Article Text

PDF
309
INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC INJURY RISK FACTORS OF ELITE WINTER SPORTS ATHLETE IN TRAINING
  1. Victor Wang1,
  2. Frank Mayer1,
  3. Klaus Bonaventura2,
  4. Maria Wippert3
  1. 1Department of Sport Medicine & Sport Orthopaedics, University Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
  2. 2Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Ernst von Bergmann Klinikum, Potsdam, Germany
  3. 3Department of Sociology of Physical Activity & Health, University Potsdam, Potysdam, Germany

    Abstract

    Background Multi-factorial sport injury related models are well accepted for sport medicine scientists and experts. However, injury risk factors research involved with winter sport athletes seems not well documented due to its complicated, interactive intrinsic and extrinsic factors.

    Objective To exam the significant difference and correlation relationships between injury outcomes and winter sport elite athletes' intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors.

    Design and Setting A cross-section and retrospective risk of injury questionnaire (Risk-IQ) designed for elite athlete in training period was employed. Currently active and retired national delegation athletes of Olympic winter sports were recruited.

    Participants 34 winter Olympic sport elite athletes (f/m 13/21 age=28.9+-7.7) were recruited from national sport training centres, sport federations and universities fron both Germany and Taiwan.

    Assessment of Risk Factors Potential risk for athletic accumulated injuries were assessed through 6 intrinsic (age, gender, experience, stress, cardiovascular problems and importance of risk screening) and 6 extrinsic (nation, sport type, training environment, periodic health examination(PHE)/preparticipation evaluation (PPE), physical complains, medical care support) factors. Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test and Spearmann correlation test were used.

    Main Outcome Measurements The total sport training related injury incidences were planned as outcome measurements. The adapted intrinsic and extrinsic injury related risk factors were tested for significance difference and correlations.

    Results Significant results were found in intrinsic factors: age (10 body-part p<0.01; back & chest p<0.01; shoulder & arm p<0.01, elbow & hand p<0.01; hip & thigh p<0.01; knee p<0.05), stress level (knee r=0.348 p<0.05, foot & toe r=0.404 p<0.05); in extrinsic factors: nation (p<0.01), sport type(Olympic), PHE screen(back p<0.05, physical complain on knee(r=0.355, p<0.05l leg & ankle r=0.487 p<0.01) and foot (elbow & hand r=0.386, p<0.05).

    Conclusions Some factors showed their significant results with body-part specificity (only some body-parts but not others) which deserved further detailed investigation with greater subject population.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.