Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Time to re-evaluate gender segregation in athletics?
  1. Bennett Foddy1,
  2. Julian Savulescu2
  1. 1James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  2. 2Oxford Uehiro Center for Practical Ethics, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bennett Foddy, Deputy Director and Senior Research Fellow, Programme on Ethics and the New Biosciences, James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford, Suite 8, 16-17 St Ebbes St, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK: bennett.foddy{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

The case of Caster Semenya provides a vivid illustration of the ways in which natural genetic variation can generate large differences in athletic performance. But since we normally segregate athletic sports along the lines of this particular variation—gender—her case also highlights problems with the current approach to justice in sporting competition. Female athletes seem to have a valid complaint when they are made to compete against athletes who are, in one sense or another, male. But once we recognise that gender is not a binary quantity, sex segregation in competitive sport must be seen as an inconsistent and unjust policy, no matter what stance we take on the goals of sport or on the regulation of doping.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.