Original article
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field and Exercises in Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effects of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) and exercises in reducing pain and improving function and muscle strength in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS).

Design

Double-blind, randomized controlled trial with a 3-month posttreatment follow-up.

Setting

Outpatient rehabilitation of a public hospital.

Participants

Patients (N=56) between 40 and 60 years of age, with a diagnosis of SIS, were randomly assigned to receive active PEMF (n=26; mean age, 50.1y) or placebo PEMF (n=30; mean age, 50.8y).

Interventions

After 3 weeks of active or placebo PEMF, both groups performed the same program of exercises that focused on shoulder strengthening.

Main Outcome Measures

A visual analog scale, the University of California/Los Angeles shoulder rating scale, the Constant-Murley shoulder score, and handheld dynamometry for muscle strength were used as outcome measures at baseline (pretreatment), at 3 weeks (after active or placebo PEMF), at 9 weeks (postexercise), and at 3 months posttreatment.

Results

Patients in the active PEMF group had a higher level of function and less pain at all follow-up time frames compared with baseline (P<.05). However, the placebo PEMF group had increased function and reduced pain only at the 9-week and 3-month follow-ups (P<.05)—that is, after performing the associated exercises. For the shoulder dynamometry, the active PEMF group had increased strength for lateral rotation at 9 weeks (P<.05), and increased strength for medial rotation at 9 weeks and 3 months (both P<.05) when compared with baseline. There was no significant difference for shoulder strength in the placebo PEMF group (P>.05), as well as no significant differences (P>.05) for all outcome measures.

Conclusions

The combination of PEMF and shoulder exercises is effective in improving function and muscle strength and decreasing pain in patients with SIS. However, these results should be carefully interpreted because of the lack of differences between groups.

Section snippets

Participants

Fifty-six patients aged 40 to 60 years (N=56; mean age ± SD, 50.5±8.9y), with a diagnosis of SIS, were randomly assigned to receive active PEMF (n=26; mean age ± SD, 50.1±8.2y) or placebo PEMF (n=30; mean age ± SD, 50.8±9.6y). After 3 weeks of active or placebo PEMF, both groups performed the same program of exercises focusing on shoulder strengthening. Four patients who were in the active PEMF group and 6 patients who were in the placebo PEMF group did not complete the study. All study

Results

At 3 months, 4 subjects in the active PEMF group and 6 subjects in the placebo PEMF group were lost during follow-up. Therefore, all per-protocol data analyses were performed with 22 subjects in the active PEMF group and 24 subjects in the placebo PEMF group.

Discussion

The results of this randomized controlled trial demonstrated that a 3-week intervention with PEMF is effective for improving function and reducing pain in patients with SIS. A combination of shoulder exercises is essential for increasing muscle strength and increasing the overall effectiveness of these improvements. Both active and placebo PEMF groups showed improvements for all functional and pain outcome measures when combined with shoulder exercises. The group that received active PEMF and

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the combination of PEMF and shoulder exercises is effective in improving function and muscle strength and decreasing pain in patients with SIS. However, these results should be carefully interpreted because of the lack of between-group differences.

Suppliers

  • a.

    Meditea, Viamonte 2255 / 2265, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

  • b.

    Lafayette Instrument Co, PO Box 5729, Lafayette, IN 47903.

  • c.

    SPSS Inc, 233 S Wacker Dr, 11th Fl, Chicago, IL 60606.

References (36)

  • D. Fodor et al.

    Shoulder impingement syndrome: correlations between clinical tests and ultrasonographic findings

    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil

    (2009)
  • H. Graichen et al.

    Subacromial space width changes during abduction and rotation: a 3-D MR imaging study

    Surg Radiol Anat

    (1999)
  • C.S. Neer

    Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1972)
  • J.P. Haahr et al.

    Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (2005)
  • I. Lombardi et al.

    Progressive resistance training in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

    Arthritis Rheum

    (2008)
  • A. Rabini et al.

    Effects of local microwave diathermy on shoulder pain and function in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy in comparison to subacromial corticosteroid injections: a single-blind randomized trial

    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther

    (2012)
  • C.J. McCarthy et al.

    Pulsed electromagnetic energy treatment offers no clinical benefit in reducing the pain of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

    BMC Musculoskelet Disord

    (2006)
  • N.M. Shupak

    Therapeutic uses of pulsed magnetic-field exposure: a review

    Radio Sci Bull

    (2003)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Physical Therapy Combined With Subacromial Cortisone Injection Is a First-Line Treatment Whereas Acromioplasty With Physical Therapy Is Best if Nonoperative Interventions Fail for the Management of Subacromial Impingement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

      2022, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Alpha was set at 0.05 and all analyses were conducted in RStudio software, version 1.2.1335 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The systematic literature search identified a total of 11,085 studies, of which 35 met eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis (Fig 1, Table 2).19,20,22,26,27,39,42,52-54,63-87 The 35 studies included a total of 3,643 shoulders and 42% of patients were female (Table 3).

    • Electromagnetic Transduction Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Preliminary Report on a New Technology

      2017, Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The heel cushion size of 10 mm in the present study appears thicker than that used in other studies, which typically used a lower thickness (17). Other types of electromagnetic modalities have been critically studied for soft tissue injury in humans; however, these have typically involved the shoulder (14,16). The modality most stringently studied for mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy is ESWT/RSWT, the reference standard (7,8).

    • Combined Use of Diadynamic Currents and Manual Therapy on Myofascial Trigger Points in Patients With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

      2018, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kaya et al30 found no differences between Kinesio Taping with exercise and MT with exercise, as both methods achieved similar results in reducing pain and disability in subacromial impingement after 6 weeks of treatment. Considering the use of physical agents on patients with shoulder impingement syndrome, Galace de Freitas et al31 found that patients treated with exercises and a pulsed electromagnetic field experienced increases in both muscle strength and function as well as a greater reduction in pain intensity when compared to a group submitted to exercises and sham pulsed electromagnetic field (machine switched off). Yavuz et al32 compared the effects of therapeutic laser and ultrasound in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome and found that both treatments led to reductions in pain and functional disability.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Clinical Trial Registration No.: NCT01452204.

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has conferred or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text