Elsevier

Manual Therapy

Volume 16, Issue 2, April 2011, Pages 148-154
Manual Therapy

Original article
Manual or exercise therapy for long-standing adductor-related groin pain: A randomised controlled clinical trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.09.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Hypothesis

A multi-modal treatment program (MMT) is more effective than exercise therapy (ET) for the treatment of long-standing adductor-related groin pain.

Study design

Single blinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial.

Methods

Patients: Athletes with pain at the proximal insertion of the adductor muscles on palpation and resisted adduction for at least two months. Interventions: ET: a home-based ET and a structured return to running program with instruction on three occasions from a sports physical therapist. MMT: Heat, Van den Akker manual therapy followed by stretching and a return to running program. Primary outcome: time to return to full sports participation. Secondary outcome measures: objective outcome score and the visual analogue pain score during sports activities. Outcome was assessed at 0, 6, 16 and 24 weeks.

Results

Athletes who received MMT returned to sports quicker (12.8 weeks, SD 6.0) than athletes in the ET group (17.3 weeks, SD 4.4. p = 0.043). Only 50–55% of athletes in both groups made a full return to sports. There was no difference between the groups in objective outcome (p = 0.72) or VAS during sports (p = 0.12).

Conclusions

The multi-modal program resulted in a significantly quicker return to sports than ET plus return to running but neither treatment was very effective.

Introduction

Groin pain is a frequent complaint in athletes. It occurs commonly in sports involving repeated sprinting, twisting, kicking and cutting such as soccer, rugby, Australian rules football and (ice-) hockey (Bradshaw and McCrory, 1997, Jansen et al., 2008b). In football groin injuries have been reported to account for about 10% of all injuries (Hawkins et al., 2001). Most of these injuries will recover quickly and in one study only three of 22 groin injured athletes still had complaints after three weeks (Arnason et al., 2004).

When groin pain does go on to be long-standing it can be hard to treat, with a relatively long period for return to full sports activity (Hölmich et al., 1999). Adductor-related groin pain has been reported to account for 58% of groin injuries in all sports and 69% of groin injuries in footballers (Hölmich, 2007).

Exercise therapy (ET) is recommended as the first line of treatment after a period of rest or restricted activity (Jansen et al., 2008a). In a recent systematic review (Machotka et al., 2009) on the effect of ET only one randomised controlled trial (Hölmich et al., 1999) was identified. Both reviews noted the lack of randomised controlled studies on the treatment of athletic groin injuries and recommended that more trials be performed in this area. The study of Hölmich et al. showed the value of ET (level 1 evidence) for athletes with long-standing adductor-related groin pain. 79% of athletes who underwent ET were able to resume sports at their pre-injury level. The median time to return to sport was 18.5 weeks (range 13–26). At present ET can be considered the therapy with the highest level of evidence (usual care) for the treatment of adductor-related groin pain.

The results of a multi-modal treatment program (MMT) using heat, Van Den Akker manual therapy method, stretching and a return to running program have been studied previously retrospectively (Weir et al., 2008). The study reported promising results with 27 of the 30 athletes (90%) being able to return to sporting activities after treatment. A weakness of the study was the retrospective design and the lack of a control group. The aim of the study was to compare the new therapy (MMT) to the current therapy with the highest level of evidence (ET (usual care)), for the treatment of long-standing adductor-related groin pain, in a single blinded prospective randomised clinical trial.

Section snippets

Subjects

Athletes were referred to the sports medicine department of a large district hospital by local physiotherapists, general practitioners and sports medicine physicians. All athletes were assessed for suitability to participate by a single sports physician, experienced in the field of athletic groin injuries, who used a structured examination protocol. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1. Physical examination was used to assess for the presence of adductor pain and has been

Results

One hundred athletes were referred for inclusion. Forty six athletes were not suitable for inclusion (hip joint problem 12, primary iliopsoas pain 10, pain above the conjoined tendon 10, current lower back pain 8, unwilling to participate 6). There were 53 males and one female included in the study. Fig. 3 shows the allocation of the athletes in the study.

Thirty seven (69%) played soccer, three (6%) played rugby, three (6%) did distance running, three (6%) played field hockey, two (4%) were

Discussion

In this study the athletes (50%) who were successfully treated with the MMT were able to return to sporting activities more quickly (12.8 weeks) when compared to those treated with the ET (55%) program (17.3 weeks). There was no significant difference in the number of athletes able to return to sporting activities between the two treatment groups. The objective treatment outcome and pain scores during sporting activities did not differ between the two treatment groups.

The results of the MMT in

Conclusion

This single blinded randomised controlled clinical trial showed that the MMT was safe and equally effective treatment for athletes with long-standing adductor-related groin pain as an ET program. After 4 months both groups showed significant decrease of VAS pain scores during sport. The athletes in the MMT group who made a full return to sports did so significantly quicker than those who performed ET. Further studies should evaluate if a combination of all treatments would improve effectiveness

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Aad Scheffer for making the balance boards for the exercise therapy group. Many thanks to Ton Kraan and Marcel Thomas for instructing the athletes in the exercise therapy group. Many thanks to Cora Van der Heijden, Ank de Vries and Pauline Verschoor for coordinating athletes through the study.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text