Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft in rugby players

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with doubled hamstring tendon graft in a selected group of 18 rugby players. The graft was fixed with a transcondylar screw (Transfix) on the femur, and with an absorbable interference screw and a metallic staple on the tibia. All the patients followed the same rehabilitation program. Return to sports activities was allowed after 6 months. Follow-up was 2 years in all cases. The athletic level of the patients was rated according to the Tegner scoring system. Clinical results were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring system. Furthermore, an instrumented evaluation of the anterior laxity with a KT–1000 arthrometer, and an isokinetic evaluation were performed 6 and 24 months after surgery. The Tegner mean score at follow-up (8.2) was similar to that prior to injury (8.3). IKDC overall results were normal in ten cases (55.6%), nearly normal in six cases (33.3%), and abnormal in two cases (11.1%). Side-to-side difference of anterior laxity measured with KT–1000 at 6 and 24 months did not show an impairment of knee stability with time. Isokinetic evaluation showed a significant improvement on peak torque both in extension and flexion on comparison between 6- and 24-month measurements. The results reported in this study showed that the use of doubled hamstring tendon graft for ACL reconstruction in athletes that were at risk for high-energy traumas to the knees, such as rugby players, gave normal or nearly normal results in about 90% of the cases. Recovery of muscle strength was almost complete 2 years after surgery, and there was no impairment of knee stability with time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamner DL, Brown CH, Steiner ME et al (1999) Hamstring tendon graft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: biomechanical evaluation of the use of multiple strands and tensioning techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:549–557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. To JT, Howell SM, Hull ML (1999) Contributions of femoral fixation methods to the stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament replacements at implantation. Arthroscopy 15:379–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ (1991) Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-complex: the effect of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med 19:217–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper DE, Deng XH, Burstein AL et al (1994) The strength of the central third patellar tendon graft: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 21:818–823

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Brown CH et al (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 22:240–246

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiler A, Windhagen HJ, Raschke MJ et al (1998) Biodegradable interference screw fixation exhibits pull-out force and stiffness similar to titanium screws. Am J Sports Med 26:119–128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schiavone Panni A, Milano G, Lucania L et al (1997) Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament recontruction in rabbits. Clin Orthop 343:203–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshiya S, Nagano M, Kurosaka M et al (2000) Graft healing in the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop 376:278–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA et al (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 29:722–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P et al (2001) A comparison of quadruple semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:348–354

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P et al (2001) There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized study of 107 patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:170–177

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Chang SK et al (2002) A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiger P, Brandsson S, Kartus J et al (1999) A comparison of results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female and male competitive athletes: a two- to five-year follow-up of 429 patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports 9:290–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howell SM, Taylor MA (1996) Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:616–625

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gibbs N (1993) Injuries in professional rugby league: a three-years prospectively study of the South Sidney Professional Rugby League Football Club. Am J Sports Med 21:696–700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Seward H, Orchard J, Hazard H et al (1993) Football injuries in Australia at the elite level. Med J Aust 159:298–301

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Webb J (1998) Rugby football and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Br J Sports Med 32:2–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aglietti P, Buzzi M, Zaccherotti G et al (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 22:211–218

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ et al (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 27:444–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marder RA, Raskind JR, Carrol M (1991) Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon. Am J Sports Med 19:478–484

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Neill DB (1996) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a prospective randomized analysis of three techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:803–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deehan DJ, Salmon LJ, Webb VJ et al (2000) Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with an ipsilateral patellar tendon autograft: a prospective longitudinal five-year study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:984–991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aglietti P, Buzzi M, Menchetti PP et al (1996) Arthroscopically assisted semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft in recontruction for acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 24:726–731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. LaPrade RF, Resig S, Wentorf FA et al (1999) The effects of grade III postero-lateral knee complex injuries on anterior cruciate ligament graft force: a biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 27:469–475

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wentorf FA, LaPrade RF, Lewis JL, Resig S (2002) The influence of the integrity of posterolateral structures on tibiofemoral orientation when an anterior cruciate ligament graft is tensioned. Am J Sports Med 30:796–799

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Howell SM, Taylor MA (1993) Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:1044–1055

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M et al (2001) Clinical and radiographic results of ACL reconstruction: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study of outside-in versus inside-out reconstruction techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:77–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro 43, 07100, Sassari (SS), Italy

    Carlo Fabbriciani, Giuseppe Milano, Pier Damiano Mulas & Fabio Ziranu

  2. Studio Alfa, Rome, Italy

    Gabriele Severini

Authors
  1. Carlo Fabbriciani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giuseppe Milano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pier Damiano Mulas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabio Ziranu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gabriele Severini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Fabbriciani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fabbriciani, C., Milano, G., Mulas, P.D. et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft in rugby players. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13, 2–7 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0505-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-004-0505-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation