Editorial
Could the New England Journal of Medicine Be Biased Against Arthroscopic Knee Surgery?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.02.013Get rights and content

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (39)

  • Internet and Social Media Contribute to Medical Research Journal Growth

    2022, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
  • Degenerative Meniscus Lesions: An Expert Consensus Statement Using the Modified Delphi Technique

    2020, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Recent critical reviews of the literature have determined that valid conclusions cannot be drawn with regard to surgical versus nonoperative treatment of degenerative meniscal tears.19,20 Finally, there may also be editorial bias against arthroscopic surgery, with some editors accepting studies limited by potential selection bias, design flaws, and β error.21-23 Because of the biases, poor study quality, and weaknesses of the current literature, current treatment algorithms lack clarity.11,12,24

  • Degenerative tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus: correlation between MRI findings and outcome following intra-articular steroid/bupivacaine injection of the knee

    2019, Clinical Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Because degenerative meniscal tears commonly accompany knee osteoarthritis, they may be difficult to isolate and to diagnose clinically.1,4 There has been much debate in recent years about the best treatment for degenerative meniscal lesions.5–10 Treatment options include watchful waiting, physiotherapy, medical treatment with acetaminophen and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], intra-articular injection with corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy, and ultimately total knee replacement.8,9,11

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text