Research reportOn knowing how to do things: a theory of motor imagery
References (17)
Relations between verbal and gestural explanations
The functional equivalence of mental images and errors of movement
Cogn. Psychol.
(1979)- et al.
Regional cerebral blood flow patterns in visual imagery
Neuropsychologia
(1989) Cognitive Psychology and its Implications
(1980)Action, language and imagination
On knowing how to do things
- et al.
Motor imagery in Parkinson's disease
The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements
(1967)
Cited by (84)
Measures of explicit and implicit in motor learning: what we know and what we don't
2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :One of the central ideas in the current review is that explicit knowledge of motor processes is complex, possibly involving different sorts of access to multiple underlying processes. Indeed, several authors explored in detail the complex interactions between our explicit knowledge and our motor skills (Annett, 1985; Annett, 1995; Annett, 1996; Stanley and Krakauer, 2013; Krakauer, 2019). To advance a specific complexity, we distinguish an ability to describe the strategy I am currently applying from an ability to deliberately choose to implement it or stop using it (Hadjiosif and Krakauer, 2020; Maresch et al., 2020).
The effects of visual impairment on motor imagery in children and adolescents
2021, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesThe performance impact of data augmentation in CSP-based motor-imagery systems for BCI applications
2020, Biomedical Signal Processing and ControlIs imagery better than reality? Performance in imagined dart throwing
2019, Human Movement ScienceCitation Excerpt :However, one may also more drastically argue, in accordance with the propositional view, that MI makes no use of the motor system, is based on tacit knowledge, and only an epiphenomenon of other, abstract mental processes (Pylyshyn, 2002). In this view, MI is performed by drawing on abstract knowledge about the movement and its previous consequences, but the subjective experience of mentally performing it has no causal relation to the mentally unfolding action (Annett, 1996). For instance, if one knows that one’s own skills are limited, one may intentionally incorporate errors into MI rather than detecting errors based on a simulation.
Imagine squeezing a cactus: Cortical activation during affective motor imagery measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy
2018, Brain and CognitionCitation Excerpt :Especially area S2 may constitute parts of a circuit that predicts the outcome of our interactions with nearby objects to facilitate action planning. Annett (1996) proposed that during MI, not only motor execution but also prospective sensory feedback generated by overt actions were simulated. In addition, previous studies suggest that the effect of MI practice would be increased by feeling the sensations in association with the actual execution (Guillot, Lebon, & Collet, 2010; Holmes & Collins, 2001).
Regional variability in late Lower Paleolithic Amudian blade technology: Analyzing new data from Qesem, Tabun and Yabrud I
2016, Quaternary InternationalCitation Excerpt :Nevertheless, the fact that the results of the separately conducted attribute analysis of the three laminar types, CTEs and cores from Yabrud I-15 (Shimelmitz, 2009:227–300) showed similar patterns (e.g. the frequent use of removals from core bases) demonstrates the importance of the assemblage in displaying specific technological choices despite its limitations. Altogether, our results indicate that most of the technological procedures and choices made throughout the different steps of the reduction sequence appear at all three sites, indicating that the knappers shared the same ‘know-how’ (e.g. Parker and Milbrath, 1993; Annet, 1996) regarding laminar production and similar concepts of the product properties. There were however differences between the three sites in the frequencies of using specific technological procedures and choices along the reduction sequence.