Article Text

other Versions

PDF
Eccentric training for prevention of hamstring injuries may depend on intervention compliance: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  1. Adam P Goode1,
  2. Michael P Reiman1,
  3. Lloyd Harris1,
  4. Lucia DeLisa1,
  5. Aaron Kauffman1,
  6. David Beltramo1,
  7. Charles Poole2,
  8. Leila Ledbetter3,
  9. Andrea B Taylor1
  1. 1Duke Physical Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  2. 2Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
  3. 3Duke University, Medical Center Library, Durham, North Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Adam P Goode, Duke Physical Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 West Main Street, Durham, NC 27705, USA; adam.goode{at}duke.edu

Abstract

Background Hamstring injury is a prevalent muscle injury in sports. Inconclusive evidence exists for eccentric hamstring strengthening to prevent hamstring injuries. One reason for this discrepancy may be the influence intervention non-compliance has on individual study estimates, and therefore pooled estimates.

Objective This systematic review aims to determine the effect of eccentric hamstring strengthening on the risk of hamstring injury and quantitatively explores the impact of intervention non-compliance on the precision, heterogeneity and strength of pooled estimates.

Methods A computer-assisted literature search of Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, AMED, SportDiscus and PEDro databases was conducted with keywords related to eccentric strengthening and hamstring injury. The search was conducted from the end of a previous comprehensive review forward (1 December 2008 to 31 December 2013). Random-effects models were used for both main effects and a sensitivity analysis. Pooled estimate precision was measured with a confidence limit ratio (confidence limit ratio (CLR); upper limit divided by the lower limit) and heterogeneity was assessed with I2, Cochrane's-Q and τ2. A protocol was not registered for this review.

Results Four out of 349 studies met the inclusion criteria. In main effects analysis, eccentric hamstring training did not reduce the risk of hamstring injury (risk ratio [RR]=0.59 ((95% CI 0.24 to 1.44)). This estimate was imprecise (CLR=6.0) with significant heterogeneity (p value 0.02, 69.6% variation and t2=0.57). Subjects compliant with eccentric strengthening had a significant (RR=0.35 ((95% CI 0.23 to 0.55)) reduction in hamstring injuries. This estimate was precise (CLR=2.4) and homogenous (p value=0.38, 2.8% variation and t2=0.007).

Conclusions The null-biased effect in using intent-to-treat methods from intervention non-compliance has a substantial impact on the precision, heterogeneity and the direction and strength of pooled estimates. Eccentric strengthening, with good compliance, appears to be successful in prevention of hamstring injury.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.