Article Text

PDF
Comparisons of leisure-time physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness as predictors of all-cause mortality in men and women
  1. D-C Lee1,
  2. X Sui1,
  3. F B Ortega2,3,
  4. Y-S Kim4,
  5. T S Church5,
  6. R A Winett6,
  7. U Ekelund7,
  8. P T Katzmarzyk8,
  9. S N Blair1,9
  1. 1Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
  2. 2Unit for Preventive Nutrition, Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institute, Hugginge, Sweden
  3. 3Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
  4. 4Department of Physical Education, College of Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
  5. 5Department of Preventive Medicine Research, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
  6. 6Center for Research in Health Behavior, Department of Psychology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  7. 7Medical Research Council, Epidemiology Unit, Cambridge, UK
  8. 8Population Science, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
  9. 9Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Duck-Chul Lee, Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; lee23{at}mailbox.sc.edu

Abstract

Objective To examine the combined associations and relative contributions of leisure-time physical activity (PA) and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) with all-cause mortality.

Design Prospective cohort study.

Setting Aerobics centre longitudinal study.

Participants 31 818 men and 10 555 women who received a medical examination during 1978–2002.

Assessment of risk factors Leisure-time PA assessed by self-reported questionnaire; CRF assessed by maximal treadmill test.

Main outcome measures All-cause mortality until 31 December 2003.

Results There were 1492 (469 per 10 000) and 230 (218 per 10 000) deaths in men and women, respectively. PA and CRF were positively correlated in men (r=0.49) and women (r=0.47) controlling for age (p<0.001 for both). PA was inversely associated with mortality in multivariable Cox regression analysis among men, but the association was eliminated after further adjustment for CRF. No significant association of PA with mortality was observed in women. CRF was inversely associated with mortality in men and women, and the associations remained significant after further adjustment for PA. In the PA and CRF combined analysis, compared with the reference group “not meeting the recommended PA (<500 metabolic equivalent-minute/week) and unfit”, the relative risks (95% CIs) of mortality were 0.62 (0.54 to 0.72) and 0.61 (0.44 to 0.86) in men and women “not meeting the recommended PA and fit”, 0.96 (0.61 to 1.53) and 0.93 (0.33 to 2.58) in men and women “meeting the recommended PA and unfit” and 0.60 (0.51 to 0.70) and 0.56 (0.37 to 0.85) in men and women “meeting the recommended PA and fit”, respectively.

Conclusions CRF was more strongly associated with all-cause mortality than PA; therefore, improving CRF should be encouraged in unfit individuals to reduce risk of mortality and considered in the development of future PA guidelines.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Funding This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AG06945 and HL62508 and in part by an unrestricted research grant from the Coca-Cola Company. This work was also supported by Korea NEST Foundation for the Next Generation Sports Talent, Spanish Ministry of Education (EX-2008-0641) and European Community Sixth RTD Framework Programme (Contract FOOD-CT-2005-007034).

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval The study was approved annually by the Cooper Institute Institutional Review Board, and all participants gave written informed consent.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.