TableĀ 3

Matrix for ADOPTION of the Mayday Safety Procedure (MSP) programme by community rugby union coaches Programme use outcome: coach decides to deliver MSP training to players

Determinants of coach adoption behaviour
Internal (personal)External
Performance objectivesKnowledgeSkillsBeliefsEnvironment
PO1: Coach becomes aware of need to train players in MSPK1: Knows why players should be competent in MSPB1: Believes players should be competent in MSP
B2: Believes players need to be trained in MSP
E1: Clubs, RRUA and ARU promote the need for player competency in MSP
PO2: Coach becomes aware of available training on how to deliver MSP training to playersK2: Knows when and where MSP training for coaches is to be heldE2: Clubs, RRUA association and ARU promote MSP training for coaches
PO3: Coach decides to attend training on how to deliver MSP training to playersB3: Believes that attending MSP training for coaches will lead to the necessary knowledge and skill to train players in MSP
B4: Believes that attending MSP training for coaches is beneficial
B5: Believes that other coaches, administrators etc approve of coaches attending MSP training
E3: Clubs, RRUA association and ARU praise coaches for deciding to attend MSP training
E4: Clubs, RRUA association and ARU promote policy requiring coaches to be accredited including ensuring players are competent in MSP
PO4: Coach attends training on how to deliver MSPK3: Knows location and time of chosen MSP training sessionB6: Believes attending training meets ARU accreditation requirements
B7: Believes they can complete MSP training
B8: Believes that other coaches will attend MSP training
E5: Clubs, RRUA association and ARU praise coaches for attending MSP training
E6: ARU provide MSP training at a location, time and cost convenient to coaches
  • ARU, Australian Rugby Union represented by regional development staff; RRUA, Regional Rugby Union Association.