Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) function postulates that SIJ shear is prevented by friction, dynamically influenced by muscle force and ligament tension. Thus, SIJ stability can be accommodated to specific loading situations. The purpose of this study was to examine, in vivo, whether muscles contribute to force closure of the SIJ. SIJ stiffness was measured using a verified method combining color Doppler imaging with induced oscillation of the ilium relative to the sacrum in six healthy women. SIJ stiffness was measured both in a relaxed situation and during isometric voluntary contractions (electromyographically recorded). The biceps femoris, gluteus maximus, erector spinae, and contralateral latissimus dorsi were included in this study. Results were statistically analyzed. The study showed that SIJ stiffness significantly increased when the individual muscles were activated. This held especially true for activation of the erector spinae, the biceps femoris and the gluteus maximus muscles. During some tests significant co-contraction of other muscles occurred. The finding that SIJ stiffness increased even with slight muscle activity supports the notion that effectiveness of load transfer from spine to legs is improved when muscle forces actively compress the SIJ, preventing shear. When joints are manually tested, the influence of muscle activation patterns must be considered, since both inter- and intra-tester reliability of the test can be affected by muscle activity. In this respect, the relation between emotional states, muscle activity and joint stiffness deserves further exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buyruk HM (1996) Color Doppler Imaging: new applications in musculoskeletal system pathology. Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buyruk HM, Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Laméris JS, Holland WPJ, Stam HJ (1995) The measurements of sacroiliac joint stiffness with color Doppler imaging: a study on healthy subjects. Eur J Radiol 21:117–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buyruk HM, Stam HJ, Snijders CJ, Laméris JS, Holland WPJ, Stijnen TH (1999) Measurement of sacroiliac stiffness in peripartum pelvic patients with Doppler imaging of vibrations (DIV). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 83:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delagi EF, Perotto A, Lazetti J, Morrison D (1981) Anatomic guide for the electromyographer. Charles C. Thomas, Illinois

  5. Hides J (1998) The lumbar multifidus: evidence of a link to low back pain. Proceedings of the Third Interdisciplinary World Congress On Low Back And Pelvic Pain, Vienna, pp 117–122

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hodges PW (1999) Is there a role for transversus abdominis in lumbo-pelvic stability? Man Ther 4:74–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodges PW, Richardson CA (1996) Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain. A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominis. Spine 21:2640–2650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holstege G, Bandler R, Saper CB (eds)(1996) The emotional motor system. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

  9. Kendall HO, Kendall FP, Wadsworth GE (1971) Muscles, testing and function. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

  10. Kissling RO (1995) The mobility of the sacro-iliac joint in healthy subjects. Proceedings of the Second Interdisciplinary World Congress On Low Back Pain. San Diego, pp 411–422

  11. Kumar S, Narayan Y, Zedka M (1996) An electromyographic study of unresisted trunk rotation with normal velocity among healthy subjects. Spine 21:1500–1512

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller JA, Schulz AB, Andersson GB (1987) Load displacement behavior of sacroiliac joints. J Orthop Res 5:92–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mooney V, Pozos R, Vleeming A, Gulick J, Swenski D (2001) Exercise treatment for sacroiliac pain. Orthopedics 24:29–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Potter NA, Rothstein JM (1989) Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Phys Ther 65:1671–1675

    Google Scholar 

  15. Smidt GL, Wei S-H, McQuade K, Barakatt E, Tiansheng S, Stanford W (1997) Sacroiliac motion for extreme hip positions. Spine 22:2073–2082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R (1993) Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs. 1, 2. Clin Biomech 8:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  17. Snijders CJ, Slagter AHE, Strik R van, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Stam HJ (1995) Why leg-crossing? The influence of common postures on abdominal muscle activity. Spine 20:1989–1993

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sturesson B, Selvik GA, Udén U (1989) Movements of the sacroiliac joints. Spine 14:162–165

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sturesson B, Udén U, Vleeming A (2000) A radiostereometric analysis of movement of the sacroiliac joints during the standing hip flexion test. Spine 25:364–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vleeming A (1990) The sacroiliac joint, a clinical-anatomical, biomechanical and radiological study. Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam

  21. Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Snijders CJ (1989) The sacrotuberous ligament: a conceptual approach to its dynamic role in stabilizing the sacroiliac joint. Clin Biomech 4:201–203

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vleeming A, Wingerden JP van, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R, Stijnen T (1989) Load application to the sacrotuberous ligament; influences on sacroiliac joint mechanics. Clin Biomech 4:204–209

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Volkers ACW, Snijders CJ (1990) Relation between form and function in the sacro-iliac joint. 1. Clinical anatomical aspects. Spine 15:130–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vleeming A, Volkers ACW, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R (1990) Relation between form and function in the sacro-iliac joint. 2. Biomechanical aspects. Spine 15:133–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vleeming A, Wingerden JP van, Dijkstra PF, Stoeckart R, Snijders CJ, Stijnen T(1992) Mobility in the sacroiliac joints in the elderly: a kinematic and radiological study. Clin Biomech 7:170–176

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vleeming A, Buyruk HM, Stoeckart R, Karamürsel S, Snijders CJ (1992) An integrated therapy for peripartum pelvic instability. A study of the biomechanical effects of pelvic belts. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 166:1243–1247

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Vleeming A, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Stoeckart R, Wingerden JP van, Snijders CJ (1995) The posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia; its function in load transfer from spine to legs. Spine 20:753–758

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vleeming A, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Hammudoghlu D, Stoeckart R, Snijders CJ, Mens JMA (1996) The function of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament; its implication for understanding low back pain. Spine 21:556–562

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R, Mens JMA (1997) The role of the sacroiliac joints in coupling between spine, pelvis, legs, and arms. In: Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R (eds) Movement, stability & low back pain. Churchill Livingstone, pp 53–71

  30. Wingerden JP van, Vleeming A, Snijders CJ, Stoeckart R (1993) A functional-anatomical approach to the spine-pelvis mechanism: interaction between the biceps femoris muscle and the sacrotuberous ligament. Eur Spine J 2:140–144

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wingerden JP van, Vleeming A, Stam HJ, Stoeckart R (1995) Interaction of spine and legs: influence of hamstring tension on lumbo-pelvic rhythm. Proceedings of the Second Interdisciplinary World Congress On Low Back Pain, San Diego, pp 109–122

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to acknowledge the department of Biomedical Physics and Technology of the Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands, for their technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine & Joint Centre, Westerlaan 10, 3016 CK, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    J. P. van Wingerden & A. Vleeming

  2. Institute of Rehabilitation, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    H. M. Buyruk

  3. Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, The Netherlands

    K. Raissadat

Authors
  1. J. P. van Wingerden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Vleeming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. M. Buyruk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Raissadat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. van Wingerden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Wingerden, J.P., Vleeming, A., Buyruk, H.M. et al. Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis. Eur Spine J 13, 199–205 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0575-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0575-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation