Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 48, Issue 2, August 1993, Pages 97-99
Clinical Radiology

Symptomatic spondylolysis: Correlation of CT and SPECT with clinical outcome

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81080-3Get rights and content

Twenty-seven patients with spondylolysis and back pain were considered for spinal fusion. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, multiplanar computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). After clinical evaluation 12 patients were not considered suitable for fusion on clinical grounds. SPECT was normal in these patients. Fifteen underwent a trial of lumbar immobilization and nine of those rendered pain free subsequently underwent spinal fusion. The results of clinical examination, lumbar immobilization, imaging and final outcome were compared in these patients. Those patients rendered pain free by surgery all had positive SPECT scans. Those with persistent pain after surgery had negative scans. This small series suggests a positive relationship between SPECT scanning and patient outcome following fusion. These findings need to be confirmed by larger studies with longer periods of follow-up.

References (10)

  • FredricksonBE et al.

    The natural history of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis

    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

    (1984)
  • HensingerRN

    Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents

    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

    (1989)
  • LoweJ et al.

    Significance of bone scintigraphy in symptomatic spondylolysis

    Spine

    (1984)
  • BodnerRJ et al.

    The use of single photon emission computed tomography in the diagnosis of low back pain in young patients

    Spine

    (1988)
  • ElsterAD et al.

    Computed tomography of spondylolisthesis: Patterns of associated pathology

    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

    (1985)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (27)

  • Low back pain in the adolescent athlete

    2014, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Numerous studies have shown bone scan and SPECT to be more sensitive than plain radiography in the diagnosis of spondylolysis, and it seems to be superior to MRI and CT in this regard, as well.12,68–75 Multiple studies have also shown that a positive bone scan or SPECT scan correlates with a symptomatic pars lesion.12,69,76–80 This finding makes SPECT a particularly useful and sensitive screening tool in adolescent athletes with low back pain.

  • Radionuclide Bone Scintigraphy in Sports Injuries

    2010, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    A major utility of bone scintigraphy is in deciding whether a pars fracture is of long standing and has no potential for healing (Fig. 14E), or is metabolically active and has capability for healing.64 A study that examined surgical outcomes for spondylolysis based on preoperative SPECT, showed that those with positive studies had a better outcome than those with negative SPECT.65 Rarely, rotational movements may lead to avulsion/traction injuries of the multifidus muscles of the lumbar spine, presenting as increased uptake in the spinous processes and posterolateral vertebral bodies.66

  • Low Back Pain in the Adolescent Athlete

    2008, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Numerous studies have shown bone scan and SPECT to be more sensitive than plain radiography in the diagnosis of spondylolysis, and they appear to be superior to MRI and CT in this regard [47–54]. There are multiple studies that have shown that a positive bone scan or SPECT correlates with a symptomatic pars lesion [48,55–59], making SPECT a particularly useful screening tool in adolescent athletes who have LBP. A significant limitation in the use of radionuclide imaging, however, is specificity.

  • The diagnosis and management of lumbar spondylolysis

    2005, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine
  • Spondylolysis

    2000, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text