You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Warm up
Who reviews the reviewers? Who edits the editors? Many avenues for you to hold BJSM accountable
Free
  1. Karim M Khan1,2,
  2. Babette M Pluim1,3
  1. 1British Journal of Sports Medicine, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Family Practice & Centre for Mobility and Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  3. 3Academic Center of Evidence based Sports medicine (ACES), Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Karim M Khan, Department of Family Practice & Centre for Mobility and Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3; karim.khan{at}ubc.ca

https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2015-095477

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Being open and transparent creates trust is one of the BMJ Publishing Group's nine values. Does the BJSM leadership team act openly and transparently to deserve the trust of our community? We put our case here but we leave the verdict to our valued readers and respected communities (including our 19 member societies who total over 12 000 subscribers).

    When we consider ‘BJSM’ we refer to the broad range of content that can be considered to start from bjsm.bmj.com. In addition to our 24 annual issues, BJSM is a dynamic, versatile contributor to health education and debate via >200 podcasts, 60 YouTube videos and >300 blog posts. We engage with a vast community on Facebook and Twitter—and these are two-way media where BJSM content can rapidly be tagged, trolled or trumpeted. In total, 4.5 million BJSM pages are viewed each year. If this volume of content did not generate debate and criticism it would be time to sack the Editorial team.

    Authors and BJSM peer review

    Peer review of around 1200 papers/year …

    View Full Text