Abstract
Various scoring systems have been proposed to quantify the disability caused by knee ligament injuries and to evaluate the results of treatment. None of these systems has found worldwide acceptance, mainly because all scoring systems attribute numerical values to factors that are not quantifiable, and then the arbitrary scores are added together for parameters not comparable with each other. For these reasons a group of knee surgeons from Europe and America met in 1987 and founded the International Knee Documentation Committee (1KDC). A common terminology and an evaluation form was created. This form is the standard form for all publications on results of treatment of knee ligament injuries. It is a concise one-page form. It includes a documentation section, a qualification section and a evaluation section. For evaluation there are four problem areas (subjective assessment, symptoms, range of motion and ligament examination). These are supplemented with four additional areas that are only documented but not included in the evaluation (compartmental findings, donor site pathology, X-ray findings and functional tests). The form can be used pre- and postoperatively and at follow-up. It has been specified that in any publication the minimum follow-up time for shortterm results should be 2 years, for medium-term results 5 years and for long-term results 10 years. The largest part of the sheet is the qualification section. It is called “qualification” section rather than “scoring” section because no scores are given. Each parameter is qualified as “normal”, “nearly normal”, “abnormal” or “severely abnormal”. This qualification is less subjective and emotional than “very good”, “good”, “fair” and “poor”. No knee and no knee function can be better than normal, and it is rather doubtful whether any knee, once operated on, can ever be “normal” again. For evaluation, the parameters of the four problem ares “subjective assessment”, “symptoms”, “range of motion” and “ligament examination”, are qualified for the group qualification. The worst qualification within the group gives the group qualification. The worst group qualification gives the final evaluation. If the knee is abnormal in any of the problem areas, it cannot be a “normal” knee. For chronic knee conditions there is also the possibility of evaluating the sum of levels of improvement or deterioration of all groups compared with the preoperative evaluation. The committee also recommends that terms describing knee ligament problems should be used according to the definitions of Noyes et al. [32]. The use of the IKDC evaluation form will reveal less favourable results than those evaluated with other current evaluation forms, because a still existing knee problem cannot be hidden with a high numerical score that is added up from other, unrelated parameters. It is to be hoped, however, that the use of this new form will enable us to compare treatment methods in various publications with each other.
References
Amirault JD, Cameron JC, MacIntosh DL, Marks P (1988) Chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Long-term results of MacIntosh's lateral substitution reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:622–624
Andersson C, Gillquist J (1990) Instrumented testing for evaluation of sagittal knee laxity. Clin Orthop 256:178–184
Apley AG (1990) Assessment on assessment (editorial). J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:957–958
Arnold JA, Coker TP, Heaton LM, Park JP, Harris WD (1979) Natural history of anterior eruciate tears. Am J Sports Med 7:305–313
Barber SD, Noyes FR, Mangine RE, McCloskey JW, Hartman W (1990) Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior eruciate ligament deficient knees. Clin Orthop 255:204–214
Barrack RL, Bruckner JD, Kneisl J, Imman WS, Alexander AH (1990) The outcome of nonoperatively treated complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament in active young adults. Clin Orthop 259:192–199
Benedetto KP (1992) Internationaler Knieuntersuchungsbogen Mitteilungen der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Arthroskopie no 4
Boszotta H, Helpersdorfer W, Freudenschuss B (1991) Die Bedeutung der Arthroskopie bei der Versorgung der anteromedialen Läsion des Kniegelenks. Ein Therapickonzept. Aktuel Traumatol 21:215–222
Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med 13:401–407
Debrunner HU (1982) Orthopädisches Diagnostikum. Thieme, Stuttgart
Delamertier RB, Hohl M, Hopp E (1990) Ligament injuries associated with tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop 250:226–233
Edixhoven P, Huiskes R, de Graaf R (1989) Anteroposterior drawer measurements in the knee using an instrumented test device. Clin Orthop 247:232–242
Feagin JA, Blake WP (1983) Postoperative evaluation and result recording in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee. Clin Orthop 172:143–147
Fink C, Hoser C (1991) Die Ruptur des vorderen Kreuzbandes. Eine Langzeituntersuchung operative versus konservative Therapie. Dissertation, University of Innsbruck
Forster IW, Warren Smith CD, Tew M AD (1989) Is the KT1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 71:843–847
Freeman BL, Beaty JH, Haynes DB (1982) The pes anserinus transfer. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:202–207
Hefti F, Gaechter A, Jenny H Morscher E (1982) Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparative study of four different methods of reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 100:83–94
Hefti F, Drobny T, Hackenbruch W, Kipfer W, Holzach P (1991) Dokumentation und Evaluation von Knieinstabilitäten. In: Jakob RP, Staeubli HU (eds) Kniegelenk und Kreuzbänder. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 138–144
Hefti FL, Drobny T, Hackenbruch W, Kipfer WC, Holzach P, Jakob RP, Mueller W, Staeubli HU (1992) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries. The OAK and IKDC forms. In: The knee and the cruciate ligaments. Jakob RP Staeubli HU (eds) Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 134–142
Jakob RP, Hassler H, Staeubli HU (1981) Observations on rotatory instability of the lateral compartment of the knee: experimental studies on the functional anatomy and the pathomechanism of the true and the reversed pivot shift sign. Acta Orthop Scand 52 Suppl 191
Jakob RP, Staeubli HU, Deland JT (1987) Grading pivot shift. Objective tests with implications for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69:294–299
Jensen JE, Slocum DB, Larson RL, James SL, Singer KM (1983) Reconstruction procedures for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a computer analysis of clinical results. Am J Sports Med 11:240–248
Kramer KL, Maichl FP (1993) Scores, Bewertungsschemata und Klassifikationen in Orthopaedie und Traumatologie. Thieme. Stuttgart
Larson R (1974) Rating sheet for knee function. In: Smillie I (ed) Diseases of the knee joint. Churchill-Livingstone Edinburgh, pp 29–30
Lukianov AV, Gillquist J, Grana WA, DeHaven K (1987) An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) evaluation format for assessment of artificial or autologous anterior cruciate reconstruction results. Clin Orthop 218:167–180
Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154
Marshall JF, Fetto JF, Botero PM (1977) Knee ligament injuries. A standardized evaluation method. Clin Orthop 123:115–129
McQuade KJ, Sidles JA, Larson RV (1989) Reliability of the Genucom Knee Analysis System. A pilot study. Clin Orthop 245:216–219
Mueller W, Biedert R, Hefti F, Jakob RP, Munzinger U, Staeubli HU (1988) OAK knee evaluation. A new way to assess knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 232:37–50
Noyes FR, Grood ES, Suntay WJ, Butler DL (1983) The threedimensional laxity of the anterior cruciate deficient knee as determined by clinical laxity tests. Iowa Orthop J 3:32
Noyes FR (1987) The Noyes knee rating system. Cincinnati Sportsmedicine Research and Education Foundation. Cincinnati
Noyes FR, Grood ES, Torzilli PA (1989) The definition of terms for motion and position of the knee and injuries of the ligaments. Current concepts review. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71:465–472
Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA (1989) A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop 246:238–249
Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1990) Bone patellar ligament-bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 72:1125–1136
Noyes FR, Mooar LA, Barber SD (1991) The assessment of work related activities and limitations in knee disorders. Am J Sports Med 19:178–188
Puddu G, Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Mariani PP (1988) Risultati della ricostruzione con il semitendinoso nelle lassità chroniche anteriori del ginocchio. G Ital Orthop Traumatol 14:189–196
Russe O, Gerhardt Y, King P (1972) An atlas of examination. Standard measurements and documentation in orthopaedics and traumatology. Huber, Bern
Seto JL, Orofino AS, Morrissey MC, Medeiros JM, Mason WJ (1988) Assessment of quadriceps/hamstrings strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 16:170–180
Staeubli HU, Jakob RP (1990) Assessment of posterior instability of the knee near extension. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 72:225–230
Staeubli HU, Jakob RP, Noesberger B (1985) Anterior-posterior knee instability and stress radiography. A prospective biomechanical analysis with the knee in extension. In: Perren SM, Schneider E (eds) Biomechanics-current interdisciplinary research. Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 397–402
Staeubli HU, Jakob RP, Noesberger B (1992) Anterior subluxation in knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a comparison of arthrometry and stressradiography. In: Jakob RP, Staeubli HU (eds) The knee and the cruciate ligaments. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 134–142
Straub T, Hunter RE (1988) Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair. Clin Orthop 227:238–250
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49
Witvoet J, Christel P (1985) Treatment of chronic anterior knee instabilities with combined intra- and extraarticular augmented with carbon-PLA fibres. Clin Orthop 196:143–153
Wroble RR, Van Ginkel LA, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Shaffer BL (1990) Repeatability of the KT 1000 arthrometer in a normal population. Am J Sports Med 18:396–399
Zarins B, Rowe CR (1986) Combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus tendon and iliotibial tract. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 68:160–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hefti, E., Müller, W., Jakob, R.P. et al. Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 1, 226–234 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560215
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560215