Analysis of climbing accidents

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00026-3Get rights and content

Abstract

The fall of a climber is analyzed by realistic and comprehensive model calculations. Various parameters that define such a fall and the action of the belaying system to stop it are included in an equation describing the balance between the energy gained by the fall and the various channels of dissipation. The result is a representative overview about the interplay between the various parameters. From this understanding, important consequences and recommendations for safety in climbing are deduced.

Introduction

Mountaineering and, in particular, sport-climbing have become increasingly popular sports during the last two decades (Alder and Glick, 1994). Several factors stimulated this development. Increased availability of leisure time in industrialized countries together with a higher mobility but also significant improvements of safety standards made these sports more attractive to a broader public. The required level of mental commitment altered from the historical heroic climbing to a more relaxed modern approach which was made possible by technical developments of the climber's safety equipment. The unwritten law of the past—‘the leading climber never falls’—was motivated by the unpredictable and often lethal risk arising from any violation of that rule. Important improvements of the belaying system's key components like ropes, harnesses, belaying devices and, maybe most important, the development of fully reliable protection anchors made climbing much safer. The increased safety allowed a change from the ‘never fall’ to the ‘let's try’ approach which characterized the advent of modern sport-climbing. Unsuccessful trials still result in falls but now they can be stopped safely provided that both the climber and belayer are trained in the proper use of their gear. Accident statistics (Schubert, 1979, Mägdefrau and Schubert, 1984), however, tell that climbing still has considerable risks which is due to several reasons. First, mountaineering is a multifaceted sport whose subdivisions (e.g. high altitude mountaineering) do not always have the high safety standards of sport-climbing. Second, since climbing is typically done on natural rocks, the climber is confronted with ever changing situations which require a high degree of alertness and flexibility in belaying. There is no standard safety recipe which works well under all circumstances. Therefore, safe climbing requires much experience. However, most of the experience is still collected empirically which cannot be the best approach to safe climbing, considering the risks of a fall. The aim of this paper is to elucidate the physics of a climber's fall using model calculations that take into account all relevant parameters. Unlike worst-case-scenarios which, for instance, are employed for official rope tests and do not have much in common with the typical dynamic situation of a realistic fall, the modeling presented here is designed to describe realistic situations as closely as possible. The outcome is some very instructive interdependencies of parameters like braking force, length of the fall and the influence of protection points. The following sections will first give the reader who is unfamiliar with this sport the necessary background of the technical aspects of climbing, thereafter introduce the model and the necessary formulae followed by the main section containing the important results of the calculations and the discussion of their practical consequences. The concluding remarks concentrate on the main recommendations that follow from these calculations.

Section snippets

Background

Climbing is done in a group of, typically, two persons (called a party) which are connected by a rope. The procedure is as follows: starting from ground, the first climber climbs up (leads) the climb—he1 is called the leader (Fig. 1a). The other climber belays the leader (how that is done will be described later) while he is

The model

Bringing the fall to a halt means dissipating the fall energy by elastic or plastic deformation or by heat via friction. This is the basic idea behind the calculations presented here. Most simply, the physics is treated by an equation with, on one side, the energy gained during the fall due to gravity (Etotal) and on the other side, the sum of the various channels of energy dissipation Ei:Etotal=∑EiThe energy of the fall is simply equivalent to the difference of potential energy between highest

Results and discussion

The first important issue is the influence of the kind of brake used to stop the fall. Almost all brake systems act dynamically. They block the rope until a certain brake force is reached and allow the rope to run through when the load passes this threshold (dynamic braking). This limits the rope tension and dissipates part of the fall energy into heat via friction. The threshold force (braking force) should be in the right range in order to fulfill certain criteria. On one hand, it has to be

Conclusions

The calculations presented here give a good overview about the complex interdependence of all relevant parameters which characterize the physics of a fall of a leading climber. The main conclusions are: (1) The absolute necessity to avoid fall factor 2 situations by using already the stance as the first runner. The important consequence is not the reduction of the fall factor but the increase of the brake force due to the friction in the runner. (2) The recommendation to use a glove to protect

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Aidan Quinn for carefully reading and correcting the manuscript.

References (6)

  • Alder, J., Glick, D., 1994. No room, no rest. Newsweek, 46, August...
  • Mägdefrau, H., Schubert, P., 1984. Tätigkeitsbericht des Sicherheitskreises. German Alpine Club (DAV),...
  • J. Long

    Advanced Rock Climbing

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • An overview of austenitic stainless-steel rock anchors damage in an environment rich with chlorides

    2019, Engineering Failure Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, the stresses coming from climber falls are too low to represent a risk: all climbing equipment is designed with a limit of 12 kN in mind (corresponding to the fall of 80 kg climber and the maximum force that a human body can resist) which corresponds to a Jourasky stress equal to 200 MPa which is lower than the one involved in the production process. This allows us to say that the falling loads are negligible [7,33]. Thanks to the previous part of the characterization, we have an idea of the response of the components to SCC: we know the role of roughness (important for the corrosion starting point), of corrosion resistance (important for corrosion development) and of stresses (important for the corrosion rate).

  • Retrospective Study on Search and Rescue Operations in Two Prealps Areas of Italy

    2015, Wilderness and Environmental Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Mountain recreation is increasing in popularity, with some of the most typical activities being mountaineering, rock climbing, skiing, mountain running, mountain biking, backpacking, horseback riding, and mushroom picking.1–5 Despite this trend, there is still a dearth of information explaining the increase in search and rescue (SAR)4–11 and the injuries and illnesses requiring SAR assistance in mountain regions popular with tourists.12–14 In Italy, SAR assistance is provided by the National Alpine Cliff and Cave Rescue Corps (CNSAS), an operational division of the Italian Alpine Club (CAI) with emergency responsibilities such as SAR missions in mountain locations.

  • Failure analysis of a rock anchor made of stainless steel in marine environment

    2012, Engineering Failure Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    The main reason for this is the existence of fixed anchors on the rock surface that in combination with elastic ropes, provide the necessary reaction forces to gradually stop the fall. A more detailed description of the subject can be found in literature [5]. Some of the most commonly used anchoring systems in climbing are the conical bolts with expansion clip and hexagonal nut with a washer (see Fig. 1).

  • The perception of causes of accidents in mountain sports: A study based on the experiences of victims

    2009, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    Ruffier and Descamps (2003) estimate that in winter 2001–2002, the number of skiing accidents on French slopes was much higher than that cited by official statistics. This high accident rate is at least partly due to the popularity of mountain sports (Schad, 2000), as well as the emergence of new sports or free-time activities that are practiced on the mountains, such as snowboarding (Goulet, 2002; Ronning et al., 2000; Torjussen and Bahr, 2005). This increase, however, has not gone hand in hand with a greater awareness of the risks entailed in practicing mountain sports (Sombardier, 2002).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text