Responses

Download PDFPDF

Chiropractic spinal manipulation for back pain
Free
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Authors' Reply: chiropractic spinal manipulation for back pain
    • E Ernst, Director
    • Other Contributors:
      • Sran MM

    Dear Editor

    McCarthy, Byfield [1] and Breen [2] make a number of comments which require a brief reply. I wrote the article on this specific subject because I was invited to do so by the British Journal of Sports Medicine. All three correspondents seem to oppose my "long track record" of writing about adverse effects of spinal manipulation. I do this simply because it is my job. I try to apply the rules of science to al...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Observations concerning chiropractic spinal manipulation for back pain a reply

    Dear Editor

    We found the leader by Professor Ernst (Br J Sports Med 2003;37:195-196) to be rather disjointed, out of date and potentially misleading. This is particularly evident in the initial paragraph. The author begins by generally addressing sports medicine clinicians, including those who are trained in mobilisation and manipulation, namely osteopaths, physiotherapists and chiropractors and a...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    The "war" on chiropractors
    • Alan C Breen, Professor of Musculoskeletal Health Care
    • Other Contributors:
      • Anglo-European College of Chiropractic

    Dear Editor

    The Ernst and Sran commentary [1] about 'chiropractic manipulation' is not consistent with the majority of systematic reviews, nor national guidelines. It is, however, highly consistent with the previous and prolific writings of the first author himself on this topic. Surely, the significance of this pattern is an obvious one, and the suggestion that if anyone else but a chiropractor performs a ma...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.