Background: Artificial turf is becoming increasingly popular, although the injury risk on newer turf generations is unknown. Hypothesis: To investigate the risk to injury on artificial turf versus natural grass among young female football players.
Study design: Prospective cohort study.
Methods: 2 020 players from 109 teams (15.4±0.8 years) participated in the study during the 2005 football season. All time-loss injuries and exposure data on different turf types were recorded throughout an eight-month period.
Results: A total of 421 (21%) sustained 526 injuries, leading to an injury incidence of 3.7 (95% CI 3.4 to 4.0) per 1000 playing hours. No difference was observed in the incidence of acute injuries on artificial turf compared to grass for match injuries (rate ratio RR=1.0 [0.8 to 1.3], P=.72) or training injuries (RR=1.0 [0.6 to 1.5], P=.93). In matches, the incidence of serious injuries was significantly higher on artificial turf (RR=2.0 [1.3 to 3.2], P=.03). Ankle sprains was the most common injury type (34% of all acute injuries), and there was a trend towards more ankle sprains on artificial turf than grass (RR=1.5, [1.0 to 2.2], P=.06).
Conclusion: Among young female football players, the overall risk of acute injuries was similar between artificial turf and natural grass.
- artificial turf
- injury risk
- shoe-surface friction
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.