Table 4

Mean test scores across the three subgroups generated by hierarchical cluster and latent profile analysis

SubgroupWEAK and TIGHTER
Mean (SD)
STRONG
Mean (SD)
WEAK and PRONATED FOOT
Mean (SD)
ANOVA
Hierarchical clusteringN=49N=29N=49
 Rectus Femoris Length0121.8 (19.48)140.7 (17.06)*130.4 (19.21)F=9.26, p<0.001
 Gastrocnemius Length022.3 (9.71)†28.0 (6.51)†33.1 (11.21)†F=14.98, p<0.001
 Quadriceps Strength
Nm/kg
0.84 (0.32)1.65 (0.53)*0.82 (0.32)F=53.01, p<0.001
 Abductor Strength
Nm/kg
0.79 (0.30)1.69 (0.46)*0.83 (0.29)F=75.11, p<0.001
 Total Patellar Mobility mm10.0 (3.55)10.8 (3.03)15.4 (4.61)*F=27.12, p<0.001
 Foot Posture index3.3 (4.16)3.0 (5.28)6.3 (3.49)*F=8.22, p<0.001
Latent profile analysisN=50N=28N=49
 Rectus Femoris Length0119.1 (18.06)*140.6 (16.91)133.5 (18.99)F=14.58, p<0.001
 Gastrocnemius Length028.7 (11.08)28.2 (6.29)26.6 (12.39)F=0.53, p=0.59
 Quadriceps Strength
Nm/kg
0.62 (0.24)†1.68 (0.52)†1.04 (0.23)†F=97.54, p<0.001
 Abductor Strength
Nm/kg
0.60 (0.18)†1.73 (0.42)†1.02 (0.21)†F=167.69, p<0.001
 Total Patellar Mobility mm12.5 (3.7710.5 (3.15)12.8 (5.84)F=2.55, p=0.083
 Foot Posture index2.80 (4.35)3.71 (5.33)6.37 (3.11)*F=9.51, p<0.001
  • †All groups significantly different from each other (p<0.05).

  • *Group significantly different from each of the other two (p<0.05).

  • ANOVA, analysis of variance.