Comparison of subgroup membership between the two classification methods
| Subgroups generated by | Latent profile analysis | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hierarchical cluster analysis | ‘Weak and tight’ | ‘Strong’ | ‘Weak and pronated foot’ | ||
| ‘Weak and tighter’ | 25 | 1 | 23 | 49 | |
| ‘Strong’ | 1 | 26 | 2 | 29 | |
| ‘Weak and pronated foot’ | 24 | 1 | 24 | 49 | |
| Total | 50 | 28 | 49 | 127 | |