Primary review question/aim | |
What are the critical elements of sideline screening that can be used to establish the diagnosis of concussion or suspected concussion? | |
Inclusion criteria | |
Population | Athletes competing in sporting activity and sustaining a non-trivial head impact event (includes any nationality, gender, age group or level of performance). |
Intervention/index tests | Any sideline* screening assessment used to detect suspected concussion following sports-related significant head impact events (including historical features, symptoms, physical findings, clinical tests or technologies) |
Outcome/reference standard | Concussion, clinically diagnosed by a registered medical practitioner. |
Study design | Published or unpublished studies of any research design. |
Exclusion criteria | |
Population | Not related to sport, subjects <13 years, animal studies |
Intervention/index tests | Non-sideline testing |
Outcome/reference standard | Concussion not examined |
Study design | Case reports |
Review subtopics/objectives | |
Sideline screening tests | Characterise the diagnostic accuracy of sideline clinical tests to detect suspected SRC, including:
|
Technology | Determine the utility of technology in the detection of suspected SRC. |
Integrated head injury assessment protocols | Evaluate integrated protocols for the detection and management of SRC currently used in professional collision sports. |
*‘Sideline’ is used generally to denote testing away from the immediate sporting environment, for example, rink side, track side, locker room, medical room, touch line and so on.
SRC, sports-related concussion.