Original research articleBone mineral density in women aged 40–49 years using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enanthate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception
Introduction
Cross-sectional studies undertaken to investigate the effect of hormonal contraceptives on bone mineral density (BMD) have produced conflicting reports [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Most have indicated that depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has a negative effect on bone mass [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and some have shown minimal or no effect [6], [7], [8]. The loss of BMD in the case of DMPA has been associated with estrogen deficiency [9]. Some of these studies show that these negative changes are reversible and there is a return to pre-use levels on discontinuation of the method [1], [10]. In addition, there has been evidence of recovery of BMD in long-term users [1], [6], [11]. There is no information available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on bone mass; however, published studies on norethisterone (NET) have shown a positive effect on BMD [12], [13], [14]. Combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have not been found to be associated with loss of bone mass [15], [16], with some studies indicating that COCs are bone-sparing [16], [17].
Few studies have investigated the effect of hormonal contraceptives on BMD in premenopausal long-term users of hormonal methods in their 40s, and none have investigated the effect of NET-EN on BMD.
Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone enanthate are effective contraceptives with low failure rates [18]. In South Africa, hormonal injectable contraceptive use is high, with about 60% of Black African women practicing contraception using either DMPA or NET-EN [19]. Of the two available injections, older women mainly use DMPA and often continue to use this method into their late 40s. Use of COCs is lower with the method predominantly used by white and Asian women. As menopause is known to be associated with bone loss [20], it would be important to know if hormonal methods of contraception could further contribute to bone loss in older women.
The aim of this study was to determine if long-term use of hormonal contraceptives (COCs, DMPA and NET-EN) is associated with change in bone mass in women aged 40–49 years.
Section snippets
Subjects and methods
A cohort of women 40–49 years old using DMPA, NET-EN or COCs and nonusers of hormonal contraception were recruited from a large family planning clinic in Durban, South Africa. Recruitment commenced in 2000 and was completed in 2003. For inclusion as a hormonal contraceptive user, women had to have used DMPA, NET-EN or COCs for at least 1 year. For inclusion in the nonuser control group, women should not have used any form of hormonal contraception in the past year. All DMPA users were on a
Results
In total, 496 women were recruited. Baseline information about these women is summarized in Table 1. Although the groups using hormonal contraception were similar in age, the nonusers of hormonal contraception were on average 2 years older than DMPA users (p<.001). Norethisterone enanthate users were the youngest group with a mean age of 43 years. Almost all women were African except for the COC group which included around a quarter (26%) of Indian women. This resulted in a significant
Discussion
The findings of this cross-sectional study of older women (40–49 years) show no evidence of a significant difference in BMD between the three contraceptive users and nonuser control groups. This is in agreement with some studies that have found no difference in BMD in long-term users of DMPA compared to nonuser controls [1], [6] and the normal population mean [8]. Some of these studies [1], [8] suggest that any bone loss would occur in approximately the first 3 years of use but that this effect
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the World Health Organization and the Department for International Development UK (DFID).
References (26)
- et al.
Bone mineral density in women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception
J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
(1999) - et al.
Bone mineral density at various anatomic bone sites in women receiving combined oral contraceptives and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception
Contraception
(2002) - et al.
Bone mineral density in long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate acceptors
Contraception
(1997) - et al.
Forearm bone density in users of Depo-Provera as a contraceptive method
Fertil. Steril.
(1999) - et al.
Further evaluation of long-term depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate use and bone mineral density; a longitudinal cohort study
Contraception
(2000) Bone-sparing properties of oral contraceptives
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1996)- et al.
Menopausal bone loss in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(2002) - et al.
Forearm bone density in long-term users of oral combined contraceptives and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
Fertil. Steril.
(2001) - et al.
Uncoupling of bone formation and resorption by combined oestrogen and progestagen therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis
Lancet
(1985) - et al.
Steroid hormone contraception and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study in an international population
J. Obstet. Gynaecol.
(2000)