Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common, especially among young athletes, and such injuries may have considerable impact on both sport careers and everyday life. ACL reconstructions are successful for most patients, but some suffer from persistent giving-way symptoms and/or re-ruptures requiring revision surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results after revision ACL reconstructions and compare them with the results in a control group consisting of primary ACL reconstructions.

Methods

This retrospective study included 56 patients undergoing revision ACL reconstruction and 52 patients receiving primary ACL reconstructions. The follow-up evaluation included clinical examination, instrumented laxity testing, testing of muscle strength, Tegner activity score, Lysholm score, Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and radiological grading of osteoarthritis.

Results

The median time from the last ACL reconstruction to follow-up was 90 months in the revision ACL reconstruction group and 96 months in the primary ACL reconstruction group. The revision group had significantly inferior KOOS and Lysholm scores compared with the primary group. Patients in the revision group also showed greater laxity measured with the pivot shift test, a larger reduction in the Tegner activity score, reduced muscle strength in the injured knee, and more severe radiological osteoarthritis; however, no difference in anterior-posterior translation was found.

Conclusion

Inferior results were found on several of the testing parameters in the revision group compared with the primary group. Patients should receive this information prior to revision ACL reconstructions.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Giron F, Simeone AJ, Zaccherotti G (1997) Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. A 5–8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5(3):138–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahlden M, Samuelsson K, Sernert N, Forssblad M, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2012) The Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients. Am J Sports Med 40(10):2230–2235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn JH, Lee YS, Chang MJ, Yim HS (2011) Analysis of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction according to the combined injury, degenerative change, and MRI findings. Knee 18(6):382–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold JA, Coker TP, Heaton LM, Park JP, Harris WD (1979) Natural history of anterior cruciate tears. Am J Sports Med 7(6):305–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aune AK, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 29(6):722–728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bach BR Jr (2003) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Arthroscopy 19(Suppl 1):14–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barenius B, Forssblad M, Engstrom B, Eriksson K (2012) Functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, a study of health-related quality of life based on the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-012-2162-8

  8. Battaglia MJ, Cordasco FA, Hannafin JA, Rodeo SA, O’Brien SJ, Altchek DW, Cavanaugh J, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2007) Results of revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 35(12):2057–2066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G, Stone ML, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(5):720–726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med 13(6):401–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Denti M, Lo Vetere D, Bait C, Schonhuber H, Melegati G, Volpi P (2008) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: causes of failure, surgical technique, and clinical results. Am J Sports Med 36(10):1896–1902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diamantopoulos AP, Lorbach O, Paessler HH (2008) Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: results in 107 patients. Am J Sports Med 36(5):851–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Drogset JO, Strand T, Uppheim G, Odegard B, Boe A, Grontvedt T (2010) Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1085–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eberhardt C, Kurth AH, Hailer N, Jager A (2000) Revision ACL reconstruction using autogenous patellar tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(5):290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Feagin JA Jr, Curl WW (1976) Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 4(3):95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fetto JF, Marshall JL (1980) The natural history and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147:29–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2006) Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34(12):2026–2037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grontvedt T, Engebretsen L, Bredland T (1996) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with and without augmentation. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(5):817–822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Harilainen A, Sandelin J (2001) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. A review of the literature and results of our own revisions. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11(3):163–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jarvela T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(5):500–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kamath GV, Redfern JC, Greis PE, Burks RT (2011) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 39(1):199–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kannus P, Jarvinen M (1987) Conservatively treated tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(7):1007–1012

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kartus J, Stener S, Lindahl S, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1998) Ipsi- or contralateral patellar tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery. A comparison of two methods. Am J Sports Med 26(4):499–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Keene GC, Bickerstaff D, Rae PJ, Paterson RS (1993) The natural history of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 21(5):672–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(1):34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liden M, Ejerhed L, Sernert N, Laxdal G, Kartus J (2007) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study with a 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35(5):740–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lind M, Lund B, Fauno P, Said S, Miller LL, Christiansen SE (2012) Medium to long-term follow-up after ACL revision. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(1):166–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2009) The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(2):117–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lind M, Menhert F, Pedersen AB (2012) Incidence and outcome after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: results from the danish registry for knee ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 40(7):1551–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsumoto A, Yoshiya S, Muratsu H, Yagi M, Iwasaki Y, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2006) A comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and bone-hamstring tendon-bone autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34(2):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mayr HO, Willkomm D, Stoehr A, Schettle M, Suedkamp NP, Bernstein A, Hube R (2012) Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon allograft and autograft: 2- and 5-year results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(6):867–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD005960

    Google Scholar 

  34. Musahl V, Kopf S, Rabuck S, Becker R, van der Merwe W, Zaffagnini S, Fu FH, Karlsson J (2012) Rotatory knee laxity tests and the pivot shift as tools for ACL treatment algorithm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):793–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Enomoto H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2010) Single-stage anterior cruciate ligament revision with bone-patellar tendon-bone: a case-control series of revision of failed synthetic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 26(8):1058–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1996) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Cincinnati. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:116–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Pallis M, Svoboda SJ, Cameron KL, Owens BD (2012) Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States military academy. Am J Sports Med 40(6):1242–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35(4):564–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roe J, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Kawamata T, Chew M (2005) A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities. Am J Sports Med 33(9):1337–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S (2003) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sajovic M, Strahovnik A, Dernovsek MZ, Skaza K (2011) Quality of life and clinical outcome comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an 11-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2161–2169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Salmon LJ, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Refshauge K (2006) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft—5- to 9-year follow-up. Am J Sport Med 34(10):1604–1614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sherman MF, Warren RF, Marshall JL, Savatsky GJ (1988) A clinical and radiographical analysis of 127 anterior cruciate insufficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227:229–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas NP, Kankate R, Wandless F, Pandit H (2005) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a 2-stage technique with bone grafting of the tibial tunnel. Am J Sports Med 33(11):1701–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Trojani C, Beaufils P, Burdin G, Bussiere C, Chassaing V, Djian P, Dubrana F, Ehkirch FP, Franceschi JP, Hulet C, Jouve F, Potel JF, Sbihi A, Neyret P, Colombet P (2012) Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1565–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Weiler A, Schmeling A, Stohr I, Kaab MJ, Wagner M (2007) Primary versus single-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective matched-group analysis. Am J Sports Med 35(10):1643–1652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wirth CJ, Kohn D (1996) Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Germany. Clin Orthop Relat Res 325:110–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Research Center, Trondheim University Hospital, 7006, Trondheim, Norway

    Tone Gifstad, Jon Olav Drogset & Grete Sofie Hortemo

  2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Tone Gifstad & Jon Olav Drogset

  3. Department of Radiology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway

    Annja Viset

  4. Rosenborg Clinic, Trondheim, Norway

    Torbjørn Grøntvedt

Authors
  1. Tone Gifstad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon Olav Drogset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Annja Viset
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Torbjørn Grøntvedt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Grete Sofie Hortemo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tone Gifstad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gifstad, T., Drogset, J.O., Viset, A. et al. Inferior results after revision ACL reconstructions: a comparison with primary ACL reconstructions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 2011–2018 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2336-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2336-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation