Table 2

Showing the prevalence of use of individual instruments (shown as the number of previous studies and %) and responses to Delphi survey 1 (shown as the number of responses and %)

Domain: measurePrevalenceClinicians and researchersPatients (n=7)
*nabcabc
Patient rating of condition
Global Perceived Effect Score1 (<1)3922 (56)28 (72)36 (92)5 (71)6 (86)6 (86)
GROC9 (4)3925 (64)29 (74)34 (87)4 (57)6 (86)6 (86)
Patient Satisfaction Scale29 (11)3920 (51)25 (64)35 (90)5 (71)6 (86)6 (86)
Roles and Maudsley†15 (6)
Participation (daily activities, work and sport)
Return to sport5 (2)3915 (38)25 (64)32 (82)5 (71)5 (71)6 (86)
Time off work16 (6)3921 (54)31 (79)30 (77)4 (57)4 (57)6 (86)
Total Elbow Scoring System1 (<1)3912 (31)14 (36)21 (54)4 (57)4 (57)5 (71)
OSTRC question 1†0
Pain on activity/loading
Tennis Elbow Functional Scale2 (1)3911 (28)24 (62)22 (56)6 (86)6 (86)6 (86)
Thomsen Test (VAS pain resisted wrist extension)7 (3)3914 (36)28 (72)28 (72)5 (71)5 (71)6 (86)
VAS chair pick-up2 (1)399 (23)20 (51)23 (59)2 (29)6 (86)4 (57)
VAS pain during activity49 (19)3931 (79)35 (90)34 (87)4 (57)5 (71)6 (86)
VAS pain during elbow movement5 (2)397 (18)13 (33)27 (69)2 (29)3 (43)6 (86)
VAS pain on gripping16 (6)3928 (72)37 (95)35 (90)5 (71)5 (71)7 (100)
VAS pain at work11 (4)3915 (38)23 (59)29 (74)3 (43)3 (43)4 (57)
Pain Free Functional Index2 (1)397 (18)20 (51)23 (59)3 (43)3 (43)6 (86)
PRTEE†‡78 (30)3824 (63)30 (79)27 (71)7 (100)7 (100)7 (100)
Function
Patient Specific Functional Scale1 (<1)3811 (29)24 (63)20 (53)5 (71)6 (86)6 (86)
Upper Extremity Functional Scale5 (2)3817 (45)26 (68)26 (68)4 (57)4 (57)7 (100)
VAS function6 (2)3817 (45)24 (63)29 (76)2 (29)3 (43)4 (57)
PRTEE†‡78 (30)
Psychological factors
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale3 (1)3814 (37)20 (53)19 (50)2 (29)2 (29)6 (86)
Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia4 (2)3815 (39)19 (50)21 (55)5 (71)6 (86)5 (71)
STAI trait†0
Nottingham Health Profile†3 (1)
Physical function capacity (eg, strength)
Grip strength (maximum)93 (36)3818 (47)31 (82)26 (68)6 (86)6 (86)7 (100)
Pain-free grip strength42 (16)3825 (66)30 (79)27 (71)6 (86)6 (86)7 (100)
Elbow ROM6 (2)384 (11)12 (32)25 (66)3 (43)2 (29)7 (100)
Disability
Andrews-Carson2 (1)380 (0)3 (8)10 (26)1 (14)1 (14)3 (43)
ASES score5 (2)384 (11)17 (45)13 (34)3 (43)3 (43)5 (71)
Broberg and Morrey Rating System1 (<1)381 (3)8 (21)10 (26)2 (29)3 (43)5 (71)
DASH77 (30)3815 (39)26 (68)17 (45)4 (57)4 (57)5 (71)
HAND101 (<1)383 (8)17 (45)23 (61)4 (57)4 (57)6 (86)
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Elbow Score2 (1)384 (11)17 (45)16 (42)0 (0)0 (0)4 (57)
Laitinen Questionnaire1 (<1)385 (13)14 (37)15 (39)1 (14)1 (14)4 (57)
Liverpool Elbow Score1 (<1)381 (3)13 (34)13 (34)2 (29)3 (43)3 (43)
Mayo Elbow Performance Score30 (12)383 (8)12 (32)15 (39)0 (0)0 (0)2 (29)
Nirschl18 (7)387 (18)22 (58)21 (55)4 (57)4 (57)4 (57)
Nottingham Health Profile3 (1)381 (3)6 (16)12 (32)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Oxford Elbow Score4 (2)389 (24)20 (53)21 (55)4 (57)5 (71)6 (86)
Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire1 (<1)385 (13)17 (45)19 (50)4 (57)4 (57)6 (86)
PRTEE†‡78 (30)3727 (73)34 (92)32 (86)6 (86)6 (86)6 (86)
Quick DASH37 (14)3827 (71)29 (76)31 (82)7 (100)7 (100)7 (100)
Total Elbow Scoring System1 (<1)384 (11)14 (37)20 (53)2 (29)2 (29)4 (57)
Roles and Maudsley15 (6)382 (5)11 (29)22 (58)1 (14)2 (29)4 (57)
Quality of life
EQ5D9 (4)3719 (51)22 (59)25 (68)4 (57)4 (57)6 (86)
SF-3613 (5)376 (16)23 (62)9 (24)1 (14)5 (71)2 (29)
SF-124 (2)3715 (41)25 (68)25 (68)3 (43)5 (71)4 (57)
Nottingham Health Profile†3 (1)
WHOQol BREF†0
SMFA†0
Pain over a specified timeframe
VAS night pain9 (4)3714 (38)26 (70)32 (86)2 (29)4 (57)6 (86)
VAS pain defined time period22 (9)3725 (68)30 (81)29 (78)2 (29)3 (43)5 (71)
VAS pain at rest52 (20)3721 (57)25 (68)31 (84)1 (14)2 (29)5 (71)
Tennis Elbow Functional Scale2 (1)378 (22)22 (59)21 (57)6 (86)6 (86)6 (86)
Measures from review not mapped
Analgesic use2 (1)3716 (43)1 (14)
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure1 (<1)372 (5)1 (14)
Cold Pain Threshold5 (2)373 (8)1 (14)
EMG5 (2)370 (0)2 (29)
Gothenburg QoL Instrument1 (<1)370 (0)0 (0)
MRI appearance5 (2)373 (8)1 (14)
ORI-TETS3 (1)371 (3)1 (14)
Placzek Score1 (<1)374 (11)2 (29)
Pressure Pain Threshold24 (9)377 (19)1 (14)
US appearance13 (5)374 (11)1 (14)
UoP-PFQ2 (1)371 (3)1 (14)
VAS pain on palpation12 (5)374 (11)2 (29)
VAS pain overall101 (39)379 (24)2 (29)
WL-261 (<1)372 (5)4 (57)
  • a: this measure should be in the core outcome set for lateral elbow tendinopathy.

  • b: this measure has content and face validity.

  • c: the measure is clinically feasible.

  • Green (yes responses: ≥70%) and amber (unsure responses: 30%–69%) were progressed to subsequent stages of the Delphi, whereas red (<30%) were removed.

  • *2 participants partially completed the first survey and their data was included herein.

  • †Outcome measures suggested by participants, noting PRTEE was not new to the list.

  • ‡Removal of one participant’s response who was designer of the measure.

  • ASES, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; DASH, Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire; EMG, electromyography; GROC, Global Rating of Change; ORI-TETS, Orthopaedic Research Institute-Tennis Elbow Testing System; OSTRC, Oslo Sport Trauma Research Centre Questionnaire; PRTEE, Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation; QoL, quality of life; ROM, range of movement; SF-12, 12-item Short Form Health Survey; SF-36, 36-item Short Form Health Survey; SMFA, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment; STAI, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; UoP-PFQ, University of Peloponnese Pain, Functionality and Quality of Life Questionnaire; US, ultrasound; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; WHOQol BREF, WHO Quality of Life Abbreviated Questionnaire; WL-26, Work Limitation 26-item Questionnaire.