rss
Br J Sports Med 2010;44:606-608 doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.051128
  • Short report

Validity of three accelerometers during treadmill walking and motor vehicle travel

  1. Matthew Maddocks1,
  2. Andrea Petrou2,
  3. Lindsay Skipper1,
  4. Andrew Wilcock2
  1. 1Division of Physiotherapy Education, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
  2. 2Department of Palliative Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Matthew Maddocks, Division of Physiotherapy Education, Clinical Sciences Building, Hucknall Road,Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; matthew.maddocks{at}nottingham.ac.uk
  • Accepted 18 July 2008
  • Published Online First 13 August 2008

Abstract

Objective To determine the relative accuracy during treadmill walking and motor vehicle travel of the ActivPAL, PALlite and Digi-Walker accelerometers.

Methods Forty healthy volunteers wearing all accelerometers undertook either five treadmill walks (n=20) at speeds ranging between 0.6 and 1.4 m/s or a 15 min motor vehicle journey (n=20). Step counts recorded by each accelerometer were compared with the actual step count determined by video analysis (treadmill walking) or with an actual step count of zero (motor vehicle). Mean percentage measurement error was calculated and compared between devices by one-way ANOVA and Student t test.

Results For treadmill walking, the measurement error was lowest for the ActivPAL, with no significant differences between the ActivPAL and the PALlite monitors. The measurement error was significantly higher for the Digi-Walker at speeds of ≤1 m/s. During vehicle travel erroneous steps were recorded by the PALlite (254 steps) and Digi-Walker (25 steps), but not the ActivPAL monitor (0 steps).

Conclusions The ActivPAL accelerometer accurately measures step count over a range of walking speeds and, unlike the other accelerometers tested, is not falsely triggered by motor vehicle travel.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Nottingham Medical School Ethics Committee (PT/I/8/2007, A/6/2007).

  • Patient consent Obtained.

Latest from BJSM blog

Latest from BJSM blog

Register for free content


Free sample
This recent issue is free to all users to allow everyone the opportunity to see the full scope and typical content of BJSM.
View free sample issue >>

Free archive
The full back archive is now available for BJSM. Institutional subscribers may access the entire archive as part of their subscription. Personal subscribers will also have access to all content when logged in. Non-subscribers who register have free access to all articles published before 2006, back to volume 1 issue 1.
Register to access the free archive >>

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the articles as they are published.


  • BJSM blog now on Kindle