Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Various scoring systems have been proposed to quantify the disability caused by knee ligament injuries and to evaluate the results of treatment. None of these systems has found worldwide acceptance, mainly because all scoring systems attribute numerical values to factors that are not quantifiable, and then the arbitrary scores are added together for parameters not comparable with each other. For these reasons a group of knee surgeons from Europe and America met in 1987 and founded the International Knee Documentation Committee (1KDC). A common terminology and an evaluation form was created. This form is the standard form for all publications on results of treatment of knee ligament injuries. It is a concise one-page form. It includes a documentation section, a qualification section and a evaluation section. For evaluation there are four problem areas (subjective assessment, symptoms, range of motion and ligament examination). These are supplemented with four additional areas that are only documented but not included in the evaluation (compartmental findings, donor site pathology, X-ray findings and functional tests). The form can be used pre- and postoperatively and at follow-up. It has been specified that in any publication the minimum follow-up time for shortterm results should be 2 years, for medium-term results 5 years and for long-term results 10 years. The largest part of the sheet is the qualification section. It is called “qualification” section rather than “scoring” section because no scores are given. Each parameter is qualified as “normal”, “nearly normal”, “abnormal” or “severely abnormal”. This qualification is less subjective and emotional than “very good”, “good”, “fair” and “poor”. No knee and no knee function can be better than normal, and it is rather doubtful whether any knee, once operated on, can ever be “normal” again. For evaluation, the parameters of the four problem ares “subjective assessment”, “symptoms”, “range of motion” and “ligament examination”, are qualified for the group qualification. The worst qualification within the group gives the group qualification. The worst group qualification gives the final evaluation. If the knee is abnormal in any of the problem areas, it cannot be a “normal” knee. For chronic knee conditions there is also the possibility of evaluating the sum of levels of improvement or deterioration of all groups compared with the preoperative evaluation. The committee also recommends that terms describing knee ligament problems should be used according to the definitions of Noyes et al. [32]. The use of the IKDC evaluation form will reveal less favourable results than those evaluated with other current evaluation forms, because a still existing knee problem cannot be hidden with a high numerical score that is added up from other, unrelated parameters. It is to be hoped, however, that the use of this new form will enable us to compare treatment methods in various publications with each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amirault JD, Cameron JC, MacIntosh DL, Marks P (1988) Chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Long-term results of MacIntosh's lateral substitution reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:622–624

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson C, Gillquist J (1990) Instrumented testing for evaluation of sagittal knee laxity. Clin Orthop 256:178–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Apley AG (1990) Assessment on assessment (editorial). J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:957–958

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold JA, Coker TP, Heaton LM, Park JP, Harris WD (1979) Natural history of anterior eruciate tears. Am J Sports Med 7:305–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W (1990) Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior eruciate ligament deficient knees. Clin Orthop 255:204–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrack RL, Bruckner JD, Kneisl J, Imman WS, Alexander AH (1990) The outcome of nonoperatively treated complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in active young adults. Clin Orthop 259:192–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Benedetto KP (1992) Internationaler Knieuntersuchungsbogen Mitteilungen der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Arthroskopie no 4

  8. Boszotta H, Helpersdorfer W, Freudenschuss B (1991) Die Bedeutung der Arthroskopie bei der Versorgung der anteromedialen Läsion des Kniegelenks. Ein Therapickonzept. Aktuel Traumatol 21:215–222

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med 13:401–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Debrunner HU (1982) Orthopädisches Diagnostikum. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  11. Delamertier RB, Hohl M, Hopp E (1990) Ligament injuries associated with tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop 250:226–233

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Edixhoven P, Huiskes R, de Graaf R (1989) Anteroposterior drawer measurements in the knee using an instrumented test device. Clin Orthop 247:232–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feagin JA, Blake WP (1983) Postoperative evaluation and result recording in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee. Clin Orthop 172:143–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fink C, Hoser C (1991) Die Ruptur des vorderen Kreuzbandes. Eine Langzeituntersuchung operative versus konservative Therapie. Dissertation, University of Innsbruck

  15. Forster IW, Warren Smith CD, Tew M AD (1989) Is the KT1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71:843–847

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman BL, Beaty JH, Haynes DB (1982) The pes anserinus transfer. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:202–207

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hefti F, Gaechter A, Jenny H Morscher E (1982) Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparative study of four different methods of reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 100:83–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hefti F, Drobny T, Hackenbruch W, Kipfer W, Holzach P (1991) Dokumentation und Evaluation von Knieinstabilitäten. In: Jakob RP, Staeubli HU (eds) Kniegelenk und Kreuzbänder. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 138–144

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hefti FL, Drobny T, Hackenbruch W, Kipfer WC, Holzach P, Jakob RP, Mueller W, Staeubli HU (1992) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries. The OAK and IKDC forms. In: The knee and the cruciate ligaments. Jakob RP Staeubli HU (eds) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 134–142

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jakob RP, Hassler H, Staeubli HU (1981) Observations on rotatory instability of the lateral compartment of the knee: experimental studies on the functional anatomy and the pathomechanism of the true and the reversed pivot shift sign. Acta Orthop Scand 52 Suppl 191

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jakob RP, Staeubli HU, Deland JT (1987) Grading pivot shift. Objective tests with implications for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69:294–299

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jensen JE, Slocum DB, Larson RL, James SL, Singer KM (1983) Reconstruction procedures for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a computer analysis of clinical results. Am J Sports Med 11:240–248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kramer KL, Maichl FP (1993) Scores, Bewertungsschemata und Klassifikationen in Orthopaedie und Traumatologie. Thieme. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  24. Larson R (1974) Rating sheet for knee function. In: Smillie I (ed) Diseases of the knee joint. Churchill-Livingstone Edinburgh, pp 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lukianov AV, Gillquist J, Grana WA, DeHaven K (1987) An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) evaluation format for assessment of artificial or autologous anterior cruciate reconstruction results. Clin Orthop 218:167–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall JF, Fetto JF, Botero PM (1977) Knee ligament injuries. A standardized evaluation method. Clin Orthop 123:115–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McQuade KJ, Sidles JA, Larson RV (1989) Reliability of the Genucom Knee Analysis System. A pilot study. Clin Orthop 245:216–219

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mueller W, Biedert R, Hefti F, Jakob RP, Munzinger U, Staeubli HU (1988) OAK knee evaluation. A new way to assess knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 232:37–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Noyes FR, Grood ES, Suntay WJ, Butler DL (1983) The threedimensional laxity of the anterior cruciate deficient knee as determined by clinical laxity tests. Iowa Orthop J 3:32

    Google Scholar 

  31. Noyes FR (1987) The Noyes knee rating system. Cincinnati Sportsmedicine Research and Education Foundation. Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  32. Noyes FR, Grood ES, Torzilli PA (1989) The definition of terms for motion and position of the knee and injuries of the ligaments. Current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71:465–472

    Google Scholar 

  33. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA (1989) A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop 246:238–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1990) Bone patellar ligament-bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:1125–1136

    Google Scholar 

  35. Noyes FR, Mooar LA, Barber SD (1991) The assessment of work related activities and limitations in knee disorders. Am J Sports Med 19:178–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Puddu G, Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Mariani PP (1988) Risultati della ricostruzione con il semitendinoso nelle lassità chroniche anteriori del ginocchio. G Ital Orthop Traumatol 14:189–196

    Google Scholar 

  37. Russe O, Gerhardt Y, King P (1972) An atlas of examination. Standard measurements and documentation in orthopaedics and traumatology. Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  38. Seto JL, Orofino AS, Morrissey MC, Medeiros JM, Mason WJ (1988) Assessment of quadriceps/hamstrings strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 16:170–180

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Staeubli HU, Jakob RP (1990) Assessment of posterior instability of the knee near extension. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:225–230

    Google Scholar 

  40. Staeubli HU, Jakob RP, Noesberger B (1985) Anterior-posterior knee instability and stress radiography. A prospective biomechanical analysis with the knee in extension. In: Perren SM, Schneider E (eds) Biomechanics-current interdisciplinary research. Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 397–402

    Google Scholar 

  41. Staeubli HU, Jakob RP, Noesberger B (1992) Anterior subluxation in knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of arthrometry and stressradiography. In: Jakob RP, Staeubli HU (eds) The knee and the cruciate ligaments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 134–142

    Google Scholar 

  42. Straub T, Hunter RE (1988) Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair. Clin Orthop 227:238–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Witvoet J, Christel P (1985) Treatment of chronic anterior knee instabilities with combined intra- and extraarticular augmented with carbon-PLA fibres. Clin Orthop 196:143–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wroble RR, Van Ginkel LA, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Shaffer BL (1990) Repeatability of the KT 1000 arthrometer in a normal population. Am J Sports Med 18:396–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zarins B, Rowe CR (1986) Combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus tendon and iliotibial tract. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68:160–177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hefti, E., Müller, W., Jakob, R.P. et al. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 1, 226–234 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560215

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560215

Key words

Navigation