Article Text

other Versions

PDF
The efficacy of a supervised and a home-based core strengthening programme in adults with poor core stability: a three-arm randomised controlled trial
  1. V H Chuter1,2,
  2. X A K Janse de Jonge2,3,
  3. B M Thompson3,
  4. R Callister2,4
  1. 1School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Australia
  2. 2Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Australia
  3. 3School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Australia
  4. 4School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Australia
  1. Correspondence to V H Chuter, School of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah NSW 2258, Australia; Vivienne.Chuter{at}newcastle.edu.au

Abstract

Background Poor core stability is linked to a range of musculoskeletal pathologies and core-strengthening programmes are widely used as treatment. Treatment outcomes, however, are highly variable, which may be related to the method of delivery of core strengthening programmes. We investigated the effect of identical 8 week core strengthening programmes delivered as either supervised or home-based on measures of core stability.

Methods Participants with poor core stability were randomised into three groups: supervised (n=26), home-based (n=26) or control (n=26). Primary outcomes were the Sahrmann test and the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) for dynamic core stability and three endurance tests (side-bridge, flexor and Sorensen) for static core stability. The exercise programme was devised and supervised by an exercise physiologist.

Results Analysis of covariance on the change from baseline over the 8 weeks showed that the supervised group performed significantly better on all core stability measures than both the home-based and control group. The home-based group produced significant improvements compared to the control group in all static core stability tests, but not in most of the dynamic core stability tests (Sahrmann test and two out of three directions of the SEBT).

Conclusions Our results support the use of a supervised core-strengthening programme over a home-based programme to maximise improvements in core stability, especially in its dynamic aspects. Based on our findings in healthy individuals with low core stability, further research is recommended on potential therapeutic benefits of supervised core-strengthening programmes for pathologies associated with low core stability.

Trial registration number ACTRN12613000233729.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.