Skip to main content
Log in

Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been shown that inconsistently applied normalization for body size could be an important methodological problem in testing physical performance in areas such as sports, physical education, ergonomy, or physical medicine and rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate a part of the recently proposed classification of physical performance tests (Jaric 2003) based on the role of body size in the tested performance. Presuming a normalization method P n=P/S b based on an allometric relationship between the tested performance P and a selected index of body size S (P n performance normalized for body size; b allometric parameter), we specifically hypothesized that: (1) the tests of exertion of external force (e.g., lifting weight, pushing, pulling), (2) tests of rapid movements (jumping, sprinting, kicking) and (3) tests of supporting body weight (chin-ups, squats) would reveal the values of the allometric parameters b=0.67, b=0 and b=−0.33 when body size is expressed as body mass, or b=2, b=0 and b=−1 when body size is expressed as body height, respectively. Male physical education students (n=77) were tested on 18 standard physical performance tests belonging to the aforementioned three groups. The obtained values of the allometric parameters proved to be closely in line with the hypothesized ones. While the finding regarding the tests of exertion of external force (i.e., the tested force should be divided by m 0.67 in order to normalize the force for body size) have been already demonstrated by some authors, the findings related to the tests of rapid movements and, particularly, tests of supporting body weight are novel. Although the normalization methods discussed need further evaluation, a more accurate and consistently applied assessment of the body size-independent indices of the evaluated groups of standard tests could improve the methodology of physical performance testing in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aasa U, Jaric S, Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Johansson H (2003) Muscle strength assessment from functional performance tests: role of body size. J Strength Cond Res 17:644–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy PJ, Jürimäe J (1996) Cross-sectional and longitudinal uses of isoinertial, isometric, and isokinetic dynamomety. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:1180–1187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P (1995) Strength and power assessment. Issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med 19:401–417

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson E, Sward L, Thorstensson A (1988) Trunk muscle strength in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 20:587–593

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Astrand P-O, Rodahl K (1986) Textbook of work physiology, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

  • Baechle TR, Earle RW, Allerheiligen WB (1994) Strength training and spotting techniques. In: Baechle TR (ed) Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 345–400

  • Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedberg G, Janlert U, Jansson E (1996) Development of muscular endurance and strength from adolescence to adulthood and level of physical capacity in men and women at age of 34 years. Scand J Med Sci Sports 6:145–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batterham AM, George KP (1997) Allometric modelling does not determine a dimensionless power function ratio for maximal muscular function. J Appl Physiol 83:2158–2166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner T, Jackson A (1995) Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science. Brown and Benchmark, Madison

  • Benefice E (1992) Growth and motor-performance of healthy Senegalese preschool children. Am J Hum Biol 4:717–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Bompa T, Cornacchia L (1998) Serious strength training. Human Kinetics, Champaign

  • Brody S (1945) Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, New York

  • Challis JH (1999) Methodological report: the appropriate scaling of weightlifting performance. J Strength Cond Res 13:367–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies MJ, Dalsky GP (1997) Normalizing strength for body size differences in older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:713–717

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eurofit (1988) European tests of physical fitness. Council of Europe, Committee for the Development of Sport, Rome, Italy

  • Fleishman EA (1964) The structure and measurement of physical fitness. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NewYork

  • Hill AV (1950) The dimensions of animals and their muscular dynamics. Sci Prog 38:209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan J (1991) Structure of physical performance in occupational tasks. J Appl Psychol 76:495–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horita T, Kitamura K, Kohno N (1991) Body configuration and joint moment analysis during standing long jump in 6-year-old children and adult males. Med Sci Sports Exerc 23:1068–1072

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izquierdo M, Hakkinen K, Anton A, Garrues M, Ibanez J, Ruesta M, Gorostiaga EM (2001) Maximal strength and power, endurance performance, and serum hormones in middle-aged and elderly men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1577–1587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson AS, Pollock ML (1978) Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr 40:497–504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S (2002) Muscle strength testing: the use of normalization for body size. Sports Med 32:615–631

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S (2003) Role of body size in the relation between muscle strength and movement performance. Exercise Sport Sci Rev 31:8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S, Ugarkovic D, Kukolj M (2001) Anthropometric, strength, power and flexibility variables in elite male athletes: basketball, handball, soccer and volleyball players. J Hum Mov Stud 40:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S, Ugarkovic D, Kukolj M (2002a) Evaluation of methods for normalizing strength in elite and young athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 42:141–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaric S, Radosavljevic-Jaric S, Johansson H (2002b) Muscle force and muscle torque may require different methods when adjusting for body size. Eur J Appl Physiol 87:304–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Johansen L, Secher NH (2001) Influence of body mass on maximal oxygen uptake: effect of sample size. Eur J Appl Physiol 84:201–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber M (1932) Body size and metabolism. Hilgarida 6:315–353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komi PV, Bosco C (1978) Utilisation of stored elastic energy in leg extensor muscles by men and women. Med Sci Sports 10:261–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kulig K, Andrews JG, Hay JG (1984) Human strength curves. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 12:417–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh HW (1993) The multidimensional structure of physical fitness: invariance over gender and age. Res Q Exerc Sport 64:86–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Matavulj D, Kukolj M, Ugarkovic D, Tihanyi J, Jaric S (2001) Effects of plyometric training on jumping performance in junior basketball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 41:159–164

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N (1984) Reliability and validity of hand strength evaluation. J Hand Surg 9A: 222–226

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, WD, Katch FI, Katch VL (1999) Sports and exercise nutrition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

  • McBride JM, Triplett-McBride T, Davie A, Newton RU (2002) The effect of heavy versus light-load jump squats on the development of strength, power and speed. J Strength Cond Res 16:75–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon TA (1984) Muscles, reflexes and locomotion. Princeton, Princeton

  • Mirkov D, Nedeljkovic A, Milanovic S, Jaric S (2004) Muscle strength testing: evaluation of tests of explosive force production. Eur J Appl Physiol 91:147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ (1996) The assessment of human dynamic muscular function: a comparison of isoinertial and isokinetic tests. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 36:169–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ, Pryor JF (1994) The use of the isoinertial force mass relationship in the prediction of dynamic human performance. Eur J Appl Physiol 69:250–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Neder JA, Nery LE, Silva AC, Andreoni S, Whipp BJ (1999) Maximal aerobic power and leg muscle mass and strength related to age in non-athletic males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol 79:522–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nevill AM, Holder RL, Baxter-Jones A, Round JM, Jones DA (1998) Modeling developmental changes in strength and aerobic power in children. J Appl Physiol 84:963–970

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nevill AM, Stewart AD, Olds T, Holder R (2004) Are adult physiques geometrically similar? The dangers of allometric scaling using body mass power laws. Am J Phys Anthropol (in press)

  • Ostenberg A, Roos E, Ekdahl C, Roos H (1998) Isokinetic knee extensor strength and functional performance in healthy female soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:257–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt D (1999) Strength and physiological characteristics of NCAA division III American football players. J Strength Cond Res 13:210–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenick DM (1994) Testing protocols and procedures. In: Baechle TR (ed): Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 258–273

  • Simons J, Beunen G, Renson R, van Gerven D (1982) Construction of a motor ability test battery for boys and girls aged 12 to 19 years, using factor analysis. In: Simons J, Renson R (eds) Evaluation of motor fitness. Council of Europe, Committee for the Development of Sport. Leven, Belgium, pp 151–167

  • Siri WE (1956) The gross composition of the body. In: Lawrence J, Tobias C (eds) Advances in biological and medical physics. Academic, London, pp 239–280

  • Sleivert GG, Wenger HA (1994) Reliability of measuring isometric and isokinetic peak torque, rate of torque development, integrated electromyography, and tibial nerve conduction velocity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:1315–1321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sleivert GG, Backhus RD, Wenger HA (1995) Neuromuscular differences between volleyball players, middle distance runners and untrained controls. Int J Sports Med 16:390–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ugarkovic D, Matavulj D, Kukolj M, Jaric S (2002) Standard anthropometric, body composition, and strength variables as predictors of jumping performance in elite junior athletes. J Strength Cond Res 16:227–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vanderburgh PM, Katch FI, Choenleber J, Balabinis CP, Elliot R (1996) Multivariate allometric scaling of men’s world indoor rowing champion performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28:626–630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weibel ER (2002) The pitfalls of power laws. Nature 417:131–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner JS, Lourie JA (1969) Human biology: a guide to field methods. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1997) A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276:122–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore JH (1983) Body composition in sport and exercise: directions for future research. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15:21–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GJ, Murphy AJ (1996) The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment. Sports Med 22:19–37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson GJ, Newton RU, Murphy AJ, Humphries BJ (1993) Optimal training load for the development of dynamic athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:1279–1286

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young W (1995) Laboratory strength assessment of athletes. NSA 10: 89–96

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Metikos for valuable comments and suggestions. This study was supported in part by grants from the Croatian Ministery of Science and Technology Education (0034217) and from Serbian Research Council (1758).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Slobodan Jaric.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Markovic, G., Jaric, S. Movement performance and body size: the relationship for different groups of tests. Eur J Appl Physiol 92, 139–149 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1076-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1076-7

Keywords

Navigation