their male counterparts, explained by different jumping techniques.15 Due to the low number of injuries in the present study, these results did not reach statistical significance.

The majority of injuries in the present study were caused by overuse which is in accordance with previous reports on injuries in Athletics.2 4 27 28 In contrast to the study of Bennell and Crossley,4 the rate of recurrence of a previous injury was much lower (33% vs 10%), most likely due to the short data collection period and because the team physicians were asked to report ‘newly incurred’ injuries. Extrinsic causes such as weather conditions, equipment failure and playing field conditions were also infrequent.

Information about newly incurred illnesses during a major sport event is scarce. During the 2009 FINA World Aquatic Championships, 71.0 illnesses per 1000 athletes were reported and 72.1 during the XXI Vancouver Winter Olympic Games 2010 which is similar to the present study.21 22 As in track and field athletes, the main cause was infection, with the respiratory tract being the most commonly affected system. Evidence from several cross-sectional and prospective studies suggests that many elite and highly trained athletes experience more common colds or upper respiratory tract infections than recreational athletes.29 30 This is supported by our findings. However, the incidence of respiratory tract affection was substantially higher and gastro-intestinal manifestation lower in winter21 and aquatic20 sport than in track and field. Complaints related to exertional heat illness in our study were comparable to some other reports.31 Only one complaint was attributed to the use of medication. Considering the frequent use of medication reported previously,32 more could have been expected. In 12 previous track and field Championships,32 19.2% of participating athletes reported to have taken NSAIDs and 3.8% antibiotics. This information led us to anticipate relatively frequent gastro-intestinal and dehydration-related symptoms.32

Interestingly, race walking and hurdles athletes showed higher incidence of illnesses than sprints, middle and long-distance athletes. Immunological factors may play a role.33 Studies on a larger scale are needed to evaluate predisposing factors of different sports for illnesses.

Conclusions

The IOC injury surveillance system with the addition of illnesses proved to be accepted by the team physicians and feasible in individual sport competitions. Results from the IAAF World Championships in Athletics are in accordance with previous publications on track and field and can be compared with studies of other sports tournaments using the same methodology. Approximately 10% of the registered athletes incurred an injury during the Championships. Injury risks varied substantially between the events with athletes competing in combined events and long-distance events having the highest hazard. In athletics, preventive interventions should mainly focus on overuse injuries and adequate rehabilitation of previous injuries. As most illnesses were caused by infection of the respiratory tract or were environmentally related, preventive interventions should focus on decreasing the risk of transmission, appropriate event scheduling and heat acclimatisation.

Acknowledgments

The authors highly appreciate the cooperation of the team physicians and the medical staff of the IAAF World Championships who volunteered their time to collect the data for this project. The authors thank Professor Lars Brechtel for providing the injury and illness data from the polyclinic and venues in Berlin. The authors gratefully acknowledge Agnés Gaillard and Gudrun Grasshoff for their valuable assistance in collecting of injury and illness report forms and input of data. The authors gratefully acknowledge the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF), the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) for their support and the funding of the study.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Oslo University School of Medicine Ethical Committee

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.