Article Text

PDF
Reliability and validity of three pain provocation tests used for the diagnosis of chronic proximal hamstring tendinopathy
  1. Angelo Cacchio1,
  2. Fabrizio Borra2,
  3. Gabriele Severini3,
  4. Andrea Foglia4,
  5. Frank Musarra5,
  6. Nicola Taddio6,
  7. Fosco De Paulis7
  1. 1Department of Health Sciences, University of L’Aquila, School of Medicine, L’Aquila, Italy
  2. 2Department of Physiotherapy, Fisiology Center, Forlì, Italy
  3. 3Department of Physiotherapy, Catholic University “Sacro Cuore”, Milano, Italy
  4. 4Department of Physiotherapy, Centro “Riabilita”, Civitanova Marche (MC), Italy
  5. 5Department of Physiotherapy Centro “Lovanium”, Pesaro, Italy
  6. 6Department of Physiotherapy Centro “FKT Filanda”, Cittadella (PD), Italy
  7. 7Division of Diagnostic Imaging, “Valle Giulia Clinic”, Roma, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Angelo Cacchio, University of L’Aquila, P.le Salvatore Tommasi 1, L’Aquila, 67100 Italy; angelo.cacchio{at}tin.it

Abstract

Background The clinical assessment of chronic proximal hamstring tendinopathy (PHT) in athletes is a challenge to sports medicine. To be able to compare the results of research and treatments, the methods used to diagnose and evaluate PHT must be clearly defined and reproducible.

Objective To assess the reliability and validity of three pain provocation tests used for the diagnosis of PHT.

Methods Ninety-two athletes with (N=46) and without (N=46) PHT were examined by one physician and two physiotherapists, who were trained in the examination techniques before the study. The examiners were blinded to the symptoms and identity of the athletes. The three pain provocation tests examined were the Puranen–Orava, bent-knee stretch and modified bent-knee stretch tests. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on the repeated measures analysis of variance were used to analyse the intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability, while sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios were used to determine the validity of the three tests.

Results The ICC values in all three tests revealed a high correlation (range 0.82 to 0.88) for the interexaminer reliability and a high-to-very high correlation (range 0.87 to 0.93) for the intraexaminer reliability. All three tests displayed a moderate-to-high validity, with the highest degree of validity being yielded by the modified bent-knee stretch test.

Conclusion All three pain provocation tests proved to be of potential value in assessing chronic PHT in athletes. However, we recommend that they be used in conjunction with other objective measures, such as MRI.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles