Table 5

Rearfoot eversion velocity comparisons for studies where point estimates of effect and confidence intervals were able to be calculated

AuthorsInterventionComparatorMean difference (95% CI)Effect size (ES)
Branthwaite et al32BiplanarControl−4 (−20.37 to 12.37)0.23
CobraControl5 (−7.55 to 17.55)0.35
BiplanarCobra−9 (−26.4 to 8.4)0.48
MacLean et al36Posted moulded (Inverted)ControlInitial: 38.66 (−22.44 to 99.76)0.51
After 6 weeks of wear: 37.58 (−43.9 to 119.06)0.37
McCulloch et al5Posted mouldedControlRate of pronation first 10% stance0.22,
walking 3.2 km/h: 4.5 (−13.68 to 22.68),0.06
walking 4.8 km/h: 1.5 (−21.17 to 24.17)0.31,
Rate of pronation second 10% stance walking 3.2 km/h: −6.2 (−23.94 to 11.54), walking 4.8 km/h: 1.1 (−17.22 to 19.42)0.05
Mündermann et al30Posted non-mouldedControl−71.8 (−159.78 to 16.18)0.49
non-moulded postedControl12.1 (−78.74 to 102.94)0.08
Posted mouldedControl19.7 (−70.01 to 109.41)0.13
Posted non-mouldedNon-posted moulded−83.9 (−168.63 to 0.83)0.6
Posted non-mouldedPosted moulded−91.5 (−175.02 to −7.98)0.66
Non-posted mouldedPosted moulded−7.6 (−94.13 to 78.93)0.05
Stackhouse et al39Posted mouldedControl−7.85 (not significant)
Stacoff et al11Posted non-moulded (anterior)Control5.0 (−35.61 to 45.61)0.15
Posted non-moulded (posterior)Control−2.42 (−42.12 to 37.28)0.08
Posted non-moulded (posterior)Posted non-moulded (Anterior)−7.42 (−45.51 to 30.67)0.24
Zifchock and Davis 200825Posted moulded (semicustom)ControlLow arch: −10.87 (−41.37 to 19.63)0.23
Posted moulded (custom)ControlHigh arch: −14.32 (−50.92 to 22.28)0.25
Posted moulded (custom)Posted moulded (semicustom)Low arch: −14.14 (−44.87 to 16.58)0.3
Posted moulded (custom)Posted moulded (semicustom)High arch: −20.51 (−56.08 to 15.06),0.37,
−3.27 (−33.87 to 27.32),0.07,
−6.19 (−34.14 to 21.76)0.14