Article Text

PDF
205
BACK PAIN RISK FACTORS IN ADOLESCENT ATHLETES: SUITABILITY OF A BIOMECHANICAL SCREENING TOOL?
  1. Steffen Mueller,
  2. Juliane Mueller,
  3. Josefine Stoll,
  4. Tilman Engel,
  5. Frank Mayer
  1. University Potsdam, Medical examination centre of the German Olympic Sports Federation, Potsdam, Germany

    Abstract

    Background Back pain (BP) is already a relevant injury site in adolescent athletes. A valid screening is essential for BP prevention.

    Objective To investigate whether a biomechanical screening tool (BST) is suitable to predict BP in adolescent athletes.

    Design Longitudinal analysis with 1.9±1.0 yrs between both measurement days.

    Setting Medical center of the German Olympic Sports Federation. BST was implemented in the annual (pre-participation) examination of elite athletes.

    Patients (or Participants) 343 athletes (195 males/148 females, 13±1 yrs, 164±12 cm, 53±13 kg, 5±3 training years, 8±6 training hours per week) out of 20 sport disciplines were included in the study.

    Interventions (or Assessment of Risk Factors) Subjective BP was assessed using a faces-pain-scale (FPS 1–5: 1=no pain; 2–5=slight- to maximum pain). In addition, postural control (one-legged stance), jumping performance (counter movement/drop jump), and maximum isokinetic trunk extension/flexion strength (60°/sec) was assessed for all athletes.

    Main Outcome Measurements Athletes were classified into 4 groups with respect to the course of back pain [(A) no BP (n=206); (B) BP-developers (n=34); (C) persisting BP (n=71); (D) diminishing BP (n=32)]. Outcomes included center of pressure displacement COP [mm], jump height [cm], peak jumping force [N], contact time [ms] and peak torque for trunk extension/flexion [Nm]. Descriptive analysis was followed by two-way ANOVA (repeated measures; α=0.05).

    Results Overall, the athletes enhanced trunk strength, jump performance and postural control across the evaluation period. Pain free athletes (A) showed statistically significant higher trunk strength gains (extension/flexion: +45/+37%) compared to athletes developing BP (B: +20/+9%; p<0.05). No differences were observed for jump performance and postural control (p>0.05).

    Conclusions Analysing biomechanical variables is valid to identify significantly impaired trunk strength development in athletes with BP incidence. In contrast, jump performance and postural control are of minor relevance. Therefore, poor trunk strength development could serve as back pain risk factor in athletes. Trunk strength training interventions should be recommended.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.