Ski | EKIN (J/BW) | ANOVA | Pairwise comparisons (%) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKIREF | SKIWH | SKILH | SKIWL | SKIWLH | p Value | SKIWH−SKIREF | SKILH−SKIREF | SKIWL−SKIREF | SKIWLH−SKIREF | |
SectionSTEEP | ||||||||||
Skier A | 31.35±0.30 | 31.15±0.04 | 31.44±0.24 | 31.65±0.37 | 30.40±0.43 | .001*** | −3.0* | |||
Skier B | 31.08±0.18 | 31.15±0.04 | 31.05±0.25 | 31.2±0.42 | 30.08±0.55 | .005*** | −3.2* | |||
SectionFLAT | ||||||||||
Skier A | 45.24±0.47 | 45.47±0.61 | 45.67±1.01 | 46.32±0.08 | 45.10±0.64 | 0.209 | ||||
Skier B | 43.30±0.96 | 45.07±0.61 | 44.54±0.15 | 44.96±1.30 | 44.70±0.73 | 0.108 |
Level of significance: *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. Post hoc method with Tukey-Kramer correction for pairwise comparison.
The mean±SD of EKIN is given for each prototype and course section on the left side. The right side presents selected pairwise ANOVA comparisons of SKIWH, SKILH, SKIWL and SKIWLH with SKIREF. A difference is negative if the modified skis showed smaller EKIN mean values than when skiing on SKIREF.
ANOVA, analysis of variance; EKIN, kinetic energy; SectionFLAT, flat course section; SectionSTEEP, steep course section; SKIREF, reference ski.