Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Tape, Braces and Shoes on Ankle Range of Motion

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sport injuries are unwanted adverse effects accompanying participation in sports. In a wide variety of sports the most common location of injury is the ankle, frequently resulting from a forced plantar flexed inversion of the foot exceeding the physiological range of motion (ROM). Historically the purpose of external support systems is to prevent acute ankle injuries by restricting abnormal ankle ROM. It is believed that a superior restrictive effect also implies a superior preventive effect.

The purpose of this review was to examine the literature regarding the restricting effect of adhesive taping, prophylactic ankle stabilisers (PAS) and high-top shoes on ankle ROM. It has been found that tape restricts ankle eversion and inversion ROM significantly following application. However, tape loosens significantly following standardised exercise and sports activities. Studies regarding PAS reported that both semi-rigid and nonrigid stabilisers give a significant post-application restriction of ankle inversion motion. The nonrigid stabilisers show loosening over time during exercise, while the semi-rigid stabilisers maintain their restrictive effect over the same time span. High-top shoes in comparison to low-top shoes are more effective in restricting mechanically imposed ankle inversion ROM. Low-top shoes, however, also limit mechanically imposed ankle inversion stress with the ankle in the position in which ankle injury occurs most frequently. One must keep in mind, however, that a superior mechanical restriction of ankle ROM does not necessarily imply a superior preventive effect. Only well-controlled randomised studies can show such an effect, and these studies have shown a reduction of ankle injury incidence for all 3 prophylactic measures reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Table III

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health: a recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273 (5): 402–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hutchinson MR. Cheerleading injuries: patterns, prevention, case reports. Phys Sports Med 1997; 25 (9): 83–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wexler FK. The injured ankle. Am Fam Physician 1988; 57 (3): 474–80

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bylak J, Hutchinson MR. Common sports injuries in young tennis players. Sports Med 1998; 26 (2): 119–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Creagh U, Reilly T. Training and injuries amongst elite female orienteers. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1998; 38 (1): 75–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bahr R, Bahr IA. Incidence of acute volleyball injuries: a prospective cohort study of injury mechanisms and risk factors. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7 (3): 166–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maehlum S, Daljord OA. Acute sports injuries in Oslo: a oneyear study. Br J Sports Med 1984; 18 (3): 181–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wikstrom J, Andersson C. A prospective study of injuries in licensed floorball players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7 (1): 38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Callaghan MJ. Role of ankle taping and bracing in the athlete. Br J Sports Med 1997; 31 (2): 102–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garrick JG. The frequency of injury, mechanism of injury, and epidemiology of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1977; 5 (6): 241–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahr R, Lian Ø, Bahr IA. A twofold reduction in the incidence of acute ankle sprains in volleyball after the introduction of an injury prevention program: a prospective cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7 (3): 172–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrett J, Bilisko T. The role of shoes in the prevention of ankle sprains. Sports Med 1995; 20 (4): 277–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Laughman RK, Carr TA, Chao EY, et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the taped ankle before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1980; 8 (6): 425–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamamoto T, Kigawa A, Xu T. Effectiveness of functional ankle taping for judo athletes: a comparison between judo bandaging and taping. Br J Sports Med 1993; 27 (2): 110–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ekstrand J, Gillquist J. Soccer injuries and their mechanisms: a prospective study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15 (3): 267–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rovere GD, Clarke TJ, Yates CS, et al. Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16 (3): 228–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Delacerda FG. Effect of under wrap conditions on the supportive effectiveness of ankle strapping with tape. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1978; 18 (1): 77–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tropp H, Askling C, Gillquist J. Prevention of ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13 (4): 259–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gross MT, Bradshaw MK, Ventry LC, et al. Comparison of support provided by ankle taping and semirigid orthosis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987; 9 (1): 33–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lyle TD, Corbin CB. Restriction of ankle inversion: taping versus an ankle brace. Phys Educ 1992; 49 (2): 88–94

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin N, Harter RA. Comparison of inversion restraint provided by ankle prophylactic devices before and after exercise. J Athlet Train 1993; 28 (4): 324–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Baer H. The effect of high top and low cut football shoes on speed and agility. Athlet J 1970; 50: 74–7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson GR, Dowson D, Wright V. A biomechanical approach to the design of football boots. J Biomech 1976; 9 (9): 581–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stacoff A, Stuessi E, Sonderegger D. Lateral stability of sports shoes. Calgary (AB): University of Calgary, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  25. Greene TA, Hillman SK. Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18 (5): 498–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Myburgh KH, Vaughan CL, Isaacs SK. The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash match. Am J Sports Med 1984; 12 (6): 441–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Manfroy PP, Ashton-Miller JA, Wojtys EM. The effect of exercise, prewrap, and athletic tape on the maximal active and passive ankle resistance of ankle inversion. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (2): 156–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gross MT, Lapp AK, Davis JM. Comparison of Swede-O Universal Ankle Support and Aircast Sport-Stirrup orthoses and ankle tape in restricting eversion-inversion before and after exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991; 13 (1); 11–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Glick JM, Gordon RB, Nishimoto D. The prevention and treatment of ankle injuries. Am J Sports Med 1976; 4 (4): 136–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sitler MR, Horodyski M. Effectiveness of prophylactic ankle stabilisers for prevention of ankle injuries. Sports Med 1995; 20 (1): 53–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Greene TA, Wight CR. A comparative support evaluation of three ankle orthoses before, during, and after exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990; 11 (10): 453–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fumich RM, Ellison AE, Guerin GJ, et al. The measured effect of taping on combined foot and ankle motion before and after exercise. Am J Sports Med 1981; 9 (3): 165–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stover CN. Air Stirrup management of ankle injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 1980; 8: 360–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiley JP, Nigg BM. The effect of an ankle orthosis on ankle range of motion and performance. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 23 (6): 362–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Anderson DL, Sanderson DJ, Hennig EM. The role of external nonrigid ankle bracing in limiting ankle inversion. Clin J Sport Med 1995; 5 (1): 18–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tweedy R, Carson T, Vicenzino B. Leuko and Nessa ankle braces: effectiveness before and after exercise. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1994; 26 (3–4): 62–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ashton-Miller JA, Ottaviani RA, Hutchinson C, et al. What best protects the inverted weight bearing ankle against further inversion? Evertor muscle strength compares favorably with shoe height, athletic tape, and three orthoses. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (6): 800–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Greene TA, Roland GC. A comparative isokinetic evaluation of a functional ankle orthosis on talocalcaneal function. J Orthop Sports Ther 1989; 11 (6): 245–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ottaviani RA, Ashton-Miller JA, Kothari SU, et al. Basketball shoe height and the maximal muscular resistance to applied ankle inversion and eversion moments. AmJ Sports Med 1995; 23 (4): 418–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Verhagen EALM, van Mechelen W, de Vente W. The effect of preventive measures on the incidence of lateral ligament injury of the ankle. Clin J Sports Med 2000; 10 (4): 291–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Garrick JG, Requa RK. Role of external support in the prevention of ankle sprains. Med Sci Sports 1973; 5 (3): 200–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Surve I, Schwellnus MP, Noakes T, et al. A fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle sprains in soccer players using the Sport-Stirrup orthosis. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (5): 601–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Amoroso PJ, Ryan JB, Bickley B, et al. Braced for impact: reducing military paratroopers’ ankle sprains using outside the- boot braces. J Trauma 1998; 45 (3): 575–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Sitler M, Ryan J, Wheeler B, et al. The efficacy of a semirigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball: a randomized clinical study at West Point. Am J Sports Med 1994; 22 (4): 454–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Barrett JR, Tanji JL, Drake C, et al. High- versus low-top shoes for the prevention of ankle sprains in basketball players: a prospective randomized study. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (4): 582–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Robbins S, Waked E, Rappel R. Ankle taping improves proprioception before and after exercise in young men. Br J Sports Med 1995; 9 (4): 242–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this study was kindly granted by the Dutch Health Research and Development Council (Z0N).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verhagen, E.A.L.M., van der Beek, A.J. & van Mechelen, W. The Effect of Tape, Braces and Shoes on Ankle Range of Motion. Sports Med 31, 667–677 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131090-00003

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200131090-00003

Keywords

Navigation