Physical Activity and Cancer Control

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2007.08.002Get rights and content

Objectives

To provide an overview and update of physical activity (PA) research across the entire cancer control continuum.

Data Sources

Previous cancer control frameworks and selected PA and cancer research that has been published over the past 5 years.

Conclusion

There have been major scientific advances in PA research across many, but not all, of the cancer control categories over the past 5 years.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Nurses should have a comprehensive understanding of the potential role of PA across the entire cancer control continuum.

Section snippets

A Framework for Physical Activity and Cancer Control

In 2001, we proposed a framework called Physical Exercise Across the Cancer Experience (PEACE) to help organize, focus, and stimulate research on PA and cancer control.3 At that time, our focus was primarily on the supportive care outcomes of PA (eg, physical functioning, quality of life [QOL]) with less attention to the clinical outcomes (ie, disease and treatment-related outcomes). In 2004, we adapted this framework to more explicitly highlight the clinical outcomes.4 Here, we present a

Physical Activity and Cancer Prevention

Physical activity may reduce the risk of developing a primary cancer. Cancer prevention remains the most studied and reviewed cancer control outcome. There are now over 250 studies that have examined PA and cancer prevention,6 and the general consensus is that PA is: (a) convincingly associated with the reduced risk of developing colon and breast cancers, (b) probably associated with the reduced risk of endometrial cancer, and (c) possibly associated with the reduced risk of prostate and lung

Physical Activity Cancer Detection

Physical activity may influence cancer detection in two distinct ways. First, acute and/or chronic PA may directly influence cancer detection by affecting the sensitivity and/or specificity of screening tests (eg, mammography, prostate specific antigen, fecal occult blood). Second, PA may indirectly affect cancer detection by facilitating adherence to cancer screening behaviors, thereby resulting in earlier detection. Research on the effects of PA on the sensitivity/specificity of cancer

Physical Activity and Treatment Preparation/Coping

Physical activity may influence treatment preparation/coping in several important ways including: (a) helping individuals cope with their disease physically and emotionally while awaiting treatments, (b) improving health/fitness sufficiently to allow difficult treatments to go forward (eg, lung surgery, cardiotoxic drugs), and (c) delaying the need for treatment by managing the disease and its symptoms. There is still very limited research examining PA for treatment preparation/coping. Jones et

Physical Activity and Treatment Effectiveness/Coping

Physical activity may influence treatment effectiveness/coping in several important ways including: (a) managing the treatment side effects and toxicities, maintaining physical functioning, preventing muscle loss and fat gain, and improving mood states and QOL, (b) facilitating the completion of difficult treatments, and/or (c) potentiating the efficacy of cancer treatments. PA and treatment effectiveness/coping has been an active area of research over the past 5 years that has been summarized

Physical Activity and Recovery/Rehabilitation

Physical activity may help cancer survivors expedite recovery from the acute effects of treatments. This cancer control category is important because over 50% of cancer survivors indicate a preference for beginning PA programs immediately or soon after treatments rather than during treatments.54, 55, 56, 57 Moreover, recent meta-analyses have observed that the effects of PA interventions may be larger in the survivorship time period compared with the treatment period,33, 34 although no direct

Physical Activity and Disease Prevention/Health Promotion

Physical activity may help cancer survivors: (a) optimize QOL and physical functioning, (b) manage the chronic and/or late-appearing effects of treatments (eg, fatigue, lymphedema, fat gain, bone loss), (c) reduce the likelihood of their cancer recurring, and (d) reduce the likelihood of developing other chronic diseases for which they may be at increased risk (eg, osteoporosis, heart disease, diabetes). PA and disease prevention/health promotion research may lend itself to a population-based

Physical Activity and Palliation

Physical activity may help cancer survivors manage symptoms, improve mobility, slow functional decline, and maintain QOL at the end of life. Research on PA and cancer palliation is still very limited, but recent preliminary research has reported promising results.72, 73, 74 Oldervoll et al73, 74 conducted a prospective phase II pilot study to examine the effects of structured PA on 34 advanced cancer survivors with clinician-estimated survival between 3 and 12 months. The trial reported that

Physical Activity and Survival

Physical activity may help cancer survivors live longer by: reducing the risk of cancer recurrence or slowing cancer progression and reducing the risk of other life-threatening diseases including second primary cancers. This cancer control category has received increased attention from PA researchers over the past 5 years. Some studies have examined post-diagnosis PA and cancer survival,75, 76, 77 while others have examined pre-diagnosis PA and cancer survival.78, 79, 80, 81 The results have

Physical Activity Behavior Change for Cancer Control

Physical activity and cancer control research will require supportive research in behavior change. PA behavior change research for cancer (disease) prevention has been pursued for many years, but PA behavior change research for cancer survivors is a more recent phenomenon that has increased significantly over the past 5 years.82 The general findings have shown low PA participation rates during and after treatments and some medical (eg, disease stage, type of treatments), demographic (eg, age,

Future Research Directions

This overview has highlighted many important scientific advances in PA and cancer control research over the past 5 years, but there are many unanswered questions that remain. To this end, we provide general suggestions for future research efforts under the eight cancer control categories highlighted in the PACC framework (Table 3). In addition to the recommendations for cancer control, we offer research directions for PA behavior change research. It will be useful to determine: (a) if primary

Conclusion

Physical activity and cancer control research has increased exponentially over the past 5 years. Significant progress has been made in many, but not all, of the cancer control categories. Research to date suggests that PA interventions may reduce the risk of developing some cancers, help cancer survivors cope with and recover from treatments, improve the health of long-term cancer survivors, and possibly even reduce the risk of recurrence and extend survival after a cancer diagnosis. Nurses

Kerry S. Courneya, PhD: Professor and Canada Research Chair in Physical Activity and Cancer, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

References (91)

  • K.S. Courneya et al.

    Framework PEACE: an organizational model for examining physical exercise across the cancer experience

    Ann Behav Med

    (2001)
  • K.S. Courneya et al.

    Physical activity in cancer survivors: implications for recurrence and mortality

    Cancer Ther

    (2004)
  • M. Hewitt et al.

    From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition

    (2006)
  • A.V. Patel et al.

    Recreational physical activity and sedentary behavior in relation to ovarian cancer risk in a large cohort of US women

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2006)
  • S.C. Chang et al.

    Association of energy intake and energy balance with postmenopausal breast cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial

    Cancer Epidemiol Bimarkers Prev

    (2006)
  • E. Weiderpass et al.

    Prospective study of physical activity in different periods of life and the risk of ovarian cancer

    Int J Cancer

    (2006)
  • R.G. Biesma et al.

    Physical activity and risk of ovarian cancer: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study (The Netherlands)

    Cancer Causes Control

    (2006)
  • S.Y. Pan et al.

    Obesity, high energy intake, lack of physical activity, and the risk of kidney cancer

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2006)
  • B.C. Chiu et al.

    Body mass index, physical activity, and risk of renal cell carcinoma

    Int J Obesity

    (2006)
  • B.A. van Dijk et al.

    Relation of height, body mass, energy intake, and physical activity to risk of renal cell carcinoma: results from the Netherlands Cohort Study

    Am J Epidemiol

    (2004)
  • S. Mahabir et al.

    Physical activity and renal cell cancer risk in a cohort of male smokers

    Int J Cancer

    (2004)
  • Y. Lin et al.

    Obesity, physical activity and the risk of pancreatic cancer in a large Japanese cohort

    Int J Cancer

    (2007)
  • U. Nothlings et al.

    Body mass index and physical activity as risk factors for pancreatic cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort Study

    Cancer Causes Control

    (2007)
  • A. Berrington de Gonzalez et al.

    Anthropometry, physical activity, and the risk of pancreatic cancer in the European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomakers Prev

    (2006)
  • P.J. Sinner et al.

    Lack of association of physical activity and obesity with incident pancreatic cancer in elderly women

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarks Prev

    (2005)
  • A.V. Patel et al.

    Obesity, recreational physical activity, and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large U.S. Cohort

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2005)
  • A.K. Samad et al.

    A meta-analysis of the association of physical activity with reduced risk of colorectal cancer

    Colorectal Dis

    (2005)
  • A. Tardon et al.

    Leisure-time physical activity and lung cancer: a meta-analysis

    Cancer Causes Control

    (2005)
  • E.M. Monninkhof et al.

    Physical activity and breast cancer: a systematic review

    Epidemiol

    (2007)
  • A. Cust et al.

    Physical activity and endometrial cancer risk: a review of the current evidence, biologic mechanisms and the quality of physical activity assessment methods

    Cancer Causes Control

    (2007)
  • A. Rundle

    Molecular epidemiology of physical activity and cancer

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2005)
  • A. McTiernan

    Intervention studies in exercise and cancer prevention

    Med Sci Sports Exer

    (2003)
  • M.L. Irwin

    Randomized controlled trials of physical activity and breast cancer prevention

    Exer Sport Sci Rev

    (2006)
  • I.K. Larsen et al.

    Lifestyle as a predictor for colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic individuals

    BMC Gastroenterol

    (2006)
  • A. Bardia et al.

    Recreational physical activity and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer based on hormone receptor status

    Arch Intern Med

    (2006)
  • S.A. Adams et al.

    Association of physical activity with hormone receptor status: the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2006)
  • L.W. Jones et al.

    Effects of presurgical exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients undergoing thoracic surgery for malignant lung lesions

    Cancer

    (2007)
  • M.N. Kirshbaum

    A review of the benefits of whole body exercise during and after treatment for breast cancer

    J Clin Nurs

    (2007)
  • M. Markes et al.

    Exercise for women receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer

    Cochrane Database of Syst Rev

    (2006)
  • M.L. McNeely et al.

    Effects of exercise on breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    CMAJ

    (2006)
  • V.S. Conn et al.

    A meta-analysis of exercise interventions among people treated for cancer

    Support Care Cancer

    (2006)
  • K.H. Schmitz et al.

    Controlled physical activity trials in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev

    (2005)
  • R. Knols et al.

    Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: a systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • E. Douglas

    Exercise in cancer patients

    Phys Ther Rev

    (2005)
  • D.A. Galvao et al.

    Review of exercise intervention studies in cancer patients

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • Cited by (167)

    • Physical activity for cancer prehabilitation: A scoping review

      2024, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
    • Physical Activity in Patients With Kidney Cancer: A Scoping Review

      2022, Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Whether a PA program before or shortly after surgery for KC is safe, feasible, and has any short- and/or long-term effects on renal function is unknown and an important topic for future research. The survivorship phase refers to the time between the end of primary treatment until the development of cancer recurrence or death,41 therefore, the most critical issues in this phase are supportive care outcomes (eg, physical and psychosocial adverse effects of cancer and its treatments) and disease outcomes (eg, disease-free survival and overall survival). To date, however, there are no high-quality cohort studies designed and powered to examine the association of PA with recurrence and survival in patients treated for KC.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Kerry S. Courneya, PhD: Professor and Canada Research Chair in Physical Activity and Cancer, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

    Christine M. Friedenreich, PhD: Leader, Population Health Research, Division of Population Health and Information, Alberta Cancer Board, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

    Kerry S. Courneya is supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program. Christine M. Friedenreich is supported by a Health Scholar Award from the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Both authors are supported by a Research Team Grant from the National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the Canadian Cancer Society and the Sociobehavioral Cancer Research Network.

    View full text