Table 2

GRADE evidence profile: customised foot orthoses compared with prefabricated foot orthoses

Quality assessmentLimitationsInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionPublication biasSummary of findingsEffect size
(95% CI)
GRADE
OutcomeNo of
trials
Participants
Foot orthosesSham
Pain
  Short term227 38 Very serious limitations*No serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious imprecision Undetected9793SMD −0.04
(−0.33 to 0.24)
Very low
  Medium term426 27 38 44 Serious limitations No serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious imprecision Undetected214199SMD −0.07
(−0.26 to 0.12)
Low
  Longer term126 No serious limitationsSerious inconsistency § No serious indirectnessVery serious imprecision Undetected4644SMD 0.04
(−0.38 to 0.45)
Very low
Function
  Short termNil
  Medium term226 27 Serious limitations No serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious imprecision Undetected6259SMD −0.06
(−0.39 to 0.27)
Low
  Longer termNil
  • *All participants from trials at high risk of bias.

  • †CIs are narrow; however, the upper and lower boundaries represent different conclusions regarding the true effect.

  • ‡>25% of participants from trials at high risk of bias.

  • §Point estimates vary with high I2.

  • ¶Recommendation from one trial and CIs represent different conclusions regarding the true effect.

  • GRADE, Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; SMD, standardised mean difference.