Abstract
The principle aims of this research were, firstly, to determine if the relationship between integrated electromyography (iEMG) and exercise intensity was linear or threshold-like, and secondly, to determine if the relationship between iEMG and exercise intensity was repeatable on different test occasions. A group of 20 trained male subjects participated in the study. Each subject completed two incremental exercise tests on a Monark cycle ergometer. The tests were identical and separated from each other by a mean period of 42 (SD 12) h. The EMG signals were recorded from the vastus lateralis, rectus femoris and vastus medialis muscles at each intensity using surface electrodes. The relationship between iEMG and intensity was shown to be linear (r = 0.95 to r = 0.98) with no obvious iEMG thresholds present. The gradients of simple regression lines fitted to the iEMG compared to intensity were not significantly different on the retest occasion (CV 9%–12%). In summary, the findings of this study indicated that, during incremental exercise, the relationship between iEMG of the quadriceps musculature and exercise intensity was linear and not threshold-like. Furthermore, the linear relationship between iEMG and workload was repeatable on different test occasions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basmajian JV, De Luca CJ (1985) Muscles alive: their function revealed by electromyography, 5th edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore
Bigland-Richie B, Woods JJ (1974) Integrated EMG and oxygen uptake during dynamic contractions of human muscles. J Appl Physiol 36:475–479
Gollhofer A, Horstmann GA, Schmidtbleicher D, Schönthal D (1990) Reproducability of electromyographic patterns in stretch-shortening type contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol 60: 7–14
Gosling J (1988) Introduction to inferential statistics, chapter 7B. University of Western Sydney (Nepean), Australia
Hermens HJ, Boon KL, Zilvold G (1984) The clinical use of surface electromyography, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 24:243–265
Kramer H, Kuchler G, Braver D (1972) Investigations of the potential distribution of activated skeletal muscles in man by means of surface electrodes. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 12;19–26
LSAS (1993) Australian Sports Commission, National Sports Research Centre, Belconnen, ACT. 5–7
Moritani T, de Vries HA (1980) Anaerobic threshold determination by surface electromyography. Med Sci Sports 12:86
Nagata A, Muro M, Moritani T; Yoshida T (1981) Anaerobic threshold determination by blood lactate and myoelectric signals. Jpn J Physiol 31:585–597
Petrofsky JS (1979) Frequency and amplitude analysis of the EMG during exercise on a cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 41:1–15
Sale DG (1991) Testing strength and power. In: Mc Dougal JD, Wenger HA Gren HW (eds) Physiology testing of the high performance athlete, 2nd edn. Human Kinetics, Champaign, III., pp 21–106
Sihvonen T, Airakisinen O, Hanninen O (1988) Electrical behaviour (rms-EMG) of frontalis muscle during incremental exercise. Acta Physiol Scand [Supp. 575] 134:140
Soderberg GL, Cook TM (1984) Electromyography in biomechanics. Phy Ther 64:1813–1820
Takaishi T, Ono T, Yasuda Y (1992) Relationship between muscle fatigue and oxygen uptake during cycle ergometer exercise with different ramp slope increments. Eur J Appl Physiol 65:335–339
Taylor AD, Bronks R (1994) Electromyographic correlates of the transition from aerobic to anaerobic metabolism in treadmill running. Eur J Appl Physiol 69: 508–515
Vitasalo IT, Luhtanen P, Rahkila P, Rusko H (1985) Electromyographic activity related to aerobic and anaerobic threshold in ergometer bicycling. Acta Physiol Scan 124:287–293
Walsh ML, Bannister EW (1988) Possible mechanisms of the anaerobic threshold: a review. Sports Med 5:269–302
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor, A.D., Bronks, R. Reproducibility and validity of the quadriceps muscle integrated electromyogram threshold during incremental cycle ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol 70, 252–257 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238572
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238572