Original Article
Cortical and Trabecular Bone at the Forearm Show Different Adaptation Patterns in Response to Tennis Playing

https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:7:4:399Get rights and content

Abstract

Bone responds to impact-loading activity by increasing its size and/or density. The aim of this study was to compare the magnitude and modality of the bone response between cortical and trabecular bone in the forearms of tennis players. Bone area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the ulna and radius were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 57 players (24.5 ± 5.7 yr old), at three sites: the ultradistal region (50% trabecular bone), the mid-distal regions, and third-distal (mainly cortical bone). At the ultradistal radius, the side-to-side difference in BMD was larger than in bone area (8.4 ± 5.2% and 4.9 ± 4.0%, respectively, p < 0.01). In the cortical sites, the asymmetry was lower (p < 0.01) in BMD than in bone area (mid-distal radius: 4.0 ± 4.3% vs 11.7 ± 6.8%; third-distal radius: 5.0 ± 4.8% vs 8.4 ± 6.2%). The asymmetry in bone area explained 33% of the variance of the asymmetry in BMC at the ultradistal radius, 66% at the mid-distal radius, and 53% at the third-distal radius. The ulna displayed similar results. Cortical and trabecular bone seem to respond differently to mechanical loading. The first one mainly increases its size, whereas the second one preferentially increases its density.

References (41)

  • C Cassell et al.

    Bone mineral density in elite 7- to 9-yr-old female gymnasts and swimmers

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1996)
  • K Dyson et al.

    Gymnastic training and bone density in pre-adolescent females

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1997)
  • D Courteix et al.

    Effect of physical training on bone mineral density in prepubertal girls: a comparative study between impact-loading and non-impact-loading sports

    Osteoporos Int

    (1998)
  • F Lima et al.

    Effect of impact load and active load on bone metabolism and body composition of adolescent athletes

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2001)
  • CS Duncan et al.

    Bone mineral density in adolescent female athletes: relationship to exercise type and muscle strength

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2002)
  • CS Duncan et al.

    Mid-femur geometry and biomechanical properties in 15- to 18-yr-old female athletes

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2002)
  • PJ Ehrlich et al.

    Mechanical strain and bone cell function: a review

    Osteoporos Int

    (2002)
  • MK Karlsson et al.

    Bone mineral density in athletes during and after career: a comparison between loaded and unloaded skeletal regions

    Calcif Tissue Int

    (1996)
  • H Magnusson et al.

    Exercise may induce reversible low bone mass in unloaded and high bone mass in weight-loaded skeletal regions

    Osteoporos Int

    (2001)
  • D Courteix et al.

    Skull bone mass deficit in prepubertal highly-trained gymnast girls

    Int J Sports Med

    (1999)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Relationship Between Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition According to Obesity Status in Children

      2021, Endocrine Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      In line with our results, Pollock et al27 reported that %BF was negatively associated with several cortical bone parameters. Moreover, Ducher et al indicated that trabecular and cortical bone responded differently to mechanical loading; cortical bone mainly increases in size, whereas trabecular bone enhances its density.28 There are numerous covariates to consider, including height adjustment parameters for FM or pubertal status of subjects; therefore, the interpretation of opposite results regarding FM and bone remains challenging.21,29–31

    • Simplified boundary conditions alter cortical-trabecular load sharing at the distal radius; A multiscale finite element analysis

      2018, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, limiting mechanical outcomes to generalized (whole-bone) strength predictions may not fully exploit the potential of micro-FE analyses where region specific contributions can be delineated. Mechanical and adaptive response of bone is site and region specific (Ducher et al., 2004). The distal radius is comprised of cortical and trabecular bone, which exhibit unique mechanical behavior, and there exist complex interactions between the two regions (Schneider et al., 2001; Spadaro et al., 1994).

    • Bilateral Asymmetry of Radius and Tibia Bone Macroarchitecture and Microarchitecture: A High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study

      2016, Journal of Clinical Densitometry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bones are dynamic structures that respond to mechanical stimulation at both the macroarchitectural and microarchitectural level (2), and this is most apparent in athletic populations because of increased loading patterns on dominant upper limbs. In racquet sport players, for example, the dominant forearm has significantly greater bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and cross-sectional bone area (BA) when compared with the nondominant arm (3,4). Clinical studies assessing bone quality at peripheral sites, such as the distal radius, generally select either the dominant or the nondominant limb to scan.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text