Skip to main content
Log in

MR observations of long-term musculotendon remodeling following a hamstring strain injury

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to use magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to investigate long-term changes in muscle and tendon morphology following a hamstring strain injury.

Materials and methods

MR images were obtained from 14 athletes who sustained a clinically diagnosed grade I–II hamstring strain injury between 5 and 23 months prior as well as five healthy controls. Qualitative bilateral comparisons were used to assess the presence of fatty infiltration and changes in morphology that may have arisen as a result of the previous injury. Hamstring muscle and tendon–scar volumes were quantified in both limbs for the biceps femoris long head (BFLH), biceps femoris short head (BFSH), the proximal semimembranosus tendon, and the proximal conjoint biceps femoris and semitendinosus tendon. Differences in muscle and tendon volume between limbs were statistically compared between the previously injured and healthy control subjects.

Results

Increased low-intensity signal was present along the musculotendon junction adjacent to the site of presumed prior injury for 11 of the 14 subjects, suggestive of persistent scar tissue. The 13 subjects with biceps femoris injuries displayed a significant decrease in BFLH volume (p < 0.01), often accompanied by an increase in BFSH volume. Two of these subjects also presented with fatty infiltration within the previously injured BFLH.

Conclusion

The results of this study provide evidence of long-term musculotendon remodeling following a hamstring strain injury. Additionally, many athletes are likely returning to sport with residual atrophy of the BFLH and/or hypertrophy of the BFSH. It is possible that long-term changes in musculotendon structure following injury alters contraction mechanics during functional movement, such as running and may contribute to reinjury risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garrett WE Jr. Muscle strain injuries. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24(6 Suppl): S2–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kujala UM, Orava S, Jarvinen M. Hamstring injuries. Current trends in treatment and prevention. Sports Med 1997; 23(6): 397–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seward H, Orchard J, Hazard H, Collinson D. Football injuries in Australia at the elite level. Med J Aust 1993; 159: 298–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Orchard JW. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors for muscle strains in Australian football. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29(3): 300–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Risk factors for injuries in football. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32(1 Suppl): 5S–16S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Woods C, Hawkins RD, Maltby S, Hulse M, Thomas A, Hodson A. The Football Association Medical Research Programme: an audit of injuries in professional football—analysis of hamstring injuries. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38(1): 36–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Orchard J, Seward H. Epidemiology of injuries in the Australian Football League, seasons 1997–2000. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36(1): 39–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Orchard J, Best TM. The management of muscle strain injuries: an early return versus the risk of recurrence. Clin J Sport Med 2002; 12(1): 3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brooks JH, Fuller CW, Kemp SP, Reddin DB. Incidence, risk, and prevention of hamstring muscle injuries in professional rugby union. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34(8): 1297–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koulouris G, Connell DA, Brukner P, Schneider-Kolsky M. Magnetic resonance imaging parameters for assessing risk of recurrent hamstring injuries in elite athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(9): 1500–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koulouris G, Connell D. Hamstring muscle complex: an imaging review. Radiographics 2005; 25(3): 571–586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.253045711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT, Spriggins AJ. Clinical risk factors for hamstring muscle strain injury: a prospective study with correlation of injury by magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Sports Med 2001; 35(6): 435–439. discussion 440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Connell DA, Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, Malara F, Buchbinder R, Koulouris G, et al. Longitudinal study comparing sonographic and MRI assessments of acute and healing hamstring injuries. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183(4): 975–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibbs NJ, Cross TM, Cameron M, Houang MT. The accuracy of MRI in predicting recovery and recurrence of acute grade one hamstring muscle strains within the same season in Australian Rules football players. J Sci Med Sport 2004; 7(2): 248–258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Slavotinek JP, Verrall GM, Fon GT. Hamstring injury in athletes: using MR imaging measurements to compare extent of muscle injury with amount of time lost from competition. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179(6): 1621–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Fon GT, Esterman A. Assessment of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings of hamstring injury as predictors for recurrent injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006; 36(4): 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garrett WE Jr., Rich FR, Nikolaou PK, Vogler JB 3rd. Computed tomography of hamstring muscle strains. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21(5): 506–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Best TM, Shehadeh SE, Leverson G, Michel JT, Corr DT, Aeschlimann D. Analysis of changes in mRNA levels of myoblast- and fibroblast-derived gene products in healing skeletal muscle using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. J Orthop Res 2001; 19(4): 565–572.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaariainen M, Jarvinen T, Jarvinen M, Rantanen J, Kalimo H. Relation between myofibers and connective tissue during muscle injury repair. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000; 10(6): 332–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. De Smet AA, Best TM. MR imaging of the distribution and location of acute hamstring injuries in athletes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174(2): 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of the proximal rectus femoris musculotendinous unit. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13(4): 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tuite MJ, DeSmet AA. MRI of selected sports injuries: muscle tears, groin pain, and osteochondritis dissecans. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT & MR. 1994; 15(5): 318–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reeder SB, Pineda AR, Wen Z, Shimakawa A, Yu H, Brittain JH, et al. Iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54(3): 636–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Drape JL, Silbermann-Hoffman O, Houvet P, Dubert T, Thivet A, Benmelha Z, et al. Complications of flexor tendon repair in the hand: MR imaging assessment. Radiology 1996; 198(1): 219–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. May DA, Disler DG, Jones EA, Balkissoon AA, Manaster BJ. Abnormal signal intensity in skeletal muscle at MR imaging: patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics 2000; 20(Spec No): S295–S315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Speer KP, Lohnes J, Garrett WE Jr. Radiographic imaging of muscle strain injury. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21(1): 89–95. discussion 96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Butler DL, Juncosa N, Dressler MR. Functional efficacy of tendon repair processes. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2004; 6: 303–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nikolaou PK, Macdonald BL, Glisson RR, Seaber AV, Garrett WE Jr. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of muscle after controlled strain injury. Am J Sports Med 1987; 15(1): 9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schneider-Kolsky ME, Hoving JL, Warren P, Connell DA. A comparison between clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging of acute hamstring injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(6): 1008–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Holzbaur KR, Murray WM, Gold GE, Delp SL. Upper limb muscle volumes in adult subjects. J Biomech 2007; 40(4): 742–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Lehtinen JT, Capell B, Palmer WE, Warner JJ. Magnetic resonance imaging in quantitative analysis of rotator cuff muscle volume. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 415: 104–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gold GE, Hargreaves BA, Vasanawala SS, Webb JD, Shimakawa AS, Brittain JH, et al. Articular cartilage of the knee: evaluation with fluctuating equilibrium MR imaging—initial experience in healthy volunteers. Radiology 2006; 238(2): 712–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment of funding sources

National Football League Medical Charities, National Institutes of Health Grant Number R01 AR56201, National Science Foundation predoctoral fellowship (A.S.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Tuite.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silder, A., Heiderscheit, B.C., Thelen, D.G. et al. MR observations of long-term musculotendon remodeling following a hamstring strain injury. Skeletal Radiol 37, 1101–1109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0546-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-008-0546-0

Keywords

Navigation