Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications
ReviewMethods for urinary testosterone analysis
References (85)
- et al.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1974) - et al.
Eur. J. Cancer
(1994) - et al.
J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol.
(1993) - et al.
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
(1985) - et al.
Metabolism
(1992) - et al.
Steroids
(1988) - et al.
Clin. Chim. Acta
(1978) J. Chromatogr.
(1986)- et al.
J. Chromatogr.
(1992) - et al.
J. Steroid Biochem.
(1982)
J. Steroid Biochem.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Biol. Chem.
J. Chromatogr.
Steroids
J. Steroid Biochem.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Steroid Biochem.
J. Steroid Biochem.
Clin. Chim. Acta
J. Chromatogr.
J. Steroid Biochem.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol.
J. Steroid Biochem.
J. Chromatogr.
Clin. Chim. Acta
J. Steroid Biochem.
J. Chromatogr.
J. Steroid Biochem.
J. Chromatogr.
Steroids
J. Chromatogr.
J. Chromatogr.
Steroids
J. Immunol. Methods
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
J. Clin. Endocrinol.
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
Cancer Res.
Cited by (47)
Validation of steroid sulfates deconjugation for metabolic studies. Application to human urine samples
2020, Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological MethodsMeasuring urinary cortisol and testosterone levels in male Barbary macaques: A comparison of EIA and LC–MS
2019, General and Comparative EndocrinologyCitation Excerpt :Then, we correlated the LC–MS cortisol and testosterone measurements to their respective EIA measurements from unprocessed urine to determine whether they would closely match, or whether deconjugation steps might be necessary prior to using EIA in order to improve results (Al-Dujaili, 2006). Thus, if these results did not correlate significantly, we then performed a deconjugation step (Venturelli et al., 1995; Ziegler et al., 2000) to see if the correlation improved and by this assessed the general suitability of the immunoassays used (c.f. Al-Dujaili, 2006). The deconjugation step performed (hydrolysis or solvolysis) was chosen based on the pattern of conjugation.
Determination of finasteride and its metabolite in urine by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with field-enhanced sample stacking and sweeping
2018, Journal of Chromatography ACitation Excerpt :The FESS-sweeping method was compared to the conventional MEKC method for an injection condition of 6 s at 0.5 psi. The enrichment factor of the analyte was calculated using the formula that describes that the peak area of the analyte with FESS-sweeping is divided into the peak area of the analyte with MEKC and multiplied by the dilution factor [30]. The calculated enrichment factors for finasteride and M3 were 362 and 480, respectively.
Social correlates of variation in urinary cortisol in wild male bonobos (Pan paniscus)
2012, Hormones and BehaviorMate competition, testosterone and intersexual relationships in bonobos, Pan paniscus
2012, Animal Behaviour