AJM Theme Issue: CardiologyClinical research studyPrognostic Significance of Quantitative QRS Duration
Section snippets
Study Design
The study design is a retrospective analysis of all ECGs obtained at the Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Medical Center from March 1987 to 2000. They were digitally recorded and stored in the General Electric cardiology database system (MUSE, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis). ECGs obtained in an inpatient or emergency department setting were flagged. When a patient had more than one ECG in the database, only the first one was considered. Standardized, computerized ECG criteria as
Results
Thirty-five percent of the ECGs with QRS greater than 135 ms were not recognized as paced rhythms by the computer program and were subsequently reclassified after visual inspection and placed in the correct groups. There were 44,280 patients without BBB or paced rhythms and 18,403 patients in the abnormal ECG subset. The breakdown of patients with BBB and paced rhythms was as follows: 625 with LBBB, 1675 with right bundle branch block (RBBB), and 309 with paced rhythms.
Discussion
This study of a large cohort of general medical patients demonstrates that an increase in QRS duration is associated with an increase in the risk of CV death. Patients were separated into two main groups: those with BBB and paced rhythms and those without these findings. In patients with BBB and paced rhythms, a markedly prolonged QRS duration (>150 ms for BBB and >180 ms for paced rhythms) was found to be associated with a higher CV mortality risk. More important, in patients without BBB or
Conclusion
QRS duration provides a simple method to stratify patients as to their risk of CV death. In a general medical sample without BBB or paced rhythms, those with a QRS duration greater than 130 ms experience nearly twice the risk of CV death compared with those with a QRS duration of 110 ms or less. Similarly in patients with LBBB and RBBB, a QRS duration greater than 150 ms is associated with greater risk of CV death.
References (25)
- et al.
A point-score system for the ECG diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy
Am Heart J
(1968) - et al.
Prognostic use of a QRS scoring system after hospital discharge for initial acute myocardial infarction in the Framingham cohort
Am J Cardiol
(1990) - et al.
The Cardiac Infarction Injury Score and coronary heart disease in middle-aged and elderly menthe Zutphen Study
J Clin Epidemiol
(1995) - et al.
Natural history of isolated bundle branch block
Am J Cardiol
(1996) - et al.
Bundle branch block in patients with chronic coronary artery diseaseangiographic correlates and prognostic significance
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1987) - et al.
Left bundle-branch block is associated with increased 1-year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failurea report from the Italian network on congestive heart failure
Am Heart J
(2002) - et al.
Clinical-electrocardiographic correlates of newly acquired left bundle branch blockthe Framingham Study
Am J Cardiol
(1985) - et al.
Comparative features of newly acquired left and right bundle branch block in the general populationthe Framingham study
Am J Cardiol
(1981) - et al.
Usefulness of QRS duration in the absence of bundle branch block as an early predictor of survival in non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction
Am J Cardiol
(2002) - et al.
Congestive heart failure and QRS durationestablishing prognosis study
Chest
(2002)
QRS duration and mortality in patients with congestive heart failure
Am Heart J
Electrocardiography and Doppler echocardiography for risk stratification in patients with chronic heart failureincremental prognostic value of QRS duration and a restrictive mitral filling pattern
J Am Coll Cardiol
Cited by (121)
Associations between primary care electrocardiography and non-Alzheimer dementia
2022, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular DiseasesClinical factors associated with the intraventricular conduction disturbances in Swiss middle-aged adults: The CoLaus|PsyCoLaus study
2021, International Journal of Cardiology
Manuscript submitted on May 27, 2005, and accepted in revised form on August 12, 2005.