Stress fracture injury in young military men and women☆
Introduction
Each July, approximately 1200 new recruits enter the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland, as plebes. Plebe summer is a physically challenging, 2-month indoctrination of midshipmen into military life. Physical challenges include the normal activities associated with military life (e.g., instruction, formations, marching, and drilling) and the formal morning physical education program designed to enhance the physical fitness level of the incoming midshipmen.
This physical training program, consisting of early morning runs (approximately 10 mi per week; Fig. 1) and calisthenics (60–90 min of stretching, push-ups, sit-ups, pull-ups, sprinting, and agility drills) 5 days a week, initiates changes in metabolic events that contribute to a loss of body weight in some recruits. Intense exercise training may also contribute to muscle fatigue and soreness, dehydration, muscle structural damage, muscle swelling, central nervous system fatigue, and increased use of nutrient stores. Specifically, rigorous training may increase metabolism, increase activation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, deplete muscle glycogen, and contribute to muscle amino acid loss, hepatic gluconeogenesis, and a negative nitrogen balance [1], [2], [3].
The physical demands on plebes result in common medical situations such as heat strain, dehydration, blisters, sprains, and various musculoskeletal overuse injuries. Of the overuse injuries among plebes during their first summer training, stress fractures are a persistent medical problem: It affects 3% of the men and 10% of the women (personal communication, Brigade Medical Officer MKD), resulting in substantial loss of training opportunities and a decrease in physical performance. These injuries, which occur during a critical period of training and indoctrination, impact availability for continued training.
Stress fractures, also known as fatigue or march fractures, have remained a well-recognized medical condition since Breithaupt [4] initially described them in 1855. Stress fracture injuries are ubiquitous among military organizations and disproportionately affect women [5]. Within the U.S. military, reported rates for stress fracture among new recruits range from 2% to 12%, contributing to substantial lost training time [6], [7], [8], [9]. Stress fractures in military recruits commonly occur in the tibia, femur, metatarsals, and pelvis, and they present with the insidious onset of localized pain that worsens with activity [5], [7], [8], [10]. A low level of physical fitness at entry into military recruit training may be a contributing factor to training-induced musculoskeletal injury. Shaffer et al. [11] have reported that baseline physical fitness among Marine recruits is poor. Less than 15% of recruits were in excellent physical condition, and fewer than half the recruits ran three times per week or averaged a training distance of more than 2.5 mi.
Bending forces have been implicated as the most important factor in the pathogenesis of stress fractures [12]. Most military recruits report the onset of symptoms of stress fractures between Days 10 and 12 of training [6]. It has been hypothesized that as the mechanical forces accumulate, the rate of bone resorption exceeds bone remodeling and repair, and the effective loading area is decreased. Therefore, because force remains constant, stress is increased. This process progresses until the stress exceeds the limit of the bone, and fracture occurs. Thus, stress fractures occur when bone strain increases osteoclastic resorption beyond remodeling by osteoblasts [6]. Most military recruits report onset of symptoms of stress fractures early in the training cycle [6], which may represent structural fatigue produced from repetitive mechanical forces.
A contributing scenario is that of a progressive decline in the muscular support of the bone, which may be caused by several factors. These factors may include a smaller muscle volume [7], and smaller muscles may be weaker and unable to provide adequate support for the bone. Muscles that are not adapted to repetitive work and therefore lack endurance may fatigue, be unable to support the long bones of the lower extremity, and fail because of large reductions in muscle glycogen stores [13], [14] secondary to repetitive, high-intensity training programs and because of the exercising individual's failure to achieve adequate energy balance and nutritional support from the diet [13], [14].
Investigators have attempted to identify risk factors for stress fracture, including previous aerobic fitness and activity level, body somatotype, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), motivation, city versus country origin, hyperpronation of subtalar joint, decreased muscle strength, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, decreased calcium, decreased bone density, tibia torsion, narrow tibias, and increased hip external rotation [6], [7], [10], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. However, as indicated by Burr [23] and Jones et al. [24] in their extensive literature reviews and to our knowledge, no study has compared subjects sustaining a stress fracture injury during military recruit training with matched uninjured controls based on gender, BMI, and aerobic physical fitness data that were collected before they entered military recruit training.
Therefore, the purpose of our study was to compare young men and women at the United States Naval Academy who sustained lower extremity stress fracture during a military summer training program with a matched group of uninjured recruits to identify factors that may increase the risk of a stress fracture.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
There were 1224 midshipman in the class of 2000, of which 203 were female (17%). During the study period (July through August 2000), 40 plebes (23 men, 17 women) were diagnosed with 58 stress fractures. The incidence of stress fractures for the plebe indoctrination was 3.3% overall, 2.3% for male midshipmen, and 8.4% for female midshipmen. Of the 58 stress fractures, 74% (n = 43) were in the tibia, 9% (n = 5) were in the metatarsals, 5% (n = 3) were in the femur, 5% (n = 3) were in the fibula,
Demographics
Within the same gender, there were no differences in Day 1 age, height, weight, and BMI between fracture subjects and controls. Comparing genders, male plebes were nearly 8 months older, 15 cm taller, and 13 kg heavier than female plebes, but BMI was not different (23.8 ± 0.29) between gender. Twenty of 26 women (77%) and 29 of 36 men (81%) were Caucasian. In the subjects, stress fractures (confirmed by radiograph or bone scan) occurred in the tibia (n = 18) in all 13 women, and in the tibia (n
Discussion
To our knowledge, our study is the first to compare 18-year-old military men and women with stress fracture to uninjured controls matched by gender, age, BMI, and preadmission aerobic physical performance in terms of demographic, injury, and outcome data for the purpose of identifying possible risk factors for stress fracture injury. Unlike other military recruits [11], plebes enter the Academy with a high level of physical fitness: 85% of this incoming class (of whom 15% were women) had a
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Thomas Beck, PhD, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, for providing the software for the analysis of the distal tibia DEXA scans. The Chief, Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery, Washington, D.C., Clinical Investigation Program, sponsored this study.
References (48)
- et al.
Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors
Bone
(2000) Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones
J. Biomech
(1991)- et al.
Dual X-ray absorptiometry total body bone mineral content and bone mineral density in 18- to 22-year-old Caucasian men
Bone
(2000) - et al.
Bone mineral density and total body bone mineral content in 18- to 22-year-old women
Bone
(2004) - et al.
Scaling of long bone fracture strength with animal mass
J. Biomech
(1989) - et al.
Short-term effects of a progestational contraceptive drug on food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body weight in young women
Am. J. Clin. Nutr
(2001) - et al.
The area moment of inertia of the tibia: a risk factor for stress fractures
J. Biomech
(1989) - et al.
Mechanisms of exercise-induced muscle fibre injury
Sports Med
(1991) - et al.
Physical performance and metabolic recovery among lean, healthy men following a prolonged energy deficit
Int. J. Sports Med
(1997) Regulation of glucose fluxes during exercise in the postabsorptive state
Annu. Rev. Physiol
(1995)
Low bone density is an etiologic factor for stress fractures in athletes
Ann. Intern. Med
Stress fracture—A preventable training injury
Mil. Med
Stress fractures of the foot in female soldiers: a two-year survey
Mil. Med
Stress fractures in men and women undergoing military training
J. Bone Joint Surg
Use of simple measures of physical activity to predict stress fractures in young men undergoing a rigorous physical training program
Am. J. Epidemiol
An analysis of the biomechanical mechanism of tibial stress fractures among Israeli infantry recruits. A prospective study
Clin. Orthop
Muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged exercise on successive days
J. Appl. Physiol
Leg muscle metabolism during exercise in the heat and cold
Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol
A 12-month prospective study of the relationship between stress fractures and bone turnover in athletes
Calcif. Tissue Int
Biomechanical analysis of fatigue-related foot injury mechanisms in athletes and recruits during intensive marching
Med. Biol. Eng. Comput
External rotation of the hip. A predictor of risk for stress fractures
Clin. Orthop
Fatigue during stretch-shortening cycle exercises: changes in mechanical performance of human skeletal muscle
Int. J. Sports Med
Fatigue-related loading imbalance on the shank in running: a possible factor in stress fractures
Ann. Biomed. Eng
Cited by (139)
Pathological femoral neck fracture in a male patient due to non-simultaneous bilateral transient hip osteoporosis: A case report: Statements and Declarations
2023, Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and TraumaCurrent risks factors and emerging biomarkers for bone stress injuries in military personnel
2023, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportImpact loading in female runners with single and multiple bone stress injuries during fresh and exerted conditions
2023, Journal of Sport and Health ScienceAssociation between movement patterns and risk of musculoskeletal injuries in navy cadets: A cohort study
2021, Physical Therapy in SportCitation Excerpt :In military high school institutions, students are required to perform regular physical exercise, at least three times a week, for three years, which is not mandatory in civil education institutions (Glavač et al., 2015). Subsequently, during the officer training course, the cadets perform different types of training under conditions with high volume and inadequate recovery (Armstrong et al., 2004; Kyrolainen et al., 2018; Popovich et al., 2000), which results in a high incidence of injuries (Carow et al., 2016). The impact of injuries often impairs the professional activities.
Feeding female soldiers: Consideration of sex-specific nutrition recommendations to optimise the health and performance of military personnel
2021, Journal of Science and Medicine in SportCitation Excerpt :Amenorrhoea, a clinical endpoint of severe and prolonged energy restriction, is associated with impaired bone health; bone mass,87,88 architecture and strength,87–90 are deteriorated in amenorrhoeic athletes compared with eumenorrhoeic counterparts. Menstrual disturbances in servicewomen are accompanied by an increased risk of stress fractures81,91–94 and musculoskeletal injuries,95 and low bone mass,96 although these findings are not supported by all studies.80,97–101 Less severe energy restriction (≥30 kcal·kgFFM·d−1), however, impairs bone metabolism independent of reproductive and oestrogen status in a dose-dependent manner by suppressing bone formation.102
Intracortical remodelling increases in highly loaded bone after exercise cessation
2024, Journal of Anatomy
- ☆
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.