False positive rate of thoracic outlet syndrome diagnostic maneuvers

Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Mar;48(2):67-74.

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aim to determine the false-positive rate & specificity in normal subjects and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients of five provocative maneuvers used to diagnose thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS).

Design/methods: We prospectively evaluated subjects with clinical and electrophysiological evidence of CTS as well as normal subjects. All subjects underwent provocative testing by a blinded physician, which included the Adson A & B tests, Costoclavicular maneuver (CCM), Elevated arm stress test (Roos), and Supraclavicular pressure (SCP).

Results: In the CTS group, false positive tests were observed in 42% in the Adson A test, 45% in the Adson B test, 48% in the CCM, 77% in the Roos test, and 61% in the SCP 94% of the CTS patients had at least 1 positive TOS diagnostic maneuver. In the normal group, false positive tests were observed in 9% in the Adson A test, 20% in the Adson B test, 16% in the CCM, 47% in the Roos test, and 30% in the SCP 56% of the normal patients had at least 1 positive TOS diagnostic maneuver.

Conclusions: We conclude that current provocative maneuvers used to diagnose TOS result in a high false-positive rate in normal subjects and an even higher false-positive rate in CTS patients.

Publication types

  • Controlled Clinical Trial
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Arm
  • Claviceps
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological / standards*
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain / diagnosis
  • Paresthesia / diagnosis
  • Posture*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ribs
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Thoracic Outlet Syndrome / diagnosis*