Article Text

other Versions

PDF
The limits to exercise performance and the future of fatigue research
  1. F E Marino,
  2. M Gard,
  3. E J Drinkwater
  1. School of Human Movement Studies, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Frank E Marino, School of Human Movement Studies, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW 279, Australia; fmarino{at}csu.edu.au

Abstract

The study of human fatigue stretches back centuries and remains a significant part of medical and social discourse. In the exercise sciences fatigue is routinely related to the ability to produce muscle force or to the recovery from force decrements. However, the study of fatigue has by virtue of the experimental paradigm excluded the subjective sense a person attributes to an event or experience, thus reducing our overall understanding of the fatigue process. Modern studies report the causes of fatigue as either central or peripheral in origin. Although useful, this dichotomy can also exclude the individual subjective assessment. Furthermore, adhering dogmatically to set parameters is likely limiting the advancement of our understanding. A more realistic paradigm would permit the individual to use the sensory cues to adjust the effort along with the fatigue process rather than rely purely on feedback mechanisms. Therefore, bringing feedforward mechanisms of the brain into fatigue research perhaps represents the next phase in the unravelling of the fatigue process.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Patient consent Not obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.