Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effectiveness of External Ankle Support

Bracing and Taping in Rugby Union

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ankle inversion sprain is common in rugby. This review outlines research evidence relating to the effects of external ankle support by means of bracing and taping, on the incidence of ankle injuries, how performance is affected by support, how support may act at the joint (with respect to end range of motion, strength, resistive torque, muscle activation patterns and proprioception) to prevent injury, and how exercise changes the effectiveness of support. In addition, the implications of the laws of rugby for the use of external support are discussed. Prospective epidemiological studies have shown a decrease in the incidence of ankle injury with external ankle support use. The effectiveness of external ankle support was dependent upon the material properties and application method of the tape or brace, and on the athlete’s status of ankle stability or previous injury. Experimental studies have indicated that the degree of ankle inversion restriction provided, and the degree of loss of restriction after exercise, were dependent upon the external support tested. External ankle support has been reported to have no effect on performance, or to have an adverse effect on performance in a variety of movement tasks. No prophylactic external ankle support has been shown to improve performance. If an external support is to provide mechanical support to a ligament it should exceed the strength of the ligament, which for the anterior fibular ligament is a force limit of between 6 and 56kg. Tape can provide only limited mechanical support of the ankle joint complex, but it may have pro-prioceptive effects. Taping may work as a psychological reminder, so that the athlete consciously moderates lower limb—loading behaviour. There is equivocal evidence of the effect of brace use on ground reaction force excursions, balance ability and ankle strength. It is concluded that while there have been many investigations of the effects of tape and some forms of brace on ankle range of motion with and without exercise, there is equivocal evidence regarding the mechanism by which an external support acts. It is recommended that future research address the effects of external ankle support during dynamic exercise and that brace manufacturers utilise the information in the development of future brace designs to help reduce the risk of ankle inversion sprain injury. As external support can decrease the incidence of ankle inversion sprain the International Rugby Board should consider the use of ankle braces in rugby, allowing for stiff lateral components of the brace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ryan AJ, Cox JS, Inniss B, et al. Ankle sprains: A round table. Physician Sports Med 1986; 14 (2): 101–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan KM, Yuan Y, Li CK, et al. Sports causing most injuries in Hong Kong. Br J Sports Med 1993; 27 (4): 263–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schafle MD. Common injuries in volleyball: treatment, prevention and rehabilitation. Sports Med 1993; 16 (2): 126–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmer P, Sondergaard L, Konradsen L, et al. Epidemiology of sprains in the lateral ankle and foot. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15 (2): 72–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shawdon A, Brukner P. Injury profile of amateur Australian rules footballers. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1994; 26 (3-4): 59–61

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bladin C, McCrory P. Snowboarding injuries: an overview. Sports Med 1995; 19 (5): 358–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pienkowski D, McMorrow M, Shapiro R, et al. The effect of ankle stabilizers on athletic performance. A randomized prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1995; 23 (6): 757–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hume PA. Netball injuries in New Zealand. N Z J Sports Med 1993; 21 (2): 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu SH, Jason WJ. Lateral ankle sprains and instability problems. Clin Sports Med 1994; 13 (4): 793–809

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hume PA, Marshall SW. Sports injuries in New Zealand: Exploratory analyses. N Z J Sports Med 1994; 22 (2): 18–22

    Google Scholar 

  11. Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation. Injury Statistics 1994/1995. Wellington: Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation, 1996

  12. Subotnick SI. Foot and ankle biomechanics in walking and running. In: Subotnick SI, editor. Sports medicine of the lower extremity. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1989: 159–78

    Google Scholar 

  13. McConkey JP. Ankle sprains, consequences and mimics. In: Shephard RJ, Taunton JE, editors. Foot and ankle in Sport and Exercise. Basel: Karger, 1987: 39–55

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roy S, Irvin R. Sports Medicine: Prevention, Evaluation, Management, and Rehabilitation. New Jersey 07632: Englewood Cliffs, 1983

  15. Baratta R, Solomonow M, Zhou BH, et al. Muscular coactivation: the role of the antagonist musculature in maintaining knee stability. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (2): 113–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Balduini FC, Vegso JJ, Torg JS, et al. Management and rehabilitation of ligamentous injuries to the ankle. Sports Med 1987; 4: 364–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Garrick JG, Requa RQ. Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains. Med Sci Sports 1973; 5 (3): 200–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rovere GD, Clarke TJ, Yates CS, et al. Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (3): 228–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giel D. Ankle stabilizers: more effective than taping? Physician Sports Med 1988; 16 (1): 59–60

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reisberg S, Verstraete MC. Reusable prophylactic ankle support: A review of the literature. J Sport Rehab 1992; 1 (4): 290–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reisberg S, Verstraete MC. Reusable prophylactic ankle support. A review of the literature. J Sport Rehabil 1993; 2 (1): 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sitler MR. Role of prophylactic knee and ankle bracing in injury reduction. J Sport Rehabil 1992; 1 (3): 223–36

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sitler M, Ryan J, Wheeler B, et al. The efficacy of a semirigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball. A randomized clinical study at West Point. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (4): 454–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindenberger U, Reese D, Andreasson G, et al. The effect of prophylactic taping of ankles [PhD thesis]. Department of Textile Technology, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jerosch J, Thorwesten L, Bork H, et al. Is prophylactic bracing of the ankle cost effective? Orthopedics 1996; 19 (5): 405–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ekstrand J, Gillquist J, Liljedahl SO. Prevention of soccer injuries: supervision by doctor and physiotherapist. Am J Sports Med 1983; 11 (3): 116–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tropp H, Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Factors affecting stabilometry recordings of single limb stance. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12 (3): 185–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tropp H, Askling C, Gillquist J. Prevention of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13 (4): 259–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharpe SR, Knapik J, Jones B. Ankle braces effectively reduce recurrence of ankle sprains in female soccer players. J Athletic Training 1997; 32 (1): 21–4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Surve I, Schwellnus MP, Noakes T, et al. A fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle sprains in soccer players using the Sport-Stirrup orthosis. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (5): 601–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Passerallo AJ, Calabrese GJ. Improving traditional ankle taping techniques with rigid strapping tape. J Athletic Training 1994; 29 (1): 76–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Beriau MR, Cox WB, Manning J. Effects of ankle braces upon agility course performance in high school athletes. J Athletic Training 1994; 29 (3): 224–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Verbrugge JD. The effects of semirigid Air-Stirrup bracing vs. adhesive ankle taping on motor performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 23 (5): 320–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bocchinfuso C, Sitler MR, Kimura IF. Effects of two semirigid prophylactic ankle stabilizers on speed, agility, and vertical jump. J Sport Rehabil 1994; 3 (2): 125–34

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gross MT, Everts JR, Roberson SE, et al. Effect of Donjoy Ankle Ligament Protector and Aircast Sport-Stirrup orthoses on functional performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 19 (3): 150–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Macpherson K. Effects of a semirigid and a softshell prophylactic ankle stabilizer on performance [microfiche]. Eugene (OR). University of Oregon Microform Publications, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  37. Macpherson K, Sitler M, Kimura I, et al. Effects of a semirigid and softshell prophylactic ankle stabilizer on selected performance tests among high school football players. J Orthop 1995; 21 (3): 147–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wiley JP, Nigg BM. The effect of an ankle orthosis on ankle range of motion and performance. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1996; 23 (6): 362–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gross MT, Clemence LM, Cox BD, et al. Effect of ankle orthoses on functional performance for individuals with recurrent lateral ankle sprains. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1997; 25 (4): 245–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jerosch J, Thorwesten L, Frebel T, et al. Influence of external stabilizing devices of the ankle on sport-specific capabilities. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1997; 5 (1): 50–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Locke AB. Effect of a softshell prophylactic ankle stabilizer on performance in events involving speed, agility, and vertical jump during long-term use [thesis]. Eugene (OR): Microform Publications, International Institute for Sport & Human Performance, University of Oregon, 1996: 1 (86)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Paris DL. The effects of the Swede-O, New Cross, and McDavid ankle braces and adhesive ankle taping on speed, balance, agility, and vertical jump. J Athletic Training 1992; 27 (3): 253–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Huang CH. Lace-up ankle brace and athletic tape related to ankle kinesthesia and strength [microfiche]. Eugene (OR): University of Oregon Microform Publications, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  44. Coffman JL, Mitze NL. A comparison of ankle taping and the Aircast Sport Stirrup on athletic performance. Athletic Training 1989; 24 (2): 123

    Google Scholar 

  45. Greene TA, Wight CR. A comparative support evaluation of three ankle orthoses before, during, and after exercise. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1990; 11 (10): 453–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Burks RT, Bean BG, Marcus R, et al. Analysis of athletic performance with prophylactic ankle devices. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (2): 104–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. MacKean LC, Bell G, Burnham RS. Prophylactic ankle bracing vs taping: effects on functional performance in female basketball players. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995; 22 (2): 77–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Hochman D, Nowalkowski E. Alternate methods of ankle stabilization. J Can Athlet Ther Assoc 1982; 9 (1): 11–3

    Google Scholar 

  49. Metcalfe RC, Schlabach GA, Looney MA, et al. A comparison of moleskin tape, linen tape, and lace-up brace on joint restriction and movement performance. J Athletic Training 1997; 32 (2): 136–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Robinson JR, Frederick EC, Cooper LB. Systematic ankle stabilization and the effect on performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986; 18 (6): 625–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bennell KL, Goldie PA. The differential effects of external ankle support on postural control. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1994; 20 (6): 287–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Malina RM, Plagenz LB, Rarick LG. Effects of exercise upon measurable supporting strength of cloth and tape ankle wraps. Res Q 1962; 34: 158–65

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rarick GL. The measurable support of the ankle joint by conventional methods of taping. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1962; 44 (6): 1183–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Alves JW, Alday RV, Ketcham DL, et al. A comparison of the passive support provided by various ankle braces. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1992; 15 (1): 10–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Fumich RM, Ellison AE, Guerin GJ, et al. Measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1981; 9 (3): 165–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Frankeny JR, Jewett DL, Hanks GA, et al. A comparison of ankle-taping methods. Clin J Sport Med 1993; 3 (1): 20–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Stuessi E, Tiegermann V, Gerber H, et al. A biomechanical study of the stabilization effect of the Aircast Ankle Brace. In: Jonsson B, editor. Biomechanics XA. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics Publishers, 1987: 159–64

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hamill J. Exercise moderation of foot function during walking with a re-useable semirigid ankle orthosis. Clin Biomech 1988; 3: 153–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Martin N, Harter RA. Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise. J Athletic Training 1993; 28 (4): 324–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bartold SJ. Optoelectronic analysis of support provided by adhesive taping and ankle orthoses before, during and after exercise [abstract]. Annual Scientific Conference in Sports Medicine; 1993 Oct 26-31; Melbourne, 34

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hughes LH, Stetts DM. A comparison of ankle taping and a semirigid support. Phys Sports Med 1983; 11 (4): 99–103

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gross MT, Lapp AK, Davis JM. Comparison of Swede-OUniversal Ankle Support and Aircast Sport-Stirrup orthoses and ankle tape in restricting eversion-inversion before and after exercise. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1991; 13 (1): 11–9

    Google Scholar 

  63. Gross MT, Bradshaw MK, Ventry LC, et al. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1987; 9 (1): 33–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Greene TA, Roland GC. A comparative isokinetic evaluation of a functional ankle orthosis on talocalcaneal function. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1989; 11 (6): 245–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Gross MT, Batten AM, Lamm A, et al. Comparisons of DonJoy Ankle Ligament Protector and subtalar sling ankle taping in restricting foot and ankle motion before and after exercise. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1994; 19 (1): 33–41

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Laughman RK, Carr TA, Chao EY, et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1980; 8 (6): 425–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Myburgh KH, Vaughan CL, Isaacs SK. The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12 (6): 441–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Wilkerson GB. Comparative biomechanical effects of the standard method of ankle taping and a taping method designed to enhance subtalar stability. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19 (6): 588–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Sprigings EJ, Pelton JD, Brandell BR. An EMG analysis of the effectiveness of external ankle support during sudden ankle inversion. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1981; 6 (2): 72–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Vaes P, de Boeck H, Handelberg F, Opdecam P. Comparative radiological study of the influence of ankle joint strapping and taping on ankle stability. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1985; 7 (3): 110–4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Vaes P, de Boeck H, Handelberg F, Opdecam P. Comparative radiologic study of the influence of ankle joint bandages on ankle stability. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13 (1): 46–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Anderson DL. The role of external non-rigid ankle bracing in the prevention of inversion injuries [microfiche]. Eugene (OR): University of Oregon Microform Publications, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  73. Anderson DL, Sanderson DJ, Hennig EM. The role of external nonrigid ankle bracing in limiting ankle inversion. Clin J Sport Med 1995; 5 (1): 18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Money SM. Biomechanical comparison of support provided by the Airstirrup Ankle Training Brace pre- and post-exercise [microfiche]. Eugene (OR): University of Oregon Microform Publications, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  75. Glick JM, Gordon RB, Nishimoto D. Prevention and treatment of ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med 1976; 4 (4): 136–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Scott JZ. Effect of the active ankle brace in controlling ankle plantarflexion, inversion stress before and after exercise. Eugene (OR): University of Oregon, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  77. Bauer T. The effectiveness of ankle taping and considerations for alternatives. In: Kreighbaum E, McNeil A, editors. 6th International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Bozeman (MT): International Society of Biomechanics in Sports, 1988: 407–18

    Google Scholar 

  78. Paris DL, Vardaxis V, Kokkaliaris J. Ankle ranges of motion during extended activity periods while taped and braced. J Athletic Training 1995; 30 (3): 223–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Greene TA, Hillman SK. Elongation and forces of ankle ligaments in a physiological range of motion. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18 (5): 498–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Morris HH, Musnicki W. The effect of taping on ankle mobility following moderate exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1983; 23 (4): 422–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Tweedy R, Carson T, Vicenzino B. Leuko and Nessa Ankle braces: effectiveness before and after exercise. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1994; 26 (3-4): 62–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Miller EA, Hergenroeder AC. Prophylactic ankle bracing. Pediatr Clin North Am 1990; 37 (5): 1175–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Mclean DD. Use of adhesive strapping in sport. Br J Sports Med 1989; 23 (3): 147–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Andreasson G, Edberg B. Rheological properties of medical tape used to prevent athletic injuires. Textile Res J 1983 Apr; 53

    Google Scholar 

  85. St Pierre R, Rosen J, Whiteside T, et al. The tensile strength of the anterior talofibular ligament. Foot Ankle 1983; 4: 83–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Firer P. Effectiveness of taping for prevention of ankle ligament sprains. Br J Sports Med 1990; 24 (1): 47–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Paris DL. Comparisons of tape and commercial braces on ankle support, performance, injury prevention, and budget. In: Tenenbaum G, Raz Liebermann T, editors. 2nd Maccabiah Wingate International Congress on Sport and Coaching Sciences. Netanya (Israel): Wingate Institute, 1993: 255–8

    Google Scholar 

  88. Norris CM. Taping: components, application and mechanisms. Sports Exerc Injury 1994; 1 (1): 14–7

    Google Scholar 

  89. Bruns J, Staerk H. Mechanical ankle stabilisation due to the use of orthotic devices and peroneal muscle strength. An experimental investigation. Int J Sports Med 1992; 13 (8): 611–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Pinkowski JL, Paulos LE. Prophylactic knee and ankle orthoses. In: Renstroem PAFH, editor. Sports injuries: basic principles of prevention and care. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993: 374–87

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kimura IF, Nawoczenski DA, Epler M, et al. Effect of the Air-Stirrup in controlling ankle inversion stress. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1987; 9 (5): 190–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Scheuffelen C, Gollhofer A, Lohrer H, et al. Functional significance of braces and special shoes in subjects with and without chronic instability of the ankle joint. In: Proceedings of 9-13: Perth. Perth: Univ. of Western Australia, 1991: 173–5

    Google Scholar 

  93. Scheuffelen C, Rapp W, Gollhofer A, et al. Orthotic devices in functional treatment of ankle sprain: stabilizing effects during real movements. Int J Sports Med 1993; 14 (3): 140–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Lofvenberg R, Karrholm J. The influence of an ankle orthosis on the talar and calcaneal motions in chronic lateral instability of the ankle. A stereophotogrammetric analysis. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (2): 224–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Lindley TR, Kernozek TW. Taping and semirigid bracing may not affect ankle functional range of motion. J Athletic Training 1995; 30 (2): 109–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Gehlsen GM, Pearson D, Bahamonde R. Ankle joint strength, total work, and ROM: comparison between prophylactic devices. Athletic Training 1991; 26 (1): 62–5

    Google Scholar 

  97. Geyer M, Siebert WE. Complex movement analysis: dynamic study of the effect of a tape bandage on pronation in highjumping with three-dimensional movement analysis and electromyography. Sportverletz Sportschaden 1991; 5 (2): 103–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Carroll MJ, Rijke AM, Perrin DH. Effect of the Swede-O ankle brace on talar tilt in subjects with unstable ankles. J Sport Rehabil 1993; 2 (4): 261–7

    Google Scholar 

  99. Karlsson J, Andreasson GO. The effect of external ankle support in chronic lateral ankle joint instability. An electromyographic study. Am J Sports Med 1992; 20 (3): 257–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Lyle TD, Corbin CB. Restriction of ankle inversion: taping versus an ankle brace. Phys Educator 1992; 49 (2): 88–94

    Google Scholar 

  101. Morin GE. The effect of an air stirrup ankle brace on rearfoot control [Microfiche]. Eugene (OR): University of Oregon Microform Publications, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  102. Hamill J, Knutzen KM, Bates BT, et al. Evaluation of two ankle appliances using ground reaction force data. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1986; 7 (5): 244–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. McIntyre DR, Smith MA, Denniston NL. Effectiveness of strapping techniques during prolonged dynamic exercises. Athletic Training 1983; 18 (1): 52–5

    Google Scholar 

  104. Paris DL, Sullivan SJ. Isometric strength of rearfoot inversion and eversion in nonsupported, taped, and braced ankles assessed by a hand-held dynamometer. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 1992; 15 (5): 229–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Shapiro MS, Kabo JM, Mitchell PW, et al. Ankle sprain prophylaxis: an analysis of the stabilizing effects of braces and tape. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (1): 78–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Pope MH, Renstrom P, Donnermeyer D, et al. A comparison of ankle taping methods. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19 (2): 143–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Bunch RP, Bednarski K, Holland D, et al. Ankle joint support: a comparison of reusable lace-on braces with taping and wrapping. Physician Sports Med 1985; 13 (5): 59–62

    Google Scholar 

  108. Hartsell HD, Spaulding SJ. Effectiveness of external orthotic support on passive soft tissue resistance of the chronically unstable ankle. Foot Ankle Int 1997; 18 (3): 144–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Ferguson ABJ. The case against ankle taping. J Sports Med 1973; 1 (2): 46–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. McKanna J, Finch A. Effects of external ankle support upon IEMG activity in the lower limb while running. In: Tant CL, editor. Ninth International Symposium of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports. Ames (IA): Iowa State University, 1991: 123–6

    Google Scholar 

  111. Daanen HAM, Deegenaars WC, Fraterman H, et al. Muscular reponse to sudden ankle inversion: differences between a taped, braced and bare ankle. In: Anderson PA, Hobart DJ, Danoff JV, editors. Excerpta Medica Electromyographical Kinesiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., 1991: 107–10

    Google Scholar 

  112. Loos T, Boelens P. The effect of ankle-tape on lower limb muscleactivity. Int J Sports Med 1984; 5 (5 Suppl.): 45–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Thonnard JL, Plaghki L, Willems P, et al. Pathogenesis of ankle sprain: testing of an hypothesis. Acta Belg Med Phys 1986; 9 (2): 141–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Isakov E, Mizrahi J, Onna I, et al. The control of genu recurvatum by combining the Swedish knee-cage and an anklefoot brace. Disabil Rehabil 1992; 14 (4): 187–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Konradsen L, Ravn JB. Prolonged peroneal reaction time in ankle instability. Int J Sports Med 1991; 12 (3): 290–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Geyer M, Bergmann C, Siebert WE. Overuse syndrome in ballet: study of the effect of a tape bandage of the upper ankle joint with motion analysis. Sportverletz Sportschaden 1993; 7 (2): 78–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Wilkerson GB, Nitz AJ. Dynamic ankle stability: mechanical and neuromuscular interrelationships. J Sport Rehabil 1994; 3 (1): 43–57

    Google Scholar 

  118. Feuerbach JW, Grabiner MD, Koh TJ, et al. Effect of an ankle orthosis and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (2): 223–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Robbins S, Waked E, Rappel R. Ankle taping improves proprioception before and after exercise in young men. Br J Sports Med 1995; 29 (4): 242–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Jerosch J, Bischof M. The effect of proprioception on functional stability of the upper ankle joint with special reference to stabilizing aids. Sportverletz Sportschaden 1994; 8 (3): 111–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Jerosch J, Hoffstetter I, Bork H, et al. The influence of orthoses on the proprioception of the ankle joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1995; 3 (1): 39–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Zablonski GL. The effect of ankle bracing and taping on proprioception [dissertation abstract]. D’Youville College, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  123. Heit EJ, Lephart SM, Rozzi SL. The effect of ankle bracing and taping on joint position sense in the stable ankle. J Sport Rehab 1996; 5 (3): 206–13

    Google Scholar 

  124. Kinzey SJ, Ingersoll CD, Knight KL. The effects of selected ankle appliances on postural control. J Athletic Training 1997; 32 (4): 300–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Rivers DA. The influence of cryotherapy and Aircast bracing on total body balance and proprioception. Eugene (OR): University of Oregon, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  126. Friden T, Zatterstrom R, Lindstrand A, et al. A stabilometric technique for evaluation of lower limb instabilities. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17 (1): 118–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Tropp H, Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Stabilometry in functional instability of the ankle and its value in predicting injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984; 16 (1): 64–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Hertel JN, Guskiewicz KM, Kahler DM, et al. Effect of ankle joint anethesia on center of balance, postural sway, and joint position sense. J Sport Rehabil 1996; 5: 111–9

    Google Scholar 

  129. Hamer PW, Munt AM, Harris CD, et al. The influence of ankle strapping on wobbleboard performance, before and after exercise. Aust Physiother 1992; 38 (2): 85–92

    Google Scholar 

  130. Feuerbach JW, Grabiner MD, Koh TJ, et al. Effect of Aircast application and ankle ligament anesthesia on ankle joint proprioception. Second North American Congress on Biomechanics; 1992 Aug 24-28; Chicago 415–6

    Google Scholar 

  131. Karlsson J, Peterson L, Andreasson G, et al. The unstable ankle: a combined EMG and biomechanical modeling study. Int J Sport Biomech 1992; 8 (2): 129–44

    Google Scholar 

  132. Karlsson J, Sward L, Andreasson GO. The effect of taping on ankle stability. Practical implications. Sports Med 1993; 16 (3): 210–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. McCaw ST, Johnson KM. The effect of ankle taping on ground reaction forces during drop landings. The Second North American Congress on Biomechanics. Chicago: 1992: 107

    Google Scholar 

  134. International Rugby Football Board. Laws of the Game of Rugby Football. London: International Rugby Football Board, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Tamaki Campus, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

    Patria A. Hume

  2. School of Physical Education, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

    David F. Gerrard

Authors
  1. Patria A. Hume
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David F. Gerrard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patria A. Hume.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hume, P.A., Gerrard, D.F. Effectiveness of External Ankle Support. Sports Med. 25, 285–312 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199825050-00001

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199825050-00001

Keywords

Search

Navigation