Original articlePrognostic factors and course for successful clinical outcome quality of life and patients' perceived effect after a cognitive behavior therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: A 12-months prospective study
Introduction
Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is one of the most prevalent health problems (Heneweer et al., 2007). Although it is known that physical, psychosocial and personal factors play a role, the way they interact with each other remains unclear. Several prognostic models for non-specific low back pain have been described; however, the prognostic factors varied depending on the choice of, for example, the prognostic variables, outcome definition, or the stage of pain (e.g. acute, sub-acute or chronic) (Kent and Keating, 2008, Costa Lda et al., 2009, Verkerk et al., 2012). A recent systematic review focusing on musculoskeletal complaints considered relevant for physical therapists in primary care, reported that the available prediction models are not yet ready to be applied in clinical practice because of their preliminary stage of development (van Oort et al., 2012). Also, the available models for back pain patients need external validation and impact evaluation before applying them in daily practice (van Oort et al., 2012). Compared to patients with (sub) acute NSLBP, patients with CNSLBP are the least investigated regarding their course and prognosis, especially in relation to the outcomes ‘quality of life’ and ‘global perceived effect’ (GPE) (Verkerk et al., 2012). Therefore, clinicians and researchers increasingly recognize the importance of such patient-reported outcome measures in the evaluation of the effectiveness of treatment, prognosis or course of CNSLBP (Bombardier, 2000).
Achieving and maintaining the best possible quality of life is a primary goal of care and several questionnaires are available to measure this item, including the Short Form 36-items Health Survey (SF-36) (Aktekin et al., 2009). With regard to evaluating GPE, the patient can be asked to rate how much their condition (i.e. important aspects of recovery) has improved or deteriorated since some predefined time point (Kamper et al., 2010). The present study was designed to investigate the course of and identify prognostic factors (with internal validation) for quality of life and GPE in patients treated for CNSLBP.
Section snippets
Population
Patients were recruited between January 2003 and December 2008 in a prospective cohort study from a multidisciplinary outpatient rehabilitation clinic the Spine & Joint Centre (SJC; Rotterdam, The Netherlands). The Medical Ethics Committee of SJC approved the study protocol and all patients provided informed consent. Details on the study design are described elsewhere (Verkerk et al., 2011). Inclusion criteria were: 1) men and women aged ≥18 years; 2) having CNSLBP defined as a duration of LBP
Population
A total of 1760 patients [mean age 40.1 (10.6) years; 74.3% women] with CNSLBP participated in the study. Of these 1760 patients, 1696 (96.4%) completed the 2-month multidisciplinary treatment, 1564 (88.9%) participated in the 5-month follow-up, and 965 (54.8%) completed the 12-month follow-up after start of therapy. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the 1760 patients and the distribution of the possible prognostic factors (Verkerk et al., 2011).
Course at 2 and 5 months
At 2 and 5-months follow-up the
Discussion
In the present study, a main finding is the sustained 10% improvement on the PCS (76.3% of the population) up to 5 months and on GPE (60.3%) up to 12 months. For MCS this 10% improvement is slightly less (20.6%) at 5 months, but a mean of 50 (SD of 10) represents normal health and function (Walsh et al., 2003). Some patients reported no improvement on GPE at 5 and 12-months follow-up (15% and 20.6%, respectively).
The present study shows that improvement in quality of life (on SF-36 MCS) at
Acknowledgment
The study was financial supported by Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences and Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References (41)
- et al.
Trajectories of low back pain
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2013) - et al.
Low back pain across life course
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2013) - et al.
Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment
J Clin Epidemiol
(1998) - et al.
Psychosocial predictors of health-related quality of life and health service utilisation in people with chronic low back pain
Pain
(2008) - et al.
Can we predict poor recovery from recent-onset nonspecific low back pain? A systematic review
Man Ther
(2008) - et al.
Clinically important outcomes in low back pain
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2005) - et al.
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
J Clin Epidemiol
(1996) Indicators of organizational readiness for clinical information technology/systems innovation: a Delphi study
Int J Med Inform
(2001)- et al.
Preliminary state of development of prediction models for primary care physical therapy: a systematic review
J Clin Epidemiol
(2012) - et al.
The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus
J Clin Epidemiol
(1998)
A comparison of four different HRQoL generic questionnaire in five different patient groups
Rheumatol Int
The cost of dichotomising continuous variables
BMJ
Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model
BMJ
Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study
BMJ
A low back-specific version of the SF-36 Physical Functioning scale
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
Long-term trajectories of back pain: cohort study with 7-year follow-up
BMJ Open
Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 health survey in Medicare managed care
Health Care Financ Rev
Multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation for chronic low back pain
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study
Eur Spine J
Cited by (8)
Do prognostic variables predict a set of outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain: a long-term follow-up secondary analysis of a randomized control trial
2019, Journal of Manual and Manipulative TherapyPsychological factors are associated with the outcome of physiotherapy for people with shoulder pain: A multicentre longitudinal cohort study
2018, British Journal of Sports MedicineLatent class analysis derived subgroups of low back pain patients - Do they have prognostic capacity?
2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders