Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Health risk for athletes at moderate altitude and normobaric hypoxia
  1. Kai Schommer1,
  2. Elmar Menold1,
  3. Andrew W Subudhi2,
  4. Peter Bärtsch1
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
  2. 2Department of Biology and Altitude Research Center, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs and Anschutz Medical Campuses, Aurora, Aurora, USA
  1. Correspondence to Professor Peter Bärtsch, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; peter.bartsch{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de

Abstract

Altitudes at which athletes compete or train do usually not exceed 2000–2500 m. At these moderate altitudes acute mountain sickness (AMS) is mild, transient and affects at the most 25% of a tourist population at risk. Unpublished data included in this review paper demonstrate that more intense physical activity associated with high-altitude training or mountaineering does not increase prevalence or severity of AMS at these altitudes. These conclusions can also be extended to the use of normobaric hypoxia, as data in this paper suggest that the severity of AMS is not significantly different between hypobaric and normobaric hypoxia at the same ambient pO2. Furthermore, high-altitude cerebral or pulmonary oedema do not occur at these altitudes and intermittent exposure to considerably higher altitudes (4000–6000 m) used by athletes for hypoxic training are too short to cause acute high-altitude illnesses. Even moderate altitude between 2000 and 3000 m can, however, exacerbate cardiovascular or pulmonary disease or lead to a first manifestation of undiagnosed illness in older people that may belong to the accompanying staff of athletes. Moderate altitudes may also lead to splenic infarctions in healthy athletes with sickle cell trait.

  • Altitude
  • Training
  • Outdoor medicine
  • Mountains
  • Elite performance

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.