Article Text

PDF
An observational method to code concussions in the National Hockey League (NHL): the heads-up checklist
  1. Michael G Hutchison1,2,
  2. Paul Comper1,3,
  3. Willem H Meeuwisse4,
  4. Ruben J Echemendia5,6
  1. 1David L. MacIntosh Sport Medicine Clinic, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Injury Prevention Research Office, Keenan Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education & Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4Faculty of Kinesiology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Sport Injury Prevention Research Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  5. 5Psychological and Neurobehavioral Associates, Inc, State College, Pennsylvania, USA
  6. 6University of Missouri—Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michael G Hutchison David L. MacIntosh Sport Medicine Clinic, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto 55 Harbord Street, Toronto M5S 2W6, Ontario, Canada; michael.hutchison{at}utoronto.ca

Abstract

Background Development of effective strategies for preventing concussions is a priority in all sports, including ice hockey. Digital video records of sports events contain a rich source of valuable information, and are therefore a promising resource for analysing situational factors and injury mechanisms related to concussion.

Aim To determine whether independent raters reliably agreed on the antecedent events and mechanisms of injury when using a standardised observational tool known as the heads-up checklist (HUC) to code digital video records of concussions in the National Hockey League (NHL).

Methods The study occurred in two phases. In phase 1, four raters (2 naïve and 2 expert) independently viewed and completed HUCs for 25 video records of NHL concussions randomly chosen from the pool of concussion events from the 2006–2007 regular season. Following initial analysis, three additional factors were added to the HUC, resulting in a total of 17 factors of interest. Two expert raters then viewed the remaining concussion events from the 2006–2007 season, as well as all digital video records of concussion events up to 31 December 2009 (n=174).

Results For phase 1, the majority of the factors had a κ value of 0.6 or higher (8 of 15 factors for naïve raters; 11 of 15 factors for expert raters). For phase 2, all the factors had a total percent agreement value greater than 0.8 and κ values of >0.65 for the expert raters.

Conclusions HUC is an objective, reliable tool for coding the antecedent events and mechanisms of concussions in the NHL.

  • Concussion
  • Ice hockey
  • Injury Prevention

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles