Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Assessing basketball ability in players with mental retardation
  1. Laura Guidetti (laura.guidetti{at}iusm.it)
  1. Department of Health Sciences, University IUSM of Rome, Italy
    1. Emanuele Franciosi (emanuelefranciosi{at}libero.it)
    1. Department of Health Sciences, University IUSM of Rome, Italy
      1. Gian Pietro Emerenziani (g.emerenziani{at}libero.it)
      1. Department of Health Sciences, University IUSM of Rome, Italy
        1. Maria Chiara Gallotta (maria.chiara80{at}hotmail.it)
        1. Department of Health Sciences, University IUSM of Rome, Italy
          1. Carlo Baldari (carlo.baldari{at}iusm.it)
          1. Department of Health Sciences, University IUSM of Rome, Italy

            Abstract

            Background: Although athletes with Mental Retardation (MR) have achieved an important role, literature concerning the evaluation tests in basketball is still poor.

            Objective: To assess basketball ability before and after a 4-month training performed before championship for athletes with MR and to correlate ability variations to MR levels.

            Methods: 15 trained basketball players with MR (11 males and 4 females; age range 21-43 years; MR: 3 Mild, 8 Moderate, 8 Severe and 1 Profound). Athletes were tested before (PRE) and after (POST) 4-months training preceding the championship. The tests assessed 4 levels of ability, each one characterized by 4 fundamental areas of this game: ball handling, reception, passing and shooting. Each area was divided in 5 specific components.

            Results: The team average score, based on the score of each athlete’s 4 levels, improved by 6.6 points (41.6 (11.9) v 48.2 (14.7)). The comparison between PRE and POST score in each level showed increases (p<0.01), especially in level II (14.4 (3.5) v 16.5 (3.3)) and in level III (7.1 (5.7) v 9.2 (6.6)). Within level II, ball handling (3.67 (1.2) v 4.37 (0.5); p<0.05) and passing (3.20 (1.2) v 3.97 (1.3); p<0.01) improved; in level III reception (3.21 (1.1) v 3.73 (1.1); p=0.01)and shooting (1.82 (1.1) v 2.45 (1.3); p<0.05) increased.

            Conclusions: A 4-month training caused a general improvement, especially evident in levels II and III. Total score reached in level II was negatively correlated to MR level (r=-0.56; p<0.05) indicating that athletes with lower MR obtained higher scores.

            Statistics from Altmetric.com

            Request permissions

            If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.