Abstract
Quantifying human body composition has played an important role in monitoring all athlete performance and training regimens, but especially so in gravitational, weight class and aesthetic sports wherein the tissue composition of the body profoundly affects performance or adjudication. Over the past century, a myriad of techniques and equations have been proposed, but all have some inherent problems, whether in measurement methodology or in the assumptions they make. To date, there is no universally applicable criterion or ‘gold standard’ methodology for body composition assessment. Having considered issues of accuracy, repeatability and utility, the multi-component model might be employed as a performance or selection criterion, provided the selected model accounts for variability in the density of fat-free mass in its computation. However, when profiling change in interventions, single methods whose raw data are surrogates for body composition (with the notable exception of the body mass index) remain useful.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nattiv A, Loucks AB, Manore MM, et al. The female athlete triad special communications: position stand. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (10): 1867–82
Sundgot-Borgen J, Torstveit MK. Aspects of disordered eating continuum in elite high-intensity sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20: 112–21
Müller W. Towards research based approaches for solving body composition in sports: ski jumping as a heuristic example. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43 (13): 1013–9
Müller W. Determination of ski jump performance and implications for health, safety and fairness. Sports Med 2009; 39 (2): 85–106
Müller W, Gröschl W, Müller R, et al. Underweight in ski jumping: the solution of the problem. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 926–34
Adams J, Mottola M, Bagnell KM, et al. Total body fat content in a group of professional football players. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1982; 7: 36–40
Stewart AD, Hannan WJ. Prediction of fat and fat free mass in male athletes using dual X-ray absorptiometry as the reference method. J Sports Sci 2000; 18: 263–74
Hawse MR, Martin AD. Human body composition. In: Eston R, Reilly T, editors. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiological laboratory manual: tests, procedures and data, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2001: 7–43
Martin AD, Ross WD, Drinkwater DT, et al. Prediction of body fat by skinfold caliper: assumptions and cadaver evidence. Int J Obesity 1985; 9: 31–9
Martin AD, Spenst LF, Drinkwater DT, et al. Anthropometric estimation of muscle mass in men. Med Sci Sports Exer 1990; 22: 729–33
Martin AD, Drinkwater DT, Clarys JP, et al. Effects of skin thickness and skinfold compressibility on skinfold thickness measurement. Am J Hum Biol 1992; 4 (4): 453–60
Wang Z, Shen W, Withers RT, et al. Multicomponent molecular-level models of body composition analysis. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, et al., editors. Human body composition: 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005: 163–76
Withers RT, Laforgia J, Heymsfield SB. Critical appraisal of the estimation of body composition via two, three, and four-compartment models. Am J Hum Biol 1999; 11 (2): 175–85
Friedl KE, DeLuca JP, Marchitelli LJ, et al. Reliability of body-fat estimations from a four-component model by using density, body water, and bone mineral measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55: 764–70
Lohman TG, Harris M, Teixeira PJ, et al. Assessing body composition and changes in body composition. Another look at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 904: 45–54
Clasey JL, Kanaley JA, Wideman L, et al. Validity of methods of body composition assessment in young and older men and women. J Appl Physiol 1999; 86 (5): 1728–38
Wang Z, Heymsfield SB, Chen S, et al. Estimation of percentage body fat by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: evaluation by in vivo human elemental composition. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 2619–35
Runge VM, Nitz WR, Schmeets SH. The physics of clinical MR: taught through images. New York (NY): Thieme, 2005
Liang Z-P, Lauterbur PC. Principles of magnetic resonance imaging: a signal processing perspective. New York (NY): IEEE Press, 2000
Clarys JP, Scafoglieri A, Provyn S, et al. A macro-quality evaluation of DXA variables using whole dissection, ashing and computer tomography in pigs. Obesity 2010; 18 (8): 1477–85
Pietrobelli A, Formica C, Wang Z, et al. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. Am J Physiol 1996; 271: E941–51
Prior BM, Cureton KJ, Modelsky CM, et al. In vivo validation of whole body composition estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol 1997; 83: 623–30
Wang ZM, Visser M, Ma R, et al. Skeletal muscle mass: evaluation of neutron activation and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry methods. J App Physiol 1996; 80 (3): 824–31
Wang W, Wang Z, Faith MS, et al. Regional skeletal muscle measurement: evaluation of new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry model. J App Physiol 1999; 87 (3): 1163–71
Kim J, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB, et al. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: estimation by a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76 (2): 378–83
Tothill P, Hannan WJ, Wilkinson S. Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue. Brit J Radiol 2001; 74: 166–76
Visser V, Fuerst T, Lang T, et al. Validity of fan beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for measuring fat-free mass and leg muscle mass. J App Physiol 1999; 87 (4): 1513–20
Brozek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, et al. Densitometric analysis of body composition: revision of some quantitative assumptions. Ann NY Acad Sci 1963; 110: 113–40
Siri WE. The gross composition of the body. In: Lawrence JH, Tobias CA, editors. Advances in biological and medical physics. London: Academic Press, 1956
Going SB. Hydrodensitometry and air displacement plethysmography. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, et al., editors. Human body composition, 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005: 17–33
Wilmore JH, Vodak PA, Parr RB, et al. Further simplification of a method for determination of residual volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1980; 12: 216–8
Peeters M, Claessens A. Effect of deviating clothing schemes on the accuracy of body composition measurements by air-displacement plethysmography. Inte J Body Comp Res 2009; 7 (4): 123–9
Peeters M, Claessens A. Effect of different swim caps on the assessment of body volume and percentage body fat by air displacement plethysmography. J Sports Sci 2011; 29: 191–6
Biaggi RB, Vollman MW, Niles MA, et al. Comparison of air-displacement plethysmography with hydrostatic weighing and bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of body composition in healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69: 898–903
Vescovi J, Hildebrandt L, Miller W, et al. Evaluation of the BOD POD for estimating percent fat in female college athletes. J Str Cond Res 2002; 16: 599–605
Claros G, Hull HR, Fields DA. Comparison of air displacement plethysmography to hydrostatic weighing for estimating total body density in children. BMC Pediatrics 2005; 5: 37
Collins MA, Millard-Stafford ML, Sparling PB, et al. Evaluation of the BOD POD for assessing body fat in collegiate football players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31 (9): 1350–6
Bender DA, Bender AE. Nutrition: A reference handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997: 10–138
Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for water, sodium, chloride, potassium and sulphate. Washington, DC: National Academic Press, 2005: 73–185
Schoeller DA. Hydrometry. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, et al., editors. Human body composition. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005: 35–49
Bullen BA, Quaade F, Olsen F, et al. Ultrasonic reflections used for measuring subcutaneous fat in humans. Hum Biol 1965; 37 (4): 375–84
Booth RAD, Goddard BA, Paton A. Measurement of fat thickness in man: a comparison of ultrasound, Harpenden calipers and electrical conductivity. Brit J Nutr 1966; 20 (4): 719–25
Bellisari A, Roche AF. Anthropometry and ultrasound. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, Going SB, editors. Human body composition. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005: 109–27
Bellisari A, Roche AF, Siervogel RM. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thickness. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1993; 17 (8): 475–80
Ishida Y, Carroll JF, Pollock ML, et al. Reliability of B-mode ultrasound for the measurement of body fat and muscle thickness. Am J Hum Biol 1992; 4: 511–20
Abe T, Kawakami Y, Sugita M, et al. Use of B-mode ultrasound for visceral fat mass evaluation: comparisons with magnetic resonance imaging. Appl Human Sci 1995; 14 (3): 133–9
Moore TL, Lunt M, McManus B, et al. Seventeen-point dermal ultrasound scoring system: a reliable measure of skin thickness in patients with systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2003; 42 (12): 1559–63
Horn M, Müller W. Towards an accurate determination of subcutaneous adipose tissue by means of ultrasound [abstract WCB-A01448-02611]. 6th World Congress of Bio-mechanics; 2010 Aug 1–6; Singapore
Ross R, Janssen I. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, et al., editors. Human body composition, 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005: 89–108
Koda M, Senda M, Kamba M, et al. Subcutaneous and visceral fat indices represent the distribution of body fat volume. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32 (3): 387–92
Wells JCK, Treleaven P, Cole TJ. BMI compared with 3-dimensional body shape: The UK national sizing survey. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85: 419–25
Wells JCK, Cole TJ, Treleaven P. Age-variability in body shape associated with excess weight: The UK national sizing survey. Obesity 2008; 16: 435–41
Wells JCK, Cole TJ, Bruner D, et al. Body shape in American and British adults: between-country and interethnic comparisons. Int J Obesity 2008; 32: 152–9
Wang J, Gallagher D, Thornton JC, et al. Validation of a 3-dimensional photonic scanner for the measurement of body volumes, dimensions, and percentage body fat. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83: 809–16
Garlie TN, Obusek JP, Corner BD, et al. Comparison of body fat estimates using 3D digital laser scans, direct manual anthropometry and DXA in men. Am J Hum Biol 2010; 22: 695–701
Schranz N, Tomkinson G, Olds T, et al. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis: Differences between elite Australian rowers and the general population. J Sports Sci 2010; 28: 459–69
Mateigka J. The testing of physical efficiency. Am J Phys Anthropol 1921; 4: 223–30
Tanner JM. The physique of the Olympic athlete. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1964
Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988
Hume P, Marfell-Jones M. The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 1333–40
Marfell-Jones M, Olds T, Stewart AD, et al. International standards for anthropometric assessment. Potchesfstroom: International Society for the Advancement of Kinan-thropometry, 2006
Durnin JVGA, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr 1974; 32: 77–97
Sinning WE, Dolny DG, Little KD, et al. Validity of “generalised” equations for body composition analysis in male athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17: 124–30
Thorland WG, Tipton CM, Lohman TG, et al. Midwest wrestling study: prediction of minimal weight for high school wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23 (9): 1102–10
Lohman TG. Skinfolds and body density and their relationship to body fatness: a review. Hum Biol 1981; 53 (2): 181–255
Behnke AR, Wilmore JH. Evaluation and regulation of body build and composition. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall, 1974
Van Der Kooy K, Leenen R, Siedell JC, et al. Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. Brit J Nutr 1993; 70: 47–58
Valsamakis G, Chetty R, Anwar A, et al. Association of simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat and the metabolic syndrome. Diabetic Med 2004; 21: 1339–448
Iribarren C, Darbinian JA, Lo JC, et al. Value of the sagittal abdominal diameter in coronary heart disease risk assessment: cohort study in a large, multiethnic population. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 164: 1150–9
Stewart AD, Nevill AM, Johnstone AM. Shape change assessed by 3D laser scanning following weight loss in obese men. In: Hume P, Stewart AD, de Ridder H, editors. Kinanthropometry XI: 2008 Pre-Olympic Congress Anthropometry Research. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, 2009: 20–4
Marfell-Jones MJ. The value of the skinfold: background assumptions, cautions, and recommendations on taking and interpreting skinfold measurements. In: KAHPERD, Proceedings of the 2001 Seoul International Sport Science Congress, Seoul, 2001: 313–23
Carter JEL. Morphological factors limiting human performance. In: Eckert HM, Clarke DH, editors. The limits of human performance. The American Academy of Physical Education Papers, No. 18. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1985: 106–17
Carter JEL, Ackland TR. Kinanthropometry in Aquatic Sports. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1994
Ridge BR, Broad E, Kerr DA, et al. Morphological characteristics of Olympic slalom canoe and kayak paddlers. Europ J Sp Sci 2007; 7 (2): 107–13
Kerr DA, Ackland TR, Ross WD, et al. Olympic lightweight and open rowers possess distinctive physical and proportionality characteristics. J Sports Sci 2007; 25 (1): 43–53
Carter JEL, Ackland TR, Kerr DA, et al. Somatotype and size of elite female basketball players. J Sports Sci 2005; 23 (10): 1057–63
Kerr DA, Stewart AD. Body composition in sport. In: Ackland T, Elliott B, Bloomfield J, editors. Applied anatomy and biomechanics in sport. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2009: 67–86
Orphanidou CI, McCargar LJ, Birmingham CL, et al. Changes in body composition and fat distribution after short term weight gain in patients with anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65: 1034–41
Stewart AD. Body composition in athletes assessed by DXA and other methods [unpublished PhD thesis]. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 1999
Stewart AD. Anthropometric fat patterning in male and female subjects. In: Reilly T, Marfell-Jones M, editors. Kinanthropometry VIII: Proceedings of the 8th International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry Conference. London: Routledge, 2003: 195–238
Chumlea WC, Sun SS. Bioelectrical impedance analysis. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, et al., editors. Human body composition, 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2005: 79–87
Matthie JR. Bioimpedance measurements of human body composition: critical analysis and outlook. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008; 5 (2): 239–61
Wabel P, Chamney P, Moissl U, et al. Importance of whole-body bioimpedance spectroscopy for the management of fluid balance. Blood Purif 2009; 27 (1): 75–80
Lohman TG. Advances in human body composition. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1992
Lee J, Kolonel LN, Hinds MW. Relative merits of the weight-corrected-for-height indices. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34: 2521–9
Keyes A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, et al. Indices of relative weight and obesity. J Chron Dis 1972; 25: 329–43
Benn RT. Some mathematical properties of weight-for-height indices used as measures of adiposity. Br J Prev Soc Med 1971; 25: 42–50
WHO Expert Committee. Physical status, use and interpretation of anthropometry. Technical Report Series 1995; 854: 355
Norgen NG. Population differences in body composition in relation to the BMI. Eur Clin Nutr 1994; 48: 10–27
Nevill AM, Winter EM, Ingham SA, et al. Adjusting athletes’ body mass index to better reflect adiposity in epidemiological research. J Sports Sci 2010; 28: 1009–24
WHO Expert Committee. Physical status, use and interpretation of anthropometry. Technical Report Series 1995; 854: 428
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the support from the Medical Commission of the International Olympic Committee in creating the Ad Hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition, Health and Performance. This review of the status of body composition assessment methods was one of the primary objectives of the working group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ackland, T.R., Lohman, T.G., Sundgot-Borgen, J. et al. Current Status of Body Composition Assessment in Sport. Sports Med 42, 227–249 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11597140-000000000-00000