Article Text

PDF
Sudden cardiac death screening in adolescent athletes: an evaluation of compliance with national guidelines
  1. Nicolas L Madsen1,
  2. Jonathan A Drezner2,
  3. Jack C Salerno3
  1. 1Department of Pediatrics (Division of Pediatric Cardiology), University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
  2. 2Deptartment of Family Medicine (Division of Sports Medicine), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  3. 3Deptartment of Pediatrics (Division of Pediatric Cardiology), University of Washington, Washington DC, USA
  1. Correspondence to Nicolas L Madsen, Department of Pediatrics (Division of Pediatric Cardiology), University of Cincinnati, 3333 Burnet Ave, MLC 2003: Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; nicolas.madsen{at}cchmc.org

Abstract

Objective In the USA, the preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) is the standard of care for screening eight million high-school athletes for their risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Our aim was to evaluate both physician and school compliance with national guidelines for SCD screening.

Methods We conducted a confidential survey of the Washington Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the Washington Academy of Family Physicians (WAFP) and Washington State high-school athletic directors. Responses were evaluated for compliance with the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for SCD screening.

Results We received a response rate of 72% (559/776) from the AAP, 56% (554/990) from the WAFP and 78% (317/409) from the athletic directors. Only 6% of all providers and 0% of schools were in compliance with AHA guidelines. In addition, 47% of the physicians and 6% of athletic directors reported awareness of the guidelines. There was no difference in compliance between physician specialties (p=0.20). Physician location, years of experience and exposure to SCD were not significantly associated with compliance. Provider knowledge of the guidelines, number of PPE/month and frequency of referrals to cardiology were all positively associated with improved overall compliance (p<0.05).

Conclusions Despite the unaltered presence of the AHA SCD screening guidelines for the past 15 years, compliance with the recommendations is poor. Lack of compliance does not reflect clinical experience, but rather lack of knowledge of the guidelines themselves. New directions for provider education and policy requirements are needed to improve this implementation gap.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.